Skip to content

· Private foundation

Severson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$178k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.0MEducation$289kPhilanthropy$203kHuman Services$147kEnvironment$123kFood & Nutrition$63kHousing & Shelter$51kHealth$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$3,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$748k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Augustana University$100,000
First Lutheran Church$50,000
Westwood Lutheran Church$9,920
Habitat for Humanity$4,000
The Banquet$4,000
Pickerel Lake Conservancy$3,200
Sioux Falls Area Humane Society$2,000
Rise Early Learning Center$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
First Tee South Dakota$1,000
The Furniture Mission$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Sharing and Caring Hands: $5k → 11%Sharing and Caring Hands: $5k → 11%Sharing and Caring Hands: $250 → 11%The Furniture Mission: $1k → 9%The Furniture Mission: $1k → 9%The Furniture Mission: $1k → 9%Furniture Mission of South Dakota: $1k → 9%Furniture Mission of South Dakota: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 34 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
23

Total granted

$1.8M
$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+28%

Still filing today

47%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +79%
  • PL
    PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $117k · revenue +21% · 62% of their budget
  • RE
    Rise Early Learning Center
    5× · 2021–2025 · $75k · revenue +583%

Funded once

  • FN
    FLC Nokomis Child Care Center
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -1%
  • HC
    Hope Community Development Assoc
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
2
Lutheran Social Services Housing Inc

Lss housing will support the continued vitality of north dakota communities by providing housing and housing-related services.

—
3
Neighborhood Housing Services of Duluth One Roof Lending

To provide financing that will help people of lower income find, purchase, and fix their homes, for both single family homes as well as rental housing situations.

Community Improvement
4
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
5
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
6
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
7
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
8
Community Shares of Minnesota

The mission of community shares of minnesota is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota. community shares of minnesota accomplishes its mission by: supporting collective action to eliminate root causes of inequality and injustice;…

—
9
Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency

Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…

Human Services
10
Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota Inc

Habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community, and hope. through advocacy, collaboration, and leadership, hfh-mn advances the work of minnesota's habitat for humanity affiliates to create and preserve affordable…

—
11
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
12
Southwest Minnesota Housing Partnership

To partner with communities to develop places for people to call home so that people in southwest and south-central minnesota have access to dignified affordable housing, and thriving, inclusive and equitable communities.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners; the most unlike its peers is Northside Boxing Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
25/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUTHER SEMINARY: $260,330 · OtherLUTHER SEMINARYCelebrate First Lutheran Church: $250,883 · OtherCelebrate First Lutheran ChurchFIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $241,000 · OtherFIRST LUTHERAN CHURCHFIRST LUTHERN CHURCH: $202,500 · OtherFIRST LUTHERN CHURCHFLC Nokomis Child Care Center: $100,000 · OtherFLC Nokomis Child Care CenterIndividual grant recipient: $77,500 · OtherRise Early Learning Center: $75,350 · OtherUnited Way of Fargo: $75,000 · OtherWESTWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH: $71,420 · Other+34 more: $169,370 · Other+34 moreAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $178,000 · EducationAUGUSTANA U…FRIENDS OF EDUCATION: $20,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF …SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $9,000 · EducationPICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY: $117,200 · EnvironmentGASPARILLA ISL CONSER & IMPROVE ASSN: $5,500 · EnvironmentTHE BANQUET: $34,500 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $28,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionHope Community Development Assoc: $15,000 · Community ImprovementUNSEEN: $9,500 · Community ImprovementSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $10,250 · Human ServicesFURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $5,000 · Human ServicesUNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $800 · Human ServicesSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · PhilanthropyBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHSIDE BOXING CLUB INC: $1,250 · Philanthropy
Other$1,523,353Education$207,000Environment$122,700Food & Nutrition$63,000Community Improvement$24,500Human Services$16,050Philanthropy$14,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $178,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY: $117,200 over 7y, 62% of budgetRise Early Learning Center: $75,350 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetTHE BANQUET: $34,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF EDUCATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHope Community Development Assoc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $14,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER SIOUX FALLS: $13,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $10,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNSEEN: $9,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA CASS CLAY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBridging Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHSIDE BOXING CLUB INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOPPET FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES: $270 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Rise Early Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds THE BANQUET ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds Hope Community Development Assoc ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER SIOUX FALLS ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNSEEN ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHURCHES UNITED ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC ↗
  • Who funds GASPARILLA ISL CONSER & IMPROVE ASSN ↗
  • Who funds FURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds YWCA CASS CLAY ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Financial for LutheransMN18.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · The Graco Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Jerstad Family Foundation · First Lutheran Church Foundation · Tenfold Foundation Inc · The Robert and Rita Elmen Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Severson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Severson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Severson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph