Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Corps Network

The Corps Network provides critical leadership to the Corps movement and our nations service and conservation corps as they harness the power of youth and young adults to tackle some of Americas greatest challenges and transform their own lives.

$8.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
24
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$14MYouth Development$10.0MEmployment$8.6MHuman Services$8.5MEducation$2.8MCommunity Improvement$514kPhilanthropy$486kAnimals$244kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 37 grants below total $8,296,313 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,756,326 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $460,013 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $159k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $2.9M
  • $250k+9 grants · $5.3M
$129,154
Median grant
24
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Northwest Youth Corps$1,009,825
Franklin's Promise Coalition$885,982
Green City Force$864,996
Greater Miami Service Corps$681,517
Conservation Legacy$607,610
Civic Works$362,844
GEM Environmental$292,672
American Youth Works$278,321
Heart of Oregon$275,232
greenspaces$241,754
Southern Utah University$222,801
PowerCorps PHL$221,348
PowerCorps Boston$217,710
Operation Fresh Start Inc$174,806
City of La Porte$163,224
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $9.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Green City Force: $865k → 20%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA - WESTERN DIVISION: $7k → 16%Franklin's Promise Coalition: $1.2M → 18%Western Colorado Conservation Corps: $147k → 11%GREEN CITY FORCE: $650k → 20%Franklin's Promise Coalition: $886k → 18%WESTERN COLORADO CONSERVATION CORPS: $136k → 11%Green City Force: $523k → 20%Franklin's Promise Coalition: $751k → 18%WESTERN COLORADO CONSERVATION CORPS: $112k → 11%GREEN CITY FORCE: $486k → 20%Franklin's Promise Coalition: $652k → 18%WESTERN COLORADO CONSERVATION CORPS: $111k → 11%Green City Force: $475k → 20%Franklin's Promise Coalition: $639k → 18%WESTERN COLORADO CONSERVATION CORPS: $109k → 11%GREEN CITY FORCE: $412k → 20%FRANKLIN'S PROMISE COALITION: $42k → 18%WESTERN COLORADO CONSERVATION CORPS: $109k → 11%GREEN CITY FORCE: $302k → 20%FRANKLIN'S PROMISE COALITION: $42k → 18%Western Colorado Conservation Corps: $71k → 11%GREEN CITY FORCE: $302k → 20%Western Colorado Conservation Corps: $36k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44M · 45 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
12

Total granted

$44M
$643k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+35%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentYouth DevelopmentEmploymentEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CONSERVATION LEGACY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.4M · revenue +161%
  • NY
    NORTHWEST YOUTH CORPS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +85%
  • FP
    FRANKLINS PROMISE COALITION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $4.2M · revenue +53% · 65% of their budget

Funded once

  • GY
    GREENING YOUTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $465k · revenue +35%
  • TS
    THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $91k · revenue +70%
  • ES
    Eastern Sierra Conservation Corpsgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue +241%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation Corps North Bay Inc

To develop youth and conserve natural resources for a resilient, sustainable, and equitable community.

Employment
2
Los Angeles Conservation Corps

The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.

Employment
3
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
4
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
5
Montana Conservation Corps Inc

Montana Conservation Corps (MCC) inspires young people through hands-on conservation service to be leaders, stewards of the land and engaged citizens who improve their communities.

Civil Rights
6
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
7
Groundwork Ohio River Valley Inc

To support the long-term revitalization and care of neighborhoods through local partnerships that equip residents, businesses and organizations to improve economic opportunity and community well-being.

Community Improvement
8
Adventure West Council Boy Scouts of America

The mission of the adventure west council, boy scouts of america, is to instill honor, integrity, and leadership in youth by engaging youth and families through fun, quality programs, outdoor experiences, and service to community.

—
9
San Francisco Conservation Corps

The San Francisco Conservation Corps offers young people opportunities to develop themselves by developing their academic abilities and marketable job skills while addressing community needs through service work

—
10
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
11
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
12
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Conservation Corps and the most unlike its peers is Limitless Vistas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Development Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/64
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,501

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/55
Grantees still filing
42/55
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHWEST YOUTH CORPS — $5,150,237 · EmploymentNORTHWEST YOUTH CORPSGREATER MIAMI SERVICE CORPS — $2,314,553 · EmploymentGREATER MIAMI SERVICE …OPERATION FRESH START INC — $1,377,505 · EmploymentOPERATION FRESH START …+2 more — $281,922 · EmploymentFRANKLINS PROMISE COALITION INC — $4,229,402 · Human ServicesFRANKLINS PROMISE COAL…GREEN CITY FORCE INC — $4,016,178 · Human ServicesGREEN CITY FORCE INCMESA YOUTH SERVICES INC — $830,909 · Human ServicesMESA YOUTH SERVICES IN…+1 more — $6,988 · Human ServicesCONSERVATION LEGACY — $6,378,563 · Youth DevelopmentCONSERVATION LEGACYCLIMB COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,173,722 · Youth DevelopmentCLIMB COMMUNITY DEVEL…ROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS — $542,240 · Youth DevelopmentROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH …COMMUNITY TRAINING WORKS INC — $482,328 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY TRAINING WO…+3 more — $132,807 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN YOUTHWORKS — $3,279,200 · OtherAMERICAN YOUTHWORKSUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,375,425 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSIT…EDUCATION WORKS INC — $824,215 · OtherEDUCATION WORKS INCSOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION 03-13-96 — $485,652 · OtherSOUTHERN UTAH UNIVER…New Jersey Youth Corps of Phillipsburg — $341,959 · OtherNative American Advancement Corporation — $280,256 · OtherISLES INC — $311,805 · Other+13 more — $1,466,557 · Other+13 moreVERMONT YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS INC — $968,275 · EnvironmentVERMONT YO…GREENSPACES INC — $594,055 · EnvironmentGREENSPACE…GREENING YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $464,882 · EnvironmentGREENING Y…Appalachian Mountain Club — $376,667 · EnvironmentAppalachia…YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS — $339,621 · EnvironmentYOUTH CONS…FRIENDS OF THE UPPER DELAWARE RIVER INC — $294,270 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF…G E M ENVIRONMENTAL NFP — $292,672 · EnvironmentG E M ENVI…DELAWARE CENTER FOR HORTICULTURE INC — $287,233 · EnvironmentDELAWARE C…NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT — $232,967 · EnvironmentNEW YORK R…+10 more — $389,060 · Environment+10 moreCIVIC WORKS INC — $2,518,669 · EducationCIVIC WORK…Limitless Vistas Inc — $903,136 · EducationLimitless …HOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC — $342,163 · EducationHOPEWORKS …CHILDREN FIRST AMERICA DELAWARE COUNTY — $284,599 · EducationCHILDREN F…+1 more — $10,000 · EducationSUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE — $708,153 · Community ImprovementGREAT LAKES COMMUNITY CONSERVATION CORPS INC — $631,915 · Community ImprovementPROMISE NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY — $295,847 · Community ImprovementBOSTON LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $217,710 · Community Improvement
Employment$9,124,217Human Services$9,083,477Youth Development$8,709,660Other$8,365,069Environment$4,239,702Education$4,058,567Community Improvement$1,853,625

