· Public charity
Service Year Exchange Inc
Service year alliance is an organization relentlessly pursuing a bold vision making a year of service a common expectation and opportunity for all young americans as a way to tackle important challenges while transforming their own lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $324,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $348,212 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,212 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $316k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USERVE UTAH (STATE OF UTAH CULTURAL AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT) | $45,000 |
| CIVICWELL | $45,000 |
| REPAIR THE WORLD | $25,000 |
| THE SERVICE COLLABORATIVE OF WNY | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR INTERFAITH COOPERATION INC | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS SAN ANTONIO INC | $20,000 |
| UPSTATE GREENWAYS AND TRAILS ALLIANCE | $20,000 |
| CAMPUS COMPACT | $20,000 |
| AMERICORPS CENTRAL TEXAS | $15,000 |
| OPERATION FRESH START INC | $14,000 |
| CONSERVATION LEGACY FOR CONSERVATION CORPS NORTH CAROLINA | $14,000 |
| SUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE | $12,000 |
| STATE OF MAINE VOLUNTEER MAINE | $12,000 |
| BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC | $12,000 |
| UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY | $12,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $227k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE SERVICE COLLABORATIVE OF WNY2× · 2022–2024 · $125k · revenue +12%- TCThe Corps Network3× · 2017–2021 · $120k · revenue +109%
REINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +143%
Funded once
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN INDIANA INCone grant, 2023 · $77k · revenue -23%
- RMREADING & MATH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $75k
- NLNATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.
Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…
In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Year Inc and the most unlike its peers is Reading & Math Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY DEV CORP ↗
- Who funds THE SERVICE COLLABORATIVE OF WNY ↗
- Who funds The Corps Network ↗
- Who funds REINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC ALLIES INC ↗
- Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS ↗
- Who funds READING AND MATH INC ↗
- Who funds Civicwell ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Cherry Street Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Center for Interfaith Cooperation Inc ↗
- Who funds Education Alliance for New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds REPAIR THE WORLD ↗
- Who funds YOUTHBUILD GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds GRID ALTERNATIVES ↗
- Who funds CAMPUS COMPACT ↗
- Who funds UPSTATE GREENWAYS AND TRAILS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds St Mark Youth Enrichment ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF RACINE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BRYANT ARMS DBA RICHARD ALLEN APTS ↗
- Who funds HARLAN COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Corps Network · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Aspen Institute Inc · National Park Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · Serveminnesota · The California Endowment · Columbus Foundation · Youthbuild Global Inc · Trustees of Tufts College
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Service Year Exchange Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Youthbuild Global Inc — 69% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Campus Compact — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.