Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seebe Frances Tuw

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2026still arriving
14
Grants FY2026still arriving
11
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2026.

Animals$614kHealth$355kEnvironment$117kPhilanthropy$37kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2026 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k10 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
$7,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USC NORRIS CANCER CENTER$27,000
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC$27,000
THE DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND INTERNATION$16,250
WILDLIFE GUARDIANS$15,000
AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY$7,000
SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC$7,000
WOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL$7,000
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION$7,000
BORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK$7,000
POODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INC$7,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTERN MONTANA$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT$4,000
FENCES FOR FIDO$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–26, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TIDES CENTER: $20k → 10%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $10k → 12%TIDES CENTER: $13k → 10%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $8k → 12%TIDES CENTER: $4k → 10%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $5k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $5k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $5k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $5k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $4k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
OR
PA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
NM
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 20 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+45%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
AnimalsHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DF
    Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc
    8× · 2019–2026 · $86k · revenue +98%
  • AB
    American Bird Conservancy
    8× · 2019–2026 · $77k · revenue +26%
  • BR
    BORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK
    7× · 2020–2026 · $67k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • NA
    NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -20%
  • OS
    OASIS SANCTUARY FOUNDATION LTDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +123%
  • TT
    THE TRACKING PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wildlife Protection Solutions

To protect endangered species.

Animals
2
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
3
Wildlife Sos

Protecting india's precious wildlife from poaching, habitat loss, and human exploitation since 1995.

Animals
4
Asia Wild

Asia Wild is committed to rescuing and protecting the welfare of animals worldwide. They support small, locally-focused organizations that tirelessly combat numerous issues that threaten wildlife survival, including poaching, abuse,…

Animals
5
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
6
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
7
Animal Nation Inc

Animal welfare organization providing rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption for wild, domestic, and farmed animals.

Animals
8
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
9
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
10
Alaska Wildlife Alliance

Support ecosystem-based wildlife management by increasing public awareness of wildlife issues, responding to information requests, advocating for science-based wildlife habitat management through proposal and comment submissions, and…

Environment
11
Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation Inc

Dedicated to the rescue, rehabilitation, and release of orphaned, injured and displaced wildlife. wildlife rescue rescues and cares for all wildlife, including native and nonnative species believing all animals are deserving of care,…

Animals
12
City Wildlife Inc

The goals of City Wildlife are to rescue sick, orphaned, and injured wild animals and return them to the wild; to promote the enjoyment of and harmonious co-existence with native wildlife; and to protect the District of Columbias wild…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Working Dogs for Conservation Found; the most unlike its peers is Abby's Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USC NORRIS CANCER CENTER: $177,597 · OtherUSC NORRIS CANCER CENTERDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $86,250 · OtherDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International IncARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $73,950 · OtherARTHRITIS FOUNDATIONTHE INTERNATIONAL WILDLIFE COEXISTENCE: $32,500 · OtherTHE INTERNATIONAL WILDLIFE COEXISTENCEENV EDUCATION AND GLOBAL CONS GLOBAL IN: $32,500 · OtherENV EDUCATION AND GLOBAL CONS GLOBAL INABBY'S ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $22,500 · Other+4 more: $35,500 · Other+4 moreWILDLIFE GUARDIANS: $138,500 · AnimalsWILDLIFE GUARDIANSAmerican Bird Conservancy: $77,000 · AnimalsAmerican Bird ConservancyPOODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INC: $61,000 · AnimalsPOODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INCWOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $57,000 · AnimalsWOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONALSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $37,000 · AnimalsSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INCHUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTERN MONTANA: $29,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTERN MONTANA+5 more: $26,500 · Animals+5 moreARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $103,772 · HealthARTHRITIS …+1 more: $3,000 · HealthBORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK: $67,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION & CONSERVATION GLOBAL INC: $17,000 · EnvironmentAnimal Friends Rescue Project: $43,500 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $37,000 · Human Services
Other$460,797Animals$426,000Health$106,772Environment$84,000Human Services$80,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILDLIFE GUARDIANS: $138,500 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $103,772 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $86,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $77,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK: $67,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetPOODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INC: $61,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetWOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $57,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAnimal Friends Rescue Project: $43,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $37,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $37,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTERN MONTANA: $29,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION & CONSERVATION GLOBAL INC: $17,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetFENCES FOR FIDO: $11,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOASIS SANCTUARY FOUNDATION LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TRACKING PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetWorking Dogs For Conservation Found: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY LAKE COUNTY AREA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILDLIFE GUARDIANS ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds BORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds POODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Animal Friends Rescue Project ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTERN MONTANA ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION & CONSERVATION GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FENCES FOR FIDO ↗
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OASIS SANCTUARY FOUNDATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE TRACKING PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Working Dogs For Conservation Found ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY LAKE COUNTY AREA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Woodtiger FundPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Woodtiger Fund · Seadream Family Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seebe Frances Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seebe Frances Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Seebe Frances Tuw?

    Find your warmest path to Seebe Frances Tuw through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seebe Frances Tuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph