· Private foundation
Jwb Cares Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| READ USA INC | $5,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF JACKSONVILLE | $1,500 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA | $1,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA NORTHEAST REGION | $280 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $100 |
| UNITED WAY NORTHEAST FLORIDA | $86 |
| SEAMARK RANCH INC | $80 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $80 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $70 |
| JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY | $60 |
| TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION | $60 |
| BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION | $50 |
| FEEDING NORTHEAST FLORIDA | $50 |
| SOLES BY GRACE | $50 |
| JASMYN | $40 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
K9S FOR WARRIORS INC5× · 2018–2023 · $728k · revenue +118%- JHJACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC5× · 2018–2025 · $2k · revenue +9%
- SJST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC4× · 2018–2023 · $2k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- AUAVAILABLE UPON REQUESTone grant, 2020 · $105k
- MMMERA'S MISSION INCone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
- VCVyStar Credit Unionone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Organization mission: florida's children first is a non-profit, nonpartisan, independent advocacy organization committed to protecting and advancing the rights of children and youth impacted by the child welfare, juvenile justice, and…
Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…
Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
Our mission is to provide exceptional dialysis care and services to individuals with end-stage kidney disease throughout central florida. we are dedicated to expanding access to treatment and ensuring all those in need receive quality…
To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.
The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Central & Northern Florida and the most unlike its peers is Mera's Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 154 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds READ USA INC ↗
- Who funds MERA'S MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds VyStar Credit Union ↗
- Who funds HOPESTART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds CHANGING HOMELESSNESS INC ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northeast Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds Rethreaded Inc ↗
- Who funds FOURTH AND GOLD INC ↗
- Who funds The Catholic Foundation of Central Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds FUR SISTERS FUREVER URS RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH CURE SARCOMA ↗
- Who funds TRAVEL MATTERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE PARENT HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Pga Tour Inc · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · Crowley Cares Foundation · Csx Foundation Inc · The Gate Foundation Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Lewis Greenwood Foundation · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jwb Cares Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Changing Homelessness Inc — 84% of income from government
- Hubbard House Inc — 42% of income from government
- Chadd Inc Children and Adults With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder — 31% of income from government
- Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc — 23% of income from government
- Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
- Operation New Hope Inc — 13% of income from government
- Center for Child Counseling Inc — 8% of income from government
- Farm Share Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Groundwork Jacksonville Inc — 3% of income from government
- Lifesouth Community Blood Centers Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way of Northeast Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
- Read Usa Inc — 1% of income from government
- Clara White Mission Inc — 1% of income from government
- Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children — 0% of income from government
- VyStar Credit Union — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
- St Johns Country Day School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jwb Cares Inc?
Find your warmest path to Jwb Cares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.