Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seymour a Cohen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$231k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$700kHuman Services$391kHealth$303kReligion$83kPhilanthropy$51kInternational$46kPublic Benefit$40kArts & Culture$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
$4,900
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$135,000
METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES$50,000
CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING$15,000
CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY$5,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$5,000
LINK UNLIMITED SCHOLARS$5,000
RAVINIA$4,900
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO WOMEN'S BOARD$3,000
LIFE LONG MEDICAL CARE$2,500
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,926
HHP LIFT$600
LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $379k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $80k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $51k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $35k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $33k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 23 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$1.6M
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+14%

Still filing today

52%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    7× · 2018–2024 · $428k · revenue +52%
  • MF
    Metropolitan Family Services
    9× · 2017–2025 · $379k · revenue +332%
  • BA
    BEACON ACADEMY A MONTESSORI HIGH SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $161k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • ST MARYS UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • LC
    LEUKEMIA CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
2
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
3
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
4
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
The Family Institute

Our mission is to strengthen and heal families and individuals from all walks of life through clinical service, education and research.

—
9
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
10
Roosevelt University

Roosevelt university is an independent, non-profit, metropolitan university and national leader in educating socially conscious citizens for active and dedicated lives as leaders in their professions and their communities. the university's…

—
11
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Youth Centers; the most unlike its peers is St Marys University of Minnesota. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Chicago: $428,160 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoBEACON ACADEMY A MONTESSORI HIGH SCHOOL: $161,000 · EducationBEACON ACADEMY A MONTESSORI HIGH SCHOOLEmory University: $25,000 · Education+4 more: $25,347 · EducationCANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $255,000 · OtherCANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATIONCONGREGATION RODFEI ZEDEK: $69,015 · OtherCONGREGATION RODFEI ZEDEKEMORY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $40,000 · OtherEMORY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE…ST MARY'S COLLEGE: $20,000 · Other+21 more: $97,580 · Other+21 moreMetropolitan Family Services: $378,528 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family Servic…CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING INC: $46,169 · International+1 more: $1,500 · InternationalJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $39,085 · PhilanthropyMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $1,500 · PhilanthropyBETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 · Public BenefitGASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · HealthLIFELONG MEDICAL CARE: $2,500 · Health
Education$639,507Other$481,595Human Services$378,528International$47,669Philanthropy$40,585Public Benefit$40,000Health$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Chicago: $428,160 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $378,528 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBEACON ACADEMY A MONTESSORI HIGH SCHOOL: $161,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING INC: $46,169 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetBETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $39,085 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLINK Unlimited Scholars: $15,258 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST MARYS UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago State Foundation: $4,589 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIFELONG MEDICAL CARE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChicago Youth Centers: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetErikson Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
  • Who funds BEACON ACADEMY A MONTESSORI HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds BETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds LINK Unlimited Scholars ↗
  • Who funds GASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds Chicago State Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Michael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Youth Centers ↗
  • Who funds HHPLIFT ↗
  • Who funds Erikson Institute ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL20.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Circle of Service Foundation · The Robert Thomas Bobins Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seymour a Cohen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seymour a Cohen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seymour a Cohen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph