Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shapiro Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Housing & Shelter$81kPhilanthropy$34kHuman Services$31kHealth$25kYouth Development$22kEducation$22kInternational$19kAnimals$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLUE RIDER STABLES$5,000
ISAIAH HOUSE$5,000
SHARE AFRICA$5,000
SKYS THE LIMIT FUND$4,000
LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SOMERSET COU$3,500
PATH TO THE HEART FOUNDATION$3,000
SENIOR CENTER OF THE CHATHAMS$2,500
CAMPHILL FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BLUE RIDER STABLES: $5k → 12%SKYS THE LIMIT FUND: $4k → 8%SKYS THE LIMIT FUND: $4k → 8%SKYS THE LIMIT FUND: $3k → 8%CAMPHILL FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%CAMPHILL FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%CAMPHILL FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%CAMPHILL FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$188k · 12 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$188k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+44%

Still filing today

42%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsInternationalPublic BenefitRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    ISAIAH HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +128%
  • LV
    LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF MORRIS COUNTY INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $11k · revenue +105%
  • CF
    CAMPHILL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • RF
    RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -24%
  • RD
    ROAD DOGS & RESCUEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +44%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rosies Farm Sanctuary Inc

To inspire compassion in the hearts of all people and be the voice for animals by rescuing and rehabilitating farm animals and providing educational programs and advocacy.

Animals
2
Retrieve a Golden of Minnesota (Ragom) Inc

Retrieve a golden of the midwest (ragom) rescues, fosters, and rehomes golden retrievers and golden mixes that can no longer remain in their current environments. the organization ensures each dog receives necessary veterinary care and…

Animals
3
Ramapo Rescue Dog Foundation

To support the mission of the ramapo rescue dog association.

Animals
4
Camp Ramah in the Poconos

Camp ramah's mission is to create a nurturing, safe, fun-filled, vibrant jewish community that inspires the education, social, cultural, moral, physical, and emotional growth of campers and staff, fostering life-long jewish identity. ramah…

Recreation & Sports
5
New York Road Runners Inc

As a new york city based nonprofit, we're dedicated to transforming the health and well-being of our communities through inclusive and accessible running experiences, empowering all to achieve their potential.

6
Raspberry Pi Foundation North America Inc

Raspberry pi foundation north america enables young people to realize their full potential through the power of computer science and ai.

Science & Tech
7
Farm Sanctuary Inc

We pursue bold solutions to end animal agriculture and foster just and compassionate vegan living through education and policy advocacy.

Animals
8
Rosemary Farm Sanctuary Inc

At rosemary farm, our mission is to rescue horses in need and protect them for life. we save equines from slaughter, neglect and abuse. while adoption is not our focus, select horses may be available to the right home, if right for the…

Animals
9
The Raptor Trust

The raptor trust is dedicated to the rescue, rehabilitation, and release of injured and orphaned raptors in new jersey and beyond. we strive to educate the public about the vital role these magnificent birds play in our ecosystem,…

Animals
10
Winding Branch Ranch

Winding branch ranch's mission is to rescue, revive, and rehome farm animals in need while educating communities about humane, ethical, and sustainable farming practices.

Animals
11
Wayside Waifs Inc

Wayside prepares pets and people for the bond of their lives by protecting and caring for the pets under our watch; by collaborating with and supporting the community; and by advocating for and sharing the profound joy that pets bring to…

Animals
12
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Rockefeller philanthropy advisors aims to accelerate philanthropy in pursuit of a just world

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ramapo for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pepup Tech Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ISAIAH HOUSE INC — $80,500 · OtherISAIAH HOUSE INCSHARE AFRICA — $14,000 · OtherSHARE AFRICAPATH TO THE HEART FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 · OtherPATH TO THE HEART FOUNDATION INCFAMILY ASSISTANCE RESOURCE CENTER — $10,500 · OtherFAMILY ASSISTANCE RESOURCE CENTERSENIOR CENTER OF THE CHATHAMS — $9,000 · OtherPATH OF THE HEART — $6,000 · Other+12 more — $38,050 · Other+12 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF VOLUSIA & FLAGLER COUNTIES INC — $34,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERAT…CAMPHILL FOUNDATION — $10,080 · Human ServicesCAMPHILL F…SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND — $10,000 · Human ServicesSKY'S THE …BLUE RIDER STABLES INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBLUE RIDER…RICHIES SPIRIT FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 · Public BenefitWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $7,500 · AnimalsROAD DOGS & RESCUE — $5,000 · AnimalsLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF MORRIS COUNTY INC — $10,500 · EducationRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC — $5,995 · Recreation & Sports
Other$170,050Philanthropy$34,000Human Services$25,080Public Benefit$12,500Animals$12,500Education$10,500Recreation & Sports$5,995

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetISAIAH HOUSE INC — $80,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF VOLUSIA & FLAGLER COUNTIES INC — $34,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetRICHIES SPIRIT FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 2y, 16% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF MORRIS COUNTY INC — $10,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCAMPHILL FOUNDATION — $10,080 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSKY'S THE LIMIT FUND — $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC — $5,995 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE RIDER STABLES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetROAD DOGS & RESCUE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEPUP TECH INC — $3,300 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ISAIAH HOUSE INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF VOLUSIA & FLAGLER COUNTIES INC
  • Who funds RICHIES SPIRIT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF MORRIS COUNTY INC
  • Who funds CAMPHILL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds BLUE RIDER STABLES INC
  • Who funds ROAD DOGS & RESCUE
  • Who funds THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC
  • Who funds PEPUP TECH INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shapiro Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • Isaiah House Inc21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Shapiro Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Shapiro Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph