· Private foundation
George R Johnson Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $82k
- $10k–50k51 grants · $886k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $935k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OCOEE REGION | $180,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATIO | $100,000 |
| LEE UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| YMCA | $100,000 |
| MUSEUM CENTER AT 5IVE POINTS | $100,000 |
| HOLSTON HOME FOR CHILDREN | $75,000 |
| TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $75,000 |
| TRI-COUNTY CENTER | $55,000 |
| PARTNERSHIP FOR FAMILIESCHILDREN | $50,000 |
| CHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN | $50,000 |
| LIFE BRIDGES | $50,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHATT | $40,000 |
| THE CARING PLACE | $40,000 |
| YMCA | $35,000 |
| ON POINT | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
118 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2025, 56 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $169k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY8× · 2017–2025 · $550k · revenue +49%
- LULEE UNIVERSITY3× · 2021–2025 · $400k · revenue +3%
- TCTHE CARING PLACE8× · 2017–2025 · $350k · revenue +326%
Funded once
- SHSISKIN HOSPITAL FOR REHABILITATIONone grant, 2022 · $100k
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS - GORDMURRWHITone grant, 2021 · $83k
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NW GEORGIAone grant, 2019 · $80k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advocate for people who are homless or near homeless, strategically planning for housing and services in the community, maximizing resources and collaboarating with community partners to implement housing and services within the…
Family promise of greater chattanooga's mission is to provide help for homeless families with children be housed and self-sufficient.
Provide advocacy for abused and neglected children in juvenile court.
To combat severe physical and sexual abuse and resulting trauma by coordinating and providing services in a child friendly, safe and nurturing environment.
To be the voice for children who have been victims of abuse and/or neglect. Our vision is to serve every child in the Cheaha Region by providing them with a caring and competent trained volunteer.
Chattanooga design studio seeks to elevate the quality of life for all citizens through guidance, collaboration, innovation, and education that promotes livable, accessible, walkable, and humane urban design.
Legal aid of east tennessee provides legal representation, legal education, and other civil legal services for the low-income population in our community through advocacy of all types.
The united way of south central tennessee's mission is to improve lives by advancing opportunities for education, health, and financial stability for all. its vision is to be the primary community solutions leader for human services.
Volunteer East Tennessee inspires service by equipping organizations and mobilizing volunteers to connect with one another and strengthen communities.
Providing services to clients to assist in preventing homelessness, training partner organizations on reporting system and reporting to governments, statistical information.
The United Way of Cleveland County helps people by uniting resources and programs to responsibly meet the needs of our community.
Tennessee children's home, inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides a home for neglected and pre-delinquent children who have an unstable family situation and who are beginning to develop problems which cannot be solved in their…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Artsbuild and the most unlike its peers is House of Refuge Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 207 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LEE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE CARING PLACE ↗
- Who funds TRI-STATE EXHIBITION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Bethel Bible Village ↗
- Who funds ON POINT ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Creative Discovery Museum ↗
- Who funds LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds HOLSTON HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CASA CORRIDOR OF EAST TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds MOSE & GARRISON SISKIN MEMORIAL FDN INC D/B/A SISKIN CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BRADLEY CLEVELAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY FIELDS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE OCOEE REGION ↗
- Who funds LIFT YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST GEORGIAINC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CLEVELAND INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LOUDON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc · Robert F Stone Foundation AKA Bobby Stone Foundation · Tucker Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc · Lyndhurst Foundation Inc · Benwood Foundation Inc · Hamico Inc · Robert L & Kathrina H Maclellan Founda Foundation · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Chattanooga · Community Foundation of Cleveland and Bradley County
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George R Johnson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to George R Johnson Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to George R Johnson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.