Skip to content

· Public charity

Service Year Exchange Inc

Service year alliance is an organization relentlessly pursuing a bold vision making a year of service a common expectation and opportunity for all young americans as a way to tackle important challenges while transforming their own lives.

$348k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$640kYouth Development$474kEducation$387kEmployment$225kEnvironment$138kPhilanthropy$117kHousing & Shelter$64kCivil Rights$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $324,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $348,212 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $24,212 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $316k
$20,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USERVE UTAH (STATE OF UTAH CULTURAL AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT)$45,000
CIVICWELL$45,000
REPAIR THE WORLD$25,000
THE SERVICE COLLABORATIVE OF WNY$25,000
CENTER FOR INTERFAITH COOPERATION INC$25,000
CAMPUS COMPACT$20,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS SAN ANTONIO INC$20,000
UPSTATE GREENWAYS AND TRAILS ALLIANCE$20,000
AMERICORPS CENTRAL TEXAS$15,000
CONSERVATION LEGACY FOR CONSERVATION CORPS NORTH CAROLINA$14,000
OPERATION FRESH START INC$14,000
BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC$12,000
STATE OF MAINE VOLUNTEER MAINE$12,000
SUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE$12,000
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PUBLIC ALLIES INC: $56k → 17%PUBLIC ALLIES INC: $19k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
KY
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 22 repeat orgs$744k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
21

Total granted

$1.4M
$517k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+30%

Still filing today

82%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $227k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEmploymentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE SERVICE COLLABORATIVE OF WNY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $125k · revenue +12%
  • TC
    The Corps Network
    3× · 2017–2021 · $120k · revenue +130%
  • REINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $77k · revenue -23%
  • RM
    READING & MATH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
  • NS
    NC STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
4
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
7
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
8
Citizen Schools Inc

In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…

Education
9
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
10
College Summit Inc

College summit, inc. d/b/a peerforward (peerforward)'s mission is to unleash the power of positive peer influence to transform the lives of youth living in low-income communities by connecting them to college and careers. in low-income…

Education
11
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Year Inc; the most unlike its peers is Reading & Math Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
28/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY DEV CORP: $190,000 · OtherGREATER ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY DEV CORPCITY OF SAN JOSE: $100,000 · OtherCITY OF SAN JOSEBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN INDIANA INC: $77,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN INDIANA INCUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONAMERICORPS CENTRAL TEXAS: $60,000 · OtherAMERICORPS CENTRAL TEXASAMERICAN YOUTHWORKS: $60,000 · OtherAMERICAN YOUTHWORKSNC STATE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherSTATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $45,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $50,000 · Other+22 more: $324,575 · Other+22 moreREADING & MATH FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationREADING & MATH FO…BEREA COLLEGE: $75,000 · EducationBEREA COLLEGETrustees of Tufts College: $65,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts…READING AND MATH INC: $57,778 · EducationREADING AND MATH …Education Alliance for New Hampshire: $25,000 · EducationEducation Allianc…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO: $20,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SC…CAMPUS COMPACT: $20,000 · EducationCAMPUS COMPACT+1 more: $7,225 · EducationREINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Community ImprovementREINVENT STOC…PHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC: $85,000 · Community ImprovementPHILADELPHIA …REPAIR THE WORLD: $25,000 · Community ImprovementREPAIR THE WO…SUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE: $18,222 · Community ImprovementSUSTAINABILIT…COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN: $15,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ECO…+1 more: $7,778 · Community ImprovementTHE SERVICE COLLABORATIVE OF WNY: $125,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SERVICE…PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROP…UNITED WAY ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …UNITED WAY OF RACINE COUNTY INC: $14,450 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe Corps Network: $120,000 · EmploymentYOUTHBUILD GLOBAL INC: $25,000 · EmploymentOPERATION FRESH START INC: $14,000 · EmploymentCivicwell: $51,222 · Public BenefitNATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC: $50,000 · Public BenefitPUBLIC ALLIES INC: $75,000 · Human Services
Other$1,031,575Education$345,003Community Improvement$251,000Philanthropy$224,450Employment$159,000Public Benefit$101,222Human Services$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY DEV CORP: $190,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetTHE SERVICE COLLABORATIVE OF WNY: $125,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetThe Corps Network: $120,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetREINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN INDIANA INC: $77,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPUBLIC ALLIES INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTHWORKS: $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREADING AND MATH INC: $57,778 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCivicwell: $51,222 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCherry Street Services Inc: $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Interfaith Cooperation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetREPAIR THE WORLD: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTHBUILD GLOBAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEducation Alliance for New Hampshire: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetGRID ALTERNATIVES: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMPUS COMPACT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUPSTATE GREENWAYS AND TRAILS ALLIANCE: $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE: $18,222 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF RACINE COUNTY INC: $14,450 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSt Mark Youth Enrichment: $14,450 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHARLAN COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $14,450 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetBRYANT ARMS DBA RICHARD ALLEN APTS: $14,450 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetOPERATION FRESH START INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONSERVATION CORPS: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRURAL ACTION INC: $7,778 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYEAR ONE INC: $6,222 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Corps NetworkDC17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Corps Network · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Aspen Institute Inc · National Park Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · Serveminnesota · The California Endowment · Columbus Foundation · Youthbuild Global Inc · Trustees of Tufts College

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Service Year Exchange Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Service Year Exchange Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Youthbuild Global Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Campus Compact: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Service Year Exchange’s filings →

More from the funding graph