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY — $6,378,563 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetNORTHWEST YOUTH CORPS — $5,150,237 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetFRANKLINS PROMISE COALITION INC — $4,229,402 over 7y, 65% of budgetGREEN CITY FORCE INC — $4,016,178 over 8y, 16% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTHWORKS — $3,279,200 over 8y, 12% of budgetCIVIC WORKS INC — $2,518,669 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetGREATER MIAMI SERVICE CORPS — $2,314,553 over 8y, 15% of budgetOPERATION FRESH START INC — $1,377,505 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetCLIMB COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,173,722 over 8y, 31% of budgetVERMONT YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS INC — $968,275 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetLimitless Vistas Inc — $903,136 over 7y, 45% of budgetMESA YOUTH SERVICES INC — $830,909 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetSUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE — $708,153 over 8y, 29% of budgetGREAT LAKES COMMUNITY CONSERVATION CORPS INC — $631,915 over 3y, 27% of budgetGREENSPACES INC — $594,055 over 4y, 20% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS — $542,240 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY TRAINING WORKS INC — $482,328 over 7y, 14% of budgetGREENING YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $464,882 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club — $376,667 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC — $342,163 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetYOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS — $339,621 over 4y, 10% of budgetISLES INC — $311,805 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPROMISE NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY — $295,847 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UPPER DELAWARE RIVER INC — $294,270 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetG E M ENVIRONMENTAL NFP — $292,672 over 1y, 31% of budgetDELAWARE CENTER FOR HORTICULTURE INC — $287,233 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST AMERICA DELAWARE COUNTY — $284,599 over 3y, 91% of budgetNative American Advancement Corporation — $280,256 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetHEART OF OREGON CORPS INC — $275,232 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetENVIRONMENT FOR THE AMERICAS INC — $243,602 over 2y, 12% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT — $232,967 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBOSTON LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $217,710 over 1y, 13% of budgetTHE WORK GROUP INC — $139,154 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetCITIZENS' CONSERVATION CORPS OF WV — $131,131 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS — $105,322 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican Conservation Experience — $91,649 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC — $91,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONSERVATION CORPS OF LONG BEACH — $89,624 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetONONDAGA EARTH CORPS INC — $76,176 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetGREAT BASIN INSTITUTE — $74,443 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONSERVATION CORPS — $69,024 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY — $57,166 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetKUPU — $33,563 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEarth Conservation Corps — $21,973 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetCENTRAL CONSERVATION INC — $19,050 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEastern Sierra Conservation Corps — $11,725 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetNEW BRUNSWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetYOUTHWORKS — $9,620 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONSERVATION LEGACY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST YOUTH CORPS ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLINS PROMISE COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN CITY FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS ↗
  • Who funds CIVIC WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI SERVICE CORPS ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FRESH START INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMB COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds Limitless Vistas Inc ↗
  • Who funds MESA YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES COMMUNITY CONSERVATION CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENSPACES INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY TRAINING WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENING YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS ↗
  • Who funds ISLES INC ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UPPER DELAWARE RIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds G E M ENVIRONMENTAL NFP ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE CENTER FOR HORTICULTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN FIRST AMERICA DELAWARE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Native American Advancement Corporation ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF OREGON CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENT FOR THE AMERICAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE WORK GROUP INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Fish and Wil…National Forest Found…National Park Foundat…The Nature ConservancyYouthbuild Global IncAmerican ForestsService Year Exchange…The Outdoor FoundationNational Environmenta…Colorado Youth Corps …National Recreation F…National Wildlife Fed…
National Fish and Wildlife FoundationDC40.2× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · National Forest Foundation · National Park Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · Youthbuild Global Inc · American Forests · Service Year Exchange Inc · The Outdoor Foundation · National Environmental Education and Training Foundation Inc · Colorado Youth Corps Association · National Recreation Foundation Incorporated · National Wildlife Federation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Corps Network funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Northwest Youth Corps — 100% of income from government
  • Civic Works Inc — 63% of income from government
  • Vermont Youth Conservation Corps Inc — 47% of income from government
  • The Work Group Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Greater Miami Service Corps — 36% of income from government
  • Native American Advancement Corporation — 35% of income from government
  • Heart of Oregon Corps Inc — 28% of income from government
  • Isles Inc — 21% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
  • Delaware Center for Horticulture Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Community Training Works Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home