· Private foundation
Seebe Frances Tuw
Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2026
- Under $10k10 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USC NORRIS CANCER CENTER | $27,000 |
| ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC | $27,000 |
| THE DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND INTERNATION | $16,250 |
| WILDLIFE GUARDIANS | $15,000 |
| SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC | $7,000 |
| BORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK | $7,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION | $7,000 |
| AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY | $7,000 |
| WOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL | $7,000 |
| POODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INC | $7,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT | $4,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTERN MONTANA | $4,000 |
| FENCES FOR FIDO | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–26, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DFDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc8× · 2019–2026 · $86k · revenue +98%
- ABAmerican Bird Conservancy8× · 2019–2026 · $77k · revenue +26%
- BRBORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK7× · 2020–2026 · $67k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- OSOASIS SANCTUARY FOUNDATION LTDgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +123%
- NANORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -20%
- TTTHE TRACKING PROJECT INCone grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To protect endangered species.
A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.
Protecting india's precious wildlife from poaching, habitat loss, and human exploitation since 1995.
Asia Wild is committed to rescuing and protecting the welfare of animals worldwide. They support small, locally-focused organizations that tirelessly combat numerous issues that threaten wildlife survival, including poaching, abuse,…
Animal welfare organization providing rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption for wild, domestic, and farmed animals.
Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.
To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…
Support ecosystem-based wildlife management by increasing public awareness of wildlife issues, responding to information requests, advocating for science-based wildlife habitat management through proposal and comment submissions, and…
Dedicated to the rescue, rehabilitation, and release of orphaned, injured and displaced wildlife. wildlife rescue rescues and cares for all wildlife, including native and nonnative species believing all animals are deserving of care,…
The goals of City Wildlife are to rescue sick, orphaned, and injured wild animals and return them to the wild; to promote the enjoyment of and harmonious co-existence with native wildlife; and to protect the District of Columbias wild…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Working Dogs for Conservation Found and the most unlike its peers is Abby's Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WILDLIFE GUARDIANS ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
- Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
- Who funds BORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds POODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds WOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Animal Friends Rescue Project ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTERN MONTANA ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION & CONSERVATION GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds FENCES FOR FIDO ↗
- Who funds OASIS SANCTUARY FOUNDATION LTD ↗
- Who funds NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRACKING PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Working Dogs For Conservation Found ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY LAKE COUNTY AREA INC ↗
- Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Woodtiger Fund · Seadream Family Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Seebe Frances Tuw funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Seebe Frances Tuw?
Find your warmest path to Seebe Frances Tuw through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.