Skip to content
Seminole Region Charity Golf Tournament Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Seminole Region Charity Golf Tournament Inc

To organize events and fundraisers to benefit various charities selected by the board.

$141k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$953kRecreation & Sports$315kInternational$200kEmployment$159kEducation$111kYouth Development$61kFood & Nutrition$38kPhilanthropy$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $99,357, the rows itemized in this filing. The $141,357 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$11,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$739k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FIRST TEE$16,400
CARING CHILDREN CLOTHING CHILDREN$14,557
SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE$11,400
GEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND$11,400
THE UNICORN CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC$11,400
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$11,400
FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC$11,400
4KIDS OF SOUTH FL$11,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $585k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CARING CHILDREN CLOTHING CHILDREN: $20k → 10%CARING CHILDREN CLOTHING CHILDREN: $19k → 10%CARING CHILDREN CLOTHING CHILDREN: $15k → 10%PLACE OF HOPE INC: $110k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE INC: $89k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE INC: $75k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $75k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $70k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $70k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $19k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $13k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 9 repeat orgs$319k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +59% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$1.6M
$319k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+59%

Still filing today

89%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $289k · revenue +42%
  • PO
    PLACE OF HOPE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $274k · revenue +102%
  • SC
    SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $259k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • TG
    The Green Turtle Cay Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue -95%
  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue +59%
  • BH
    BOCA HELPING HANDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cape Coral for the Children Inc
Youth Development
2
Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children

Provides college scholarships and mentoring programs for deserving low-income children whose household income falls below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines from middle school through college.

Crime & Legal
3
Celebrities Fore Kids Inc

The organization's mission is to make a difference in the lives of children affected by cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. we strive to improve the quality of life and well-being for them and their families by offering financial…

Human Services
4
North Florida Child Development Inc

To provide early childhood development and education.

Education
5
Children's Forum Inc

Provides leadership and advocacy to achieve high-quality, affordable and available early care and education services for all children.

Human Services
6
Bridges of Light Foundation Inc

The organization was founded in 2004 to help abused, abandoned or neglected children in need, specifically children confined to foster care facilities between the ages of 6-18 in central florida. the organization provides mentors to assist…

Education
7
Central Florida Childrens Home

To provide homes for disadvantaged children.

Human Services
8
Childrens Comprehensive Care Center Inc

To provide quality medical, educational, and therapeutic services for children with special needs, primarily from the south florida area.

Health
9
Pathways Early Education Center of Immokalee Inc

Pathways Early Education Center of Immokalee closes the opportunity gap by providing individualized, high-quality cognitive, social, emotional and physical education to children from birth to 5 years.

—
10
Cape Coral Kiwanis Foundation

The cape coral kiwanis foundation is an organization dedicated to improving the world one child and one community at a time.

Philanthropy
11
Children's Dream Fund Inc

The sole mission of the children's dream fund inc. is to make dreams come true for children with life threatening illnesses living in west central florida, and to provide lasting memories for the children and families.

—
12
The Florida Charter Educational Foundation Inc

The foundation provides high quality schools with an unwavering dedication to student achievement unyielding commitment to ethical and sound business practices providing a choice for communities, parents, students and professionals that…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Golf Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Big Heart Brigade Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $259,497 · OtherSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINCThe Unicorn Childrens Foundation: $158,846 · OtherThe Unicorn Childrens Foundation4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $108,891 · Other4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INCGEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $86,197 · OtherGEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCCHILDREN'S GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $82,900 · OtherCHILDREN'S GOLF FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $20,000 · OtherPLACE OF HOPE INC: $273,958 · Human ServicesPLACE OF HOPE INCFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $257,414 · Human ServicesFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT C…CARING CHILDREN CLOTHING CHILDREN INC: $53,657 · Human ServicesCARING CHILDREN CLOTHING CHILDREN I…SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $288,868 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS …The Green Turtle Cay Foundation: $200,000 · InternationalThe Green T…MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $31,087 · PhilanthropyBig Heart Brigade Inc: $13,000 · PhilanthropyBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionEDA AND CLIFF VINER COMMUNITY SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationMILAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$716,331Human Services$585,029Recreation & Sports$288,868International$200,000Philanthropy$44,087Food & Nutrition$25,000Education$25,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $288,868 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC: $273,958 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $259,497 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $257,414 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetThe Green Turtle Cay Foundation: $200,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetThe Unicorn Childrens Foundation: $158,846 over 6y, 18% of budgetGEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $86,197 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $82,900 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCARING CHILDREN CLOTHING CHILDREN INC: $53,657 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $31,087 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEDA AND CLIFF VINER COMMUNITY SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetBig Heart Brigade Inc: $13,000 over 1y, 95% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Palm Be…Community Foundation …Boca West Children's …The Jim Moran Foundat…The Batchelor Foundat…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way of Palm Beach County IncFL17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Boca West Children's Foundation Fka Boca West Community Charitable Foundation · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seminole Region Charity Golf Tournament Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seminole Region Charity Golf Tournament Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Children's Golf Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Seminole Region Charity Golf Tournament Inc?

Find your warmest path to Seminole Region Charity Golf Tournament Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seminole Region Charity Golf Tournament’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home