Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shannon Family Charitable Fdn Fifth Third

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$341k
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$623kHealth$519kEnvironment$263kHousing & Shelter$212kAnimals$136kEducation$125kYouth Development$96kFood & Nutrition$81kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $88k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $253k
$3,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THERE WITH CARE$30,000
PAWS WITH A CAUSE$21,750
FRIENDS OF THE ELK RAPIDS DISTRICT$20,000
MIRAKIND$20,000
GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY$17,000
AVOW HOSPICE$15,000
MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM$15,000
ST MATHEWS HOUSE INC$15,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF COLLIER COUNTY$13,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$13,000
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA$13,000
ANGEL'S PLACE$10,000
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR$10,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$10,000
PROJECT HEALING WATERS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $668k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%WOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC: $10k → 11%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $30k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $27k → 10%TGTHR: $4k → 12%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $30k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $22k → 10%ATTENTION INC: $4k → 12%WOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC: $5k → 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $22k → 10%ATTENTION INC: $4k → 12%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $16k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $12k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $11k → 10%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $5k → 10%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $10k → 8%THERE WITH CARE: $45k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $44k → 12%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $10k → 8%THERE WITH CARE: $40k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $32k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $32k → 12%ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $4k → 11%THERE WITH CARE: $30k → 12%ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $4k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $4k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $4k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $3k → 11%AVOW HOSPICE: $30k → 10%SPECIAL KIDS INC: $5k → 21%AVOW HOSPICE: $30k → 10%REVIVE AND THRIVE PROJECT: $2k → 11%SPECIAL KIDS INC: $5k → 21%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%AVOW HOSPICE: $25k → 10%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%AVOW HOSPICE: $15k → 10%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $10k → 8%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $10k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $18k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $10k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $10k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $5k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $5k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
CO
MD
TN
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 56 repeat orgs$197k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

56 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
31

Total granted

$2.0M
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+22%

Still filing today

66%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THERE WITH CARE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $254k · revenue +18%
  • GT
    GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $161k · revenue +230%
  • PW
    Paws With A Cause
    7× · 2019–2025 · $112k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • MC
    MIRAKIND c/o Miradx
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
  • WS
    WYOMING SCHOOL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +76%
  • CA
    CANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
2
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
3
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
Michigan Animal Rescue League

The mission of the michigan animal rescue league is to provide the highest quality of life to dogs and cats through rescue, medical care, socialization and behavioral support, short- and long-term sanctuary, adoption, and community…

Animals
6
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
7
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
8
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
9
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals
10
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
11
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
12
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Food Basket Inc and the most unlike its peers is Broken Shovels Farm and Sanctuary School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Animal Rescue and ShelterDevelopmental Disabilities …School District FoundationsEquine Therapy ProgramsYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity College Foundatio…Policy Research and AdvocacyChristian Missionary Organi…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Military Veterans SupportCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/71
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,494

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/64
Grantees still filing
44/64
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THERE WITH CARE — $254,000 · Human ServicesTHERE WITH CAREPaws With A Cause — $111,750 · Human ServicesPaws With A CauseTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT — $110,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROITAVOW Hospice Inc — $100,000 · Human ServicesAVOW Hospice IncANGELS' PLACE — $53,000 · Human ServicesANGELS' PLACEWOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC — $28,600 · Human Services+8 more — $82,100 · Human Services+8 moreTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $73,000 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORI…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL — $68,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONALREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $52,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHI…COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $30,500 · OtherTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM — $75,000 · OtherTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAMKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC — $77,000 · OtherKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC+55 more — $301,856 · Other+55 moreMIRAKIND — $136,000 · HealthMIRAKINDAvow Foundation Inc — $40,000 · HealthAvow Foundation…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $21,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…SPECIAL KIDS INC — $20,500 · HealthSPECIAL KIDS IN…CEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC — $17,000 · HealthCEREBRAL PALSY …THE BARN FOR EQUINE LEARNING — $16,000 · HealthDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries — $13,500 · Health+5 more — $38,000 · Health+5 moreGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $160,500 · Environment+1 more — $1,500 · EnvironmentST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS — $16,500 · Housing & ShelterNorthwood University — $35,000 · EducationMichigan Tech Fund — $33,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE ELK RAPIDS DISTRICT LIBRARY — $20,000 · EducationCASS TECH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOC — $15,000 · EducationMiami University Foundation — $8,000 · EducationSCHOOLS OFFER SUPPORT INC — $4,000 · EducationPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC — $80,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC — $19,500 · AnimalsSAVED BY ZADE — $6,000 · Animals+2 more — $5,000 · Animals
Human Services$739,450Other$677,356Health$302,000Environment$162,000Housing & Shelter$116,500Education$115,000Animals$110,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHERE WITH CARE — $254,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $160,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMIRAKIND — $136,000 over 6y, 67% of budgetPaws With A Cause — $111,750 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT — $110,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetAVOW Hospice Inc — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $100,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC — $80,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC — $77,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM — $75,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $73,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetANGELS' PLACE — $53,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAvow Foundation Inc — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNorthwood University — $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMichigan Tech Fund — $33,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $30,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC — $28,600 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION — $22,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL KIDS INC — $20,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ELK RAPIDS DISTRICT LIBRARY — $20,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC — $19,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS — $17,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetATTENTION INC — $17,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC — $17,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS — $16,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARN FOR EQUINE LEARNING — $16,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetCASS TECH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOC — $15,000 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries — $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOSOM BUDDIES BREAST CANCER SUPPORT INC — $11,200 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM — $10,400 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL KIDS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetWYOMING SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc — $8,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMiami University Foundation — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRASS RIVER NATURAL AREA INC — $7,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSAVED BY ZADE — $6,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOLS OFFER SUPPORT INC — $4,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMuddy Paws Rescue — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THERE WITH CARE
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds MIRAKIND
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause
  • Who funds THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT
  • Who funds AVOW Hospice Inc
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC
  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
  • Who funds ANGELS' PLACE
  • Who funds Avow Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Northwood University
  • Who funds Michigan Tech Fund
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC
  • Who funds THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL KIDS INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ELK RAPIDS DISTRICT LIBRARY
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS
  • Who funds ATTENTION INC
  • Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS
  • Who funds THE BARN FOR EQUINE LEARNING
  • Who funds CASS TECH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOC
  • Who funds Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
  • Who funds BOSOM BUDDIES BREAST CANCER SUPPORT INC
  • Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM
  • Who funds SPECIAL KIDS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI21.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Frey Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Siebenthaler Foundation · Feeding America West Michigan · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · American Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shannon Family Charitable Fdn Fifth Third funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 46%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc46% of income from government
  • Avow Hospice Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph