Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sgl Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$853kRecreation & Sports$727kReligion$626kHealth$549kHuman Services$444kYouth Development$244kPhilanthropy$155kInternational$104kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$903k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MHHS FOUNDATION$57,500
Individual grant recipient$49,277
TEXAS NEW COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$25,500
BACTERIA BEYOND BORDERS INC$25,000
LDN RESEARCH TRUST$16,000
NCPA FOUNDATION$15,000
MONTGOMERY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$12,200
MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK$11,500
NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACIST ASSOCIATION$10,500
A JOYFUL LIFE FOUNDATION$10,500
ALLIANCE PHARMACY CO$10,000
FAMILY LEGACY$5,610
TRUSSVILLE CITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
KIDS MEALS INC$4,500
DREAM ACADEMY FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $321k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LOVE FOSTERS HOPE: $100k → 9%STREET GRACE: $500 → 9%AUTISM MEETS FAITH: $500 → 16%7MORE: $50k → 9%HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $50k → 16%7MORE: $10k → 9%7MORE: $10k → 9%KIDS MEALS INC: $3k → 16%MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES: $15k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 9%LOVE FOSTERS HOPE: $3k → 9%MARRIAGE REVOLUTION: $3k → 9%LOVE FOSTERS HOPE: $500 → 9%TEXAS NEW COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $26k → 9%TEXAS NEW COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $25k → 9%KIDS MEALS INC: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
KY
VA
AZ
AR
TN
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Sgl Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Sgl Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 20 repeat orgs$857k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
59

Total granted

$2.8M
$711k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

60%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $147k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalFood & NutritionReligionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    SKY RANCHES INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $725k · revenue +44%
  • TW
    The Woodlands Christian Academy
    5× · 2018–2025 · $596k · revenue +93%
  • LF
    Love Fosters Hope
    3× · 2018–2025 · $104k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $125k
  • DC
    DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +27%
  • MH
    Memorial Hermann Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +158%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
2
Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County

A local united christian organization and ministry dedicated to providing love, hope, respect and a new beginning for the homeless, offering a holistic care program that leads to true lasting healing.

3
Meals On Wheels Ministry Inc

Empowers older and disabled adults to live independentlly in thier own homes by providing nutritious home-delivered meals, safety checks, socialization, and community connection, which result in an enhanced quality of life and purpose as…

Food & Nutrition
4
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
5
Houston Christian Foundation dba National Christian Foundation Houston

As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

6
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health
7
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
8
Meals On Wheels Montgomery County

To foster the independence and dignity of homebound seniors in montgomery county by providing them with nutritious meals, transportation, and caring connections.

9
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Central Texas Inc

To provide lodging and support services to families with critically ill or injured children.

Health
10
Memorial Assistance Ministries

MAM partners with hardworking Houstonians to build stable lives and hope-filled futures. Through education, training, and community connection, we enhance economic mobility and holistic health across the region.

Human Services
11
Miracle Hill Ministries Inc

Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.

Human Services
12
His Story Coaching and Counseling

Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Lazarus Inc and the most unlike its peers is One Day Closer Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%9%<5yr16%15%5–10yr20%30%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr10%15%35–55yr13%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr10%9%35–55yr13%43%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/52
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,752

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
22/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SKY RANCHES INC — $724,779 · OtherSKY RANCHES INCThe Woodlands Christian Academy — $595,838 · OtherThe Woodlands Christian AcademyMATTHEW 10 — $325,500 · OtherMATTHEW 10MHHS FOUNDATION — $257,500 · OtherMHHS FOUNDATIONWOODSEDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH — $230,000 · OtherWOODSEDGE COMMUNITY CHURCHABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $200,000 · OtherABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYYOUTH WITH A MISSION — $168,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $125,000 · Other+72 more — $691,968 · Other+72 moreLove Fosters Hope — $103,500 · Human ServicesLove Fost…7 More Inc — $70,000 · Human Services7 More In…TEXAS NEW COMMUNITY ALLIANCE — $50,500 · Human ServicesTEXAS NEW…DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesDEPELCHIN…MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES — $15,000 · Human Services+7 more — $34,500 · Human Services+7 moreMemorial Hermann Foundation — $50,000 · HealthTEXAS PODIATRIC MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · HealthHOPE FAMILY CARE MINISTRIES INC — $10,500 · Health+1 more — $3,000 · HealthMontgomery County Community Foundation — $92,500 · PhilanthropyNETWORK FOR GOOD — $62,500 · Public Safety & Disaster+2 more — $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 · InternationalTHE MERCY MATERNITY HOUSE INC — $10,000 · InternationalMISSION LAZARUS INC — $10,000 · InternationalATTACK POVERTY — $3,000 · International+1 more — $500 · International
Other$3,318,585Human Services$323,500Health$103,500Philanthropy$92,500Public Safety & Disaster$63,500Community Improvement$50,000International$48,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSKY RANCHES INC — $724,779 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetThe Woodlands Christian Academy — $595,838 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLove Fosters Hope — $103,500 over 3y, 19% of budgetMontgomery County Community Foundation — $92,500 over 4y, 4.5% of budget7 More Inc — $70,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $62,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Legacy Missions International — $55,610 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS NEW COMMUNITY ALLIANCE — $50,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS PODIATRIC MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMontgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSUPPORT OUR SOLDIERS — $12,500 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHE MERCY MATERNITY HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION LAZARUS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSt Hope Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFINISHING TOUCH MINISTRIES — $5,645 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetSNOWDROP FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHANDS OF JUSTICE — $3,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetATTACK POVERTY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUNCHES OF LOVE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMarriage Revolution — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORKING RANCH COWBOYS ASSOCIATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENERATION ONE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUTISM MEETS FAITH — $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMissions on Wheels Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SKY RANCHES INC
  • Who funds The Woodlands Christian Academy
  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Love Fosters Hope
  • Who funds Montgomery County Community Foundation
  • Who funds 7 More Inc
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD
  • Who funds Family Legacy Missions International
  • Who funds TEXAS NEW COMMUNITY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER
  • Who funds WOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC
  • Who funds Memorial Hermann Foundation
  • Who funds Harding University Inc
  • Who funds ALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds TEXAS PODIATRIC MEDICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES
  • Who funds MIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Montgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc
  • Who funds TEXAS PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SUPPORT OUR SOLDIERS
  • Who funds HOPE FAMILY CARE MINISTRIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX27.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Junior League of the Woodlands Inc · Wcn Cares · The Woodforest Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Houston · Baker Hughes Foundation · Marta and Stephen Pate Family Foundation · Apricity Foundation · Montgomery County Community Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sgl Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph