Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Second Core Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$276k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
33%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 17
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$2.1M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 33% of the organizations Second Core Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 2% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationSocial ScienceYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$276k73%
FY20236$123k33%
FY20223$108k33%
FY202113$228k38%
FY202017$222k76%
FY201916$161k75%
FY201817$157k53%
FY201713$122kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.0MHealth$111kReligion$80kHuman Services$51kSocial Science$48kYouth Development$46kInternational$20kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
OR
NV
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
NM
DC
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
William Jessup University$379,20070%
Prager University Foundation$350,00040%
The Harbor Church$50,0003n/a
Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists$50,00014%
Alternatives Pregnancy Center$50,00013%
The Morning Star Foundation$48,00030%
Campus Life Connection$31,00051%
Sierra College Foundation$28,50031%
Everyone Matters Ministries$28,150110%
Powerhouse Ministries Inc$25,0001n/a
Show all 27 grantees
All grantees of Second Core Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
William Jessup University$379,20070%
Prager University Foundation$350,00040%
The Harbor Church$50,0003n/a
Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists$50,00014%
Alternatives Pregnancy Center$50,00013%
The Morning Star Foundation$48,00030%
Campus Life Connection$31,00051%
Sierra College Foundation$28,50031%
Everyone Matters Ministries$28,150110%
Powerhouse Ministries Inc$25,0001n/a
Biola University Inc$23,00030%
Passionlife Ministries Inc$20,0001n/a
FresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc$10,15020%
Hart of Folsom$10,000110%
Twin Lakes Food Bank$8,00010%
Orangevale Community Foundation$8,00010%
University of California Santa Barbara$6,0002n/a
Youth for Christ Sacramento$5,00010%
University of Redlands$5,00010%
California Baptist University$5,00010%
World Wildlife Fund Inc$5,00010%
Brigham Young University$3,0001n/a
National University$3,00010%
Alexs Lemonade Stand Foundation$2,00010%
Donorschooseorg$1,17410%
Colorado State University$1,0001n/a
Rob Maxey Education Fund$1,0001n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 36 recipients with no EIN on record ($239k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Second Core Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWilliam Jessup University: $379,200 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPrager University Foundation: $350,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAssociation of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists: $50,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetAlternatives Pregnancy Center: $50,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetThe Morning Star Foundation: $48,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCampus Life Connection: $31,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSierra College Foundation: $28,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEveryone Matters Ministries: $28,150 over 1y, 10% of budgetBiola University Inc: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc: $10,150 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHart of Folsom: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTwin Lakes Food Bank: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOrangevale Community Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYouth for Christ Sacramento: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Redlands: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Baptist University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Wildlife Fund Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational University: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlexs Lemonade Stand Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDonorschooseorg: $1,174 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Biddle Family Foundation IncCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Biddle Family Foundation Inc · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Servant Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Second Core Foundation with peer funders

About Second Core Foundation

How much does Second Core Foundation give?
Second Core Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $275,850 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 17 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Second Core Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (72%), Health (8%), Religion (6%).
Who are Second Core Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: William Jessup University ($379k), Prager University Foundation ($350k), The Harbor Church ($50k).
Does Second Core Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Second Core Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Second Core Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Biddle Family Foundation Inc, Sacramento Region Community Foundation, Servant Foundation.
Where is Second Core Foundation based?
Second Core Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Second Core’s filings →

More from the funding graph