· Private foundation
Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k29 grants · $126k
- $10k–50k49 grants · $774k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $453k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GENEROSITY TRUST THE | $100,000 |
| UC FOUNDATION INC | $83,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA | $69,592 |
| THE NONPROFIT RESOURCE CENTER | $50,000 |
| CHATTANOOGA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| ERLANGER HEALTH | $50,000 |
| PARTNERSHIP FOR FAMILIES CHILDREN AND ADULTS INC | $50,000 |
| BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE | $35,000 |
| LIFESPRING COMMUNITY HEALTH | $30,000 |
| PUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE | $30,000 |
| BRYAN COLLEGE | $30,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CHATTANOOGA INC | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| CHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN | $25,000 |
| CHI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $719k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
96 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $139k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BBBethel Bible Village6× · 2020–2025 · $207k · revenue +31%
- PSPUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +68%
- VIVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CHATTANOOGA INC6× · 2020–2025 · $169k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- BOBASILICA OF STS PETER AND PAULone grant, 2021 · $25k
- BCBUILDING & CONSTRUCTION WORKFORCE CENTERone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -96%
- YYMCAone grant, 2023 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advocate for people who are homless or near homeless, strategically planning for housing and services in the community, maximizing resources and collaboarating with community partners to implement housing and services within the…
Mission: to create economically diverse neighborhoods filled with financially empowered citizens and housing for all.vision: all chattanoogans can afford a safe place in a strong neighborhood to call home. belief: we believe the future of…
Chattanooga design studio seeks to elevate the quality of life for all citizens through guidance, collaboration, innovation, and education that promotes livable, accessible, walkable, and humane urban design.
Our mission is to connect chattanooga's technology sector to drive regional economic growth.
To equip men to initiate and lead for christ in their homes, churches, communities and the marketplace.
Invest chattanooga uses flexible, low-cost capital and strategic public-private partnerships to produce financially sustainable, mixed-income housing with deep permanent affordability that the market alone cannot deliver.
To partner with families in providing students a christ-centered and academically challenging education equipping them with a biblical worldview as they grow in understandings, attitudes, skills, and in favor with god and man.
Encourage economic development
Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
To advance state policies and practices that ensure all tennessee children from birth through 3rd grade get the high quality early education they need to power our state's future.
Education regarding matters of public concern to improve the quality and increase the quantity of economic growth and employment opportunities.
Providing services to clients to assist in preventing homelessness, training partner organizations on reporting system and reporting to governments, statistical information.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gaining Ground. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 158 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc ↗
- Who funds BRYAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Bethel Bible Village ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CHATTANOOGA INC ↗
- Who funds Nonprofit Resource Center ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR FAMILIES CHILDREN AND ADULTS INC ↗
- Who funds LIFESPRING COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHATTANOOGA INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH ISSUES ↗
- Who funds THE SHEPHERD'S ARMS RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds WELCOME HOME OF CHATTANOOGA ↗
- Who funds SKYUKA HALL ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR THE INNER CITY INC ↗
- Who funds CHATTANOOGA ROOM IN THE INN INC ↗
- Who funds SIGNAL CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER ↗
- Who funds CHATT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INC OF CHATTANOOGA ↗
- Who funds CHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE HAPPY SHOES PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA AREA INC ↗
- Who funds CHATTANOOGA AUTISM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA ↗
- Who funds CHATTANOOGA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds ON POINT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc · Robert L & Kathrina H Maclellan Founda Foundation · Robert F Stone Foundation AKA Bobby Stone Foundation · Benwood Foundation Inc · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Hamico Inc · United Way of Greater Chattanooga · McKenzie Foundation D/B/A the McKenzie Foundation · Tucker Foundation · Lillian L Colby Charitable Fdn Ia · Schillhahn-Huskey Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.