Skip to content

South Dakota · Nonprofit

PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY

PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY (South Dakota) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $163,050 to it, the largest being Severson Family Foundation ($117,200). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$141k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$163k
Net assets
$432k
1/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 62%
01What it does

What Pickerel Lake Conservancy does

Mission

Protect the water quality natural resources and ecosystem of Pickerel Lake Day County South Dakota

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Curly Leaf Pondweed Study and Services

    $17,905 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2023 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $17,905.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($117k) Expenses 100 ($12k) Net assets 100 ($176k)2022 Revenue 27 ($32k) Expenses 140 ($17k) Net assets 108 ($191k)2023 Revenue 139 ($163k) Expenses 222 ($27k) Net assets 191 ($337k)2024 Revenue 121 ($141k) Expenses 363 ($45k) Net assets 245 ($432k)
2021202220232024
Revenue (121)Expenses (363)Net assets (245)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $191k to $337k (+77%).

$176k
$191k
$337k
$432k
2021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

68% of PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$104k
’21
$14k
’22
$135k
’23
$96k
’24
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $1k → $100k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
1
2
2

2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 28% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

28% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY.

72%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside South Dakota, across 1 state in all.

MN

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’23
South Dakota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $46k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 4,264 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin68% · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,264 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Dakota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

AL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY?
PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY (South Dakota) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $163,050 to it, the largest being Severson Family Foundation ($117,200). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $163,050 in grants to PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY?
Severson Family Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $117,200 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PICKEREL LAKE CONSERVANCY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Dakota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Pickerel Lake Conservancy →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing