· Private foundation
Shacter Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k36 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UUCJ Capital Campaign | $10,000 |
| The Sanctuary on 8th Street | $5,000 |
| WJCT | $4,300 |
| SPAR | $4,000 |
| VCRS (Valley Community for Recycling Solutions) | $2,500 |
| Camp Fiesta | $2,500 |
| UUCJ | $2,500 |
| FSCJ Foundation | $2,000 |
| The Community Foundation-Woman's Giving Alliance | $1,500 |
| ElevateHer | $1,170 |
| Historic St Elmo & Chalk Creek Caynon Inc | $1,170 |
| IM Sulzbacher Center | $1,000 |
| Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra | $1,000 |
| Bellowing Acres Inc | $1,000 |
| Save the Children | $560 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
49 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCAMP FIESTA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +82%
- VCVALLEY COMMUNITY FOR RECYCLING SOLUTIONS3× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +43%
- ISIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- JUJacksonville University Sustainibility Grantone grant, 2019 · $3k
- HCHOPE COMMUNITIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +109%
- JCJacksonville Chamber Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +78%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…
The north carolina conservation network supports, trains, and coordinates diverse groups and directly advocates to achieve equitable and sustainable solutions for our environment.
Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.
To advance education, awareness, and scientifically supported solutions to restore and protect marine ecosystems and our way of life for future generations.
The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…
To promote visitation to florida by strengthening florida's share of the global travel market with the goal of maximizing the economic impact of travel and tourism to florida.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Florida Springs, River, and Aquifer protection
Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.
Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wjct Inc and the most unlike its peers is Murray Hill Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WJCT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP FIESTA INC ↗
- Who funds BIOTECTURE PLANET EARTH INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY COMMUNITY FOR RECYCLING SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds IM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE SANCTUARY OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds WJCT INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds MURRAY HILL MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds elevateHER ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville Symphony Association Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville Chamber Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Csx Foundation Inc · The Haskell Foundation · Pga Tour Inc · The Schultz Foundation Inc · Jwb Cares Inc · The Gate Foundation Inc · Dubow Family Foundation Inc · The Maryellen S Willis Charitable Trust · Arthur V Davis Foundation Pf #3 · Colorado Gives Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Shacter Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc — 23% of income from government
- Jacksonville Chamber Foundation Inc — 15% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Shacter Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Shacter Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.