Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Severson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$178k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$1.0MEducation$289kPhilanthropy$203kHuman Services$147kEnvironment$123kFood & Nutrition$63kHousing & Shelter$51kHealth$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$3,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$748k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Augustana University$100,000
First Lutheran Church$50,000
Westwood Lutheran Church$9,920
The Banquet$4,000
Habitat for Humanity$4,000
Pickerel Lake Conservancy$3,200
Sioux Falls Area Humane Society$2,000
Rise Early Learning Center$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
The Furniture Mission$1,000
First Tee South Dakota$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Sharing and Caring Hands: $5k → 11%Sharing and Caring Hands: $5k → 11%Sharing and Caring Hands: $250 → 11%The Furniture Mission: $1k → 9%Furniture Mission of South Dakota: $1k → 9%The Furniture Mission: $1k → 9%Furniture Mission of South Dakota: $1k → 9%The Furniture Mission: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 34 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
23

Total granted

$1.8M
$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+28%

Still filing today

47%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +79%
  • PL
    PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $117k · revenue +21% · 62% of their budget
  • RE
    Rise Early Learning Center
    5× · 2021–2025 · $75k · revenue +583%

Funded once

  • FN
    FLC Nokomis Child Care Center
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -1%
  • HC
    Hope Community Development Assoc
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

2
Lutheran Social Services Housing Inc

Lss housing will support the continued vitality of north dakota communities by providing housing and housing-related services.

3
Neighborhood Housing Services of Duluth One Roof Lending

To provide financing that will help people of lower income find, purchase, and fix their homes, for both single family homes as well as rental housing situations.

Community Improvement
4
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
5
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

6
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

7
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
8
Community Shares of Minnesota

The mission of community shares of minnesota is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota. community shares of minnesota accomplishes its mission by: supporting collective action to eliminate root causes of inequality and injustice;…

9
Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency

Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…

Human Services
10
Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota Inc

Habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community, and hope. through advocacy, collaboration, and leadership, hfh-mn advances the work of minnesota's habitat for humanity affiliates to create and preserve affordable…

11
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

12
Southwest Minnesota Housing Partnership

To partner with communities to develop places for people to call home so that people in southwest and south-central minnesota have access to dignified affordable housing, and thriving, inclusive and equitable communities.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is Northside Boxing Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Community Arts OrganizationsProfessional Membership Ass…Rotary Club FoundationsSenior Care & Housing Servi…Community Orchestra & Ensem…Christian Youth and Communi…Charter Schools and Early C…Social Justice Advocacy Org…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 31. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr11%3%5–10yr13%15%10–20yr12%27%20–35yr22%36%35–55yr25%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr11%6%5–10yr13%11%10–20yr12%6%20–35yr22%62%35–55yr25%16%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
6%
381/5,940

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
25/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LUTHER SEMINARY — $260,330 · OtherLUTHER SEMINARYCelebrate First Lutheran Church — $250,883 · OtherCelebrate First Lutheran ChurchFIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH — $241,000 · OtherFIRST LUTHERAN CHURCHFIRST LUTHERN CHURCH — $202,500 · OtherFIRST LUTHERN CHURCHFLC Nokomis Child Care Center — $100,000 · OtherFLC Nokomis Child Care CenterIndividual grant recipient — $77,500 · OtherRise Early Learning Center — $75,350 · OtherUnited Way of Fargo — $75,000 · OtherWESTWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH — $71,420 · Other+34 more — $169,370 · Other+34 moreAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION — $178,000 · EducationAUGUSTANA U…FRIENDS OF EDUCATION — $20,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF …SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $9,000 · EducationPICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY — $117,200 · EnvironmentGASPARILLA ISL CONSER & IMPROVE ASSN — $5,500 · EnvironmentTHE BANQUET — $34,500 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $28,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $500 · Food & NutritionHope Community Development Assoc — $15,000 · Community ImprovementUNSEEN — $9,500 · Community ImprovementSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $10,250 · Human ServicesFURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA — $5,000 · Human ServicesUNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $800 · Human ServicesSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · PhilanthropyBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC — $6,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHSIDE BOXING CLUB INC — $1,250 · Philanthropy
Other$1,523,353Education$207,000Environment$122,700Food & Nutrition$63,000Community Improvement$24,500Human Services$16,050Philanthropy$14,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION — $178,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY — $117,200 over 7y, 62% of budgetRise Early Learning Center — $75,350 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetTHE BANQUET — $34,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF EDUCATION — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHope Community Development Assoc — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $14,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER SIOUX FALLS — $13,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $10,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNSEEN — $9,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED — $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA CASS CLAY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA — $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBridging Inc — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHSIDE BOXING CLUB INC — $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOPPET FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES — $270 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds Rise Early Learning Center
  • Who funds THE BANQUET
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF EDUCATION
  • Who funds Hope Community Development Assoc
  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER SIOUX FALLS
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC
  • Who funds UNSEEN
  • Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHURCHES UNITED
  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC
  • Who funds GASPARILLA ISL CONSER & IMPROVE ASSN
  • Who funds YWCA CASS CLAY
  • Who funds FURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA
  • Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Financial for LutheransMN18.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · The Graco Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Jerstad Family Foundation · First Lutheran Church Foundation · Tenfold Foundation Inc · The Robert and Rita Elmen Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Severson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph