· Private foundation
Shannon Family Charitable Fdn Fifth Third
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k34 grants · $88k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $253k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THERE WITH CARE | $30,000 |
| PAWS WITH A CAUSE | $21,750 |
| FRIENDS OF THE ELK RAPIDS DISTRICT | $20,000 |
| MIRAKIND | $20,000 |
| GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY | $17,000 |
| AVOW HOSPICE | $15,000 |
| MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM | $15,000 |
| ST MATHEWS HOUSE INC | $15,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF COLLIER COUNTY | $13,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL | $13,000 |
| CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA | $13,000 |
| ANGEL'S PLACE | $10,000 |
| THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR | $10,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $10,000 |
| PROJECT HEALING WATERS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $668k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHERE WITH CARE7× · 2019–2025 · $254k · revenue +18%
- GTGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY6× · 2020–2025 · $161k · revenue +230%
- PWPaws With A Cause7× · 2019–2025 · $112k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- MCMIRAKIND c/o Miradxone grant, 2019 · $18k
- WSWYOMING SCHOOL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +76%
- CACANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.
The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…
To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.
Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…
The mission of the michigan animal rescue league is to provide the highest quality of life to dogs and cats through rescue, medical care, socialization and behavioral support, short- and long-term sanctuary, adoption, and community…
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…
Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Food Basket Inc and the most unlike its peers is Broken Shovels Farm and Sanctuary School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
- Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds MIRAKIND ↗
- Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
- Who funds THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT ↗
- Who funds AVOW Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
- Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds ANGELS' PLACE ↗
- Who funds Avow Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Northwood University ↗
- Who funds Michigan Tech Fund ↗
- Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ELK RAPIDS DISTRICT LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS ↗
- Who funds ATTENTION INC ↗
- Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS ↗
- Who funds THE BARN FOR EQUINE LEARNING ↗
- Who funds CASS TECH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOC ↗
- Who funds Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries ↗
- Who funds BOSOM BUDDIES BREAST CANCER SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL KIDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Frey Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Siebenthaler Foundation · Feeding America West Michigan · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · American Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Shannon Family Charitable Fdn Fifth Third funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
- Avow Hospice Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.