Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Seeds of Faith Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$670k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

88% of Seeds of Faith Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Seeds of Faith Inc named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $670k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
18
9
19
9
20
11
21
11
22
8
23
8
24
8
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Philanthropy$5.9MReligion$1.6MEducation$1.0MHuman Services$585kHealth$520kArts & Culture$103kInternational$90kCrime & Legal$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $570k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY$200,000
PULSE OUTREACH$150,000
DIGNITY FOR THE AMPUTEE INTERNATIONAL$60,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$60,000
COMPASSCARE$50,000
HEARTLOVE PLACE$50,000
MACC FUND$40,000
TELLING THE TRUTH$30,000
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
ECHO INC$10,000
SHELL POINT LEGACY FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEARTLOVE PLACE: $30k → 17%HEARTLOVE PLACE: $50k → 17%HEARTLOVE PLACE: $50k → 17%HEARTLOVE PLACE: $40k → 17%HEARTLOVE PLACE: $40k → 17%HEARTLOVE PLACE: $35k → 17%HEARTLOVE PLACE: $35k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 25% of Seeds of Faith Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Seeds of Faith Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.9M · 17 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down. Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$3.9M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+10%

Still filing today

59%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PULSE OUTREACH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $750k · revenue +123%
  • ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $500k · revenue +39%
  • MU
    Marquette University
    8× · 2018–2025 · $435k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SF
    ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI PARISH
    one grant, 2019 · $35k
  • CE
    CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +10%
  • PF
    PARTNERS FOR SCHOOLS THAT CAN
    one grant, 2019 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
4
Zimzam Global

Equip and develop leaders and church planters (includes evangelism, discipleship, leadership development and church planting). empower children and, through them, next generation churches. engage communities through the church as a…

Religion
5
Atlanta Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

To share the truth and compassion of jesus christ, support life-affirming choices and promote healthy relationships by serving and caring for women and families in pregnancy-related circumstances

6
Peacemaker Ministries

To equip and assist christians and their churches to respond to conflict biblically.

International
7
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
8
Faith Aid

The organization cares for the sick and suffering in Jesus name by partnering with Christian mission hospitals, helping patients unable to afford treatment, and supporting Mustard Seed House ministry locations in Kenya.

International
9
Probe Ministries International

To present the gospel by providing life-long opportunities to integrate faith and learning through balanced, biblically based scholarship, training people to love god by renewing their minds and equipping the church to engage the world for…

Religion
10
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
11
Pregnancy Resources

Provide life affirming biblically based resources to encourage informed decisions regarding pregnancy and sexual abstinence.

Health
12
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pulse Outreach and the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $5,928,540 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCCOVENANT CHURCH OF NAPLES — $365,000 · OtherCOVENANT CHURC…COMPASSCARE — $280,000 · OtherCOMPASSCAREIndividual grant recipient — $175,000 · OtherIndividual gra…SHELL POINT LEGACY FOUNDATION — $102,500 · OtherSHELL POINT LE…MACC FUND — $80,000 · OtherMACC FUNDLIFE IN CHRIST MEDIA INC — $55,000 · OtherMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY BLUE & GOLD FUND — $45,000 · OtherECHO Inc — $80,000 · OtherECHO Inc+6 more — $120,000 · Other+6 morePULSE OUTREACH — $750,000 · ReligionPULSE OUTREA…TELLING THE TRUTH INC — $315,000 · ReligionTELLING THE …WISCONSIN INMATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC — $45,000 · ReligionST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC — $500,000 · EducationST AUGUSTI…Marquette University — $435,000 · EducationMarquette …+1 more — $10,000 · EducationHEARTLOVE PLACE INC — $280,000 · Human ServicesLIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC — $115,000 · Human ServicesDIGNITY FOR THE AMPUTEE INTERNATIONAL — $195,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $5,000 · HealthPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $120,000 · Civil Rights
Philanthropy$5,928,540Other$1,302,500Religion$1,110,000Education$945,000Human Services$395,000Health$210,000Civil Rights$120,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $5,928,540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPULSE OUTREACH — $750,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC — $500,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMarquette University — $435,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTELLING THE TRUTH INC — $315,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetHEARTLOVE PLACE INC — $280,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetDIGNITY FOR THE AMPUTEE INTERNATIONAL — $195,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $120,000 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetLIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC — $115,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetECHO Inc — $80,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetWISCONSIN INMATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC — $45,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOLS THAT CAN MILWAUKEE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPATIENT ADVOCATE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealthwell Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds PULSE OUTREACH
  • Who funds ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds Marquette University
  • Who funds TELLING THE TRUTH INC
  • Who funds HEARTLOVE PLACE INC
  • Who funds DIGNITY FOR THE AMPUTEE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC
  • Who funds LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC
  • Who funds ECHO Inc
  • Who funds WISCONSIN INMATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC
  • Who funds SCHOOLS THAT CAN MILWAUKEE INC
  • Who funds PATIENT ADVOCATE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND
  • Who funds Healthwell Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Poole Family Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Poole Family Foundation Inc · Husco Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Seeds of Faith Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph