Skip to content
Shannon Family Charitable Fdn Fifth Third at a glance

· Private foundation

Shannon Family Charitable Fdn Fifth Third

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$341k
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$623kHealth$519kEnvironment$263kHousing & Shelter$212kAnimals$136kEducation$125kYouth Development$96kFood & Nutrition$81kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $88k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $253k
$3,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THERE WITH CARE$30,000
PAWS WITH A CAUSE$21,750
MIRAKIND$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE ELK RAPIDS DISTRICT$20,000
GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY$17,000
MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM$15,000
AVOW HOSPICE$15,000
ST MATHEWS HOUSE INC$15,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$13,000
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA$13,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF COLLIER COUNTY$13,000
KIDS FOOD BASKET$10,000
CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT$10,000
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR$10,000
ANGEL'S PLACE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $668k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%WOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC: $10k → 11%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $30k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $27k → 10%ATTENTION INC: $4k → 12%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $30k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $22k → 10%ATTENTION INC: $4k → 12%WOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC: $5k → 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $22k → 10%TGTHR: $4k → 12%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $16k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $12k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $11k → 10%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $5k → 10%THERE WITH CARE: $45k → 12%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $10k → 8%THERE WITH CARE: $44k → 12%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $10k → 8%THERE WITH CARE: $40k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $32k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $32k → 12%ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $4k → 11%THERE WITH CARE: $30k → 12%ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $4k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $4k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $4k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $3k → 11%AVOW HOSPICE: $30k → 10%SPECIAL KIDS INC: $5k → 21%AVOW HOSPICE: $30k → 10%REVIVE AND THRIVE PROJECT: $2k → 11%SPECIAL KIDS INC: $5k → 21%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%AVOW HOSPICE: $25k → 10%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%AVOW HOSPICE: $15k → 10%FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $2k → 21%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $10k → 8%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $10k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $18k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $10k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $10k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $5k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $5k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
CO
MD
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 56 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

56 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
28

Total granted

$2.0M
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+22%

Still filing today

66%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THERE WITH CARE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $254k · revenue +2%
  • GT
    GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $161k · revenue +230%
  • PW
    Paws With A Cause
    7× · 2019–2025 · $112k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • MC
    MIRAKIND c/o Miradx
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
  • CA
    CANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • WS
    WYOMING SCHOOL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
2
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
3
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
Michigan Animal Rescue League

The mission of the michigan animal rescue league is to provide the highest quality of life to dogs and cats through rescue, medical care, socialization and behavioral support, short- and long-term sanctuary, adoption, and community…

Animals
6
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
7
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
8
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
9
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals
10
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
11
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
12
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Food Basket Inc; the most unlike its peers is Broken Shovels Farm and Sanctuary School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/64
Grantees still filing
43/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THERE WITH CARE: $254,000 · Human ServicesTHERE WITH CAREPaws With A Cause: $111,750 · Human ServicesPaws With A CauseTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $110,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROITAVOW Hospice Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesAVOW Hospice IncANGELS' PLACE: $53,000 · Human ServicesANGELS' PLACEWOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC: $28,600 · Human Services+8 more: $82,100 · Human Services+8 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $78,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONALTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $73,000 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORI…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $52,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHI…COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,500 · OtherTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $75,000 · OtherTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAMKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $77,000 · OtherKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC+52 more: $291,856 · Other+52 moreMIRAKIND: $136,000 · HealthMIRAKINDAvow Foundation Inc: $40,000 · HealthAvow Foundation…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $21,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…SPECIAL KIDS INC: $20,500 · HealthSPECIAL KIDS IN…CEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 · HealthCEREBRAL PALSY …THE BARN FOR EQUINE LEARNING: $16,000 · HealthDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $13,500 · Health+5 more: $38,000 · Health+5 moreGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $160,500 · Environment+1 more: $1,500 · EnvironmentST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS: $16,500 · Housing & ShelterNorthwood University: $35,000 · EducationMichigan Tech Fund: $33,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE ELK RAPIDS DISTRICT LIBRARY: $20,000 · EducationCASS TECH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOC: $15,000 · EducationMiami University Foundation: $8,000 · EducationSCHOOLS OFFER SUPPORT INC: $4,000 · EducationPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $80,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC: $19,500 · AnimalsSAVED BY ZADE: $6,000 · Animals+2 more: $5,000 · Animals
Human Services$739,450Other$677,356Health$302,000Environment$162,000Housing & Shelter$116,500Education$115,000Animals$110,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHERE WITH CARE: $254,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $160,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMIRAKIND: $136,000 over 6y, 67% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $111,750 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $110,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $100,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAVOW Hospice Inc: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $80,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $77,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $75,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $73,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetANGELS' PLACE: $53,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAvow Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNorthwood University: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMichigan Tech Fund: $33,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC: $28,600 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $22,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL KIDS INC: $20,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ELK RAPIDS DISTRICT LIBRARY: $20,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC: $19,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS: $17,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetATTENTION INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS: $16,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARN FOR EQUINE LEARNING: $16,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetCASS TECH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOC: $15,000 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOSOM BUDDIES BREAST CANCER SUPPORT INC: $11,200 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $10,400 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWYOMING SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL KIDS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc: $8,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMiami University Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRASS RIVER NATURAL AREA INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSAVED BY ZADE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOLS OFFER SUPPORT INC: $4,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMuddy Paws Rescue: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MIRAKIND ↗
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds AVOW Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS' PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Avow Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Northwood University ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Tech Fund ↗
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ELK RAPIDS DISTRICT LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KENYAN ORPHANS ↗
  • Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ATTENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS ↗
  • Who funds THE BARN FOR EQUINE LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds CASS TECH HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries ↗
  • Who funds BOSOM BUDDIES BREAST CANCER SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Frey FoundationGrand Rapids Communit…Siebenthaler Foundati…Feeding America West …Michigan Health Endow…The Richard M Schulze…Collier Community Fou…American Gift FundGe Aerospace Foundati…The Pfizer Foundation…The Ayco Charitable F…
Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI21.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Frey Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Siebenthaler Foundation · Feeding America West Michigan · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · American Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shannon Family Charitable Fdn Fifth Third funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shannon Family Charitable Fdn Fifth Third. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Avow Hospice Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shannon Family Charitable Fdn Fifth Third’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home