· Public charity
Seminole Region Charity Golf Tournament Inc
To organize events and fundraisers to benefit various charities selected by the board.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $99,357 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $141,357 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $42,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE FIRST TEE | $16,400 |
| CARING CHILDREN CLOTHING CHILDREN | $14,557 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS | $11,400 |
| FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC | $11,400 |
| SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE | $11,400 |
| 4KIDS OF SOUTH FL | $11,400 |
| THE UNICORN CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC | $11,400 |
| GEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $11,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $585k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +59% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc6× · 2017–2024 · $289k · revenue +42%
- POPLACE OF HOPE INC3× · 2017–2019 · $274k · revenue +102%
- SCSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC6× · 2017–2024 · $259k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- TGThe Green Turtle Cay Foundationone grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue -95%
- MTMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue +59%
- BHBOCA HELPING HANDS INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +90%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides college scholarships and mentoring programs for deserving low-income children whose household income falls below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines from middle school through college.
The organization's mission is to make a difference in the lives of children affected by cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. we strive to improve the quality of life and well-being for them and their families by offering financial…
To provide early childhood development and education.
Provides leadership and advocacy to achieve high-quality, affordable and available early care and education services for all children.
The organization was founded in 2004 to help abused, abandoned or neglected children in need, specifically children confined to foster care facilities between the ages of 6-18 in central florida. the organization provides mentors to assist…
To provide homes for disadvantaged children.
To provide quality medical, educational, and therapeutic services for children with special needs, primarily from the south florida area.
Pathways Early Education Center of Immokalee closes the opportunity gap by providing individualized, high-quality cognitive, social, emotional and physical education to children from birth to 5 years.
The cape coral kiwanis foundation is an organization dedicated to improving the world one child and one community at a time.
The sole mission of the children's dream fund inc. is to make dreams come true for children with life threatening illnesses living in west central florida, and to provide lasting memories for the children and families.
The foundation provides high quality schools with an unwavering dedication to student achievement unyielding commitment to ethical and sound business practices providing a choice for communities, parents, students and professionals that…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Golf Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Big Heart Brigade Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
- Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds The Green Turtle Cay Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Unicorn Childrens Foundation ↗
- Who funds GEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CARING CHILDREN CLOTHING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds EDA AND CLIFF VINER COMMUNITY SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Big Heart Brigade Inc ↗
- Who funds MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Boca West Children's Foundation Fka Boca West Community Charitable Foundation · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Seminole Region Charity Golf Tournament Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Children's Golf Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Seminole Region Charity Golf Tournament Inc?
Find your warmest path to Seminole Region Charity Golf Tournament Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.