Skip to content

· Private foundation

Searles Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$256kAnimals$85kEducation$47kHealth$35kEnvironment$26kYouth Development$26kPhilanthropy$20kInternational$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $34k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$986k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLARK LAKE SPIRITS FOUNDATION$60,000
FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS & SCULPTURE FOUNDATION$14,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM$10,000
LAKE WINNIPESAUKEE ASSOCIATION$10,000
HYDE SCHOOLS$5,000
LOON PRESERVATION COMMITTEE$5,000
ABACO STRONG$4,000
BARN SANCTUARY$2,000
THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC$2,000
TOLEDO SYMPHONY$1,000
TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART$1,000
LIBRARY LEGACY FOUNDATION$1,000
TOLEDO ZOO$1,000
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $2k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $1k → 16%TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN NASSAU COUNTY: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$478k · 20 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
14

Total granted

$478k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+5%

Still filing today

70%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CLARK LAKE SPIRIT FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $91k · revenue +473% · 31% of their budget
  • LP
    Loon Preservation Committee
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +1%
  • LW
    Lake Winnipesaukee Association
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +254%

Funded once

  • CT
    CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC PARISH
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • SR
    ST ROBERT OF NEWMINSTER PARISH
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • FF
    Friends For Tomorrow Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
2
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
3
Leelanau Conservancy

To conserve the land, water and scenic character of leelanau county, and to provide educational programs to develop an understanding and appreciation of leelanau county's natural heritage.

Environment
4
Wilton Land Conservation Trust

Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.

Environment
5
Zoological Society of Buffalo Inc

Building community; creating connections; saving wildlife through a collaboration for change: the buffalo zoo will be a center of conservation excellence, providing leadership to secure a future where wildlife thrives. we embody our…

Animals
6
Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment
7
Lowell Observatory Foundation

To sustain and enhance lowell observatory's mission of research and education by generating perpetual financial support.

Science & Tech
8
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
9
Cincinnati Zoo Foundation Inc

Perform fundraising functions, provide financial support, carryout the purpose and otherwise operating for the benefit of the zoological society of cincinnati.

Animals
10
Akron Zoological Park

We connect your life to wildlife while inspiring lifelong learning and conservation action.

Animals
11
Longneck Manor Conservation Foundation

To create memorable guest experiences which promote actions to help save species, habitats, and the communities who share those same landscapes

Animals
12
Turtle Conservancy

The turtle conservancy is dedicated to protecting threatened turtles and tortoises and their habitats worldwide, and to promoting their appreciation by people.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Toledo and the Toledo Newsboys Association; the most unlike its peers is Abaco Strong Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM: $118,600 · Arts & CultureNEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUMCLARK LAKE SPIRIT FOUNDATION INC: $91,000 · Arts & CultureCLARK LAKE SPIRIT FOUNDATION INCTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $9,000 · Arts & CultureBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATIONLake Winnipesaukee Association: $25,000 · OtherLake Winnipesaukee AssociationSOUTH CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUND…DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $9,000 · OtherDARTMOUTH COLLEGETOLEDO SYMPHONY: $9,000 · OtherTOLEDO SYMPHONYCHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC PARISH: $7,500 · OtherST ROBERT OF NEWMINSTER PARISH: $7,500 · OtherLIBRARY LEGACY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherHyde School: $7,500 · OtherRotary Club of Fernandina Beach Charitable Fund Inc: $6,000 · OtherFriends For Tomorrow Inc: $5,000 · Other+12 more: $22,850 · Other+12 moreLoon Preservation Committee: $45,000 · EnvironmentLoon Preservat…FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS & SCULPTURE FOUNDATION: $24,000 · EnvironmentFREDERIK MEIJE…BARN SANCTUARY: $14,500 · AnimalsJACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $14,000 · AnimalsTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $9,000 · Animals+1 more: $1,250 · AnimalsBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NASSAU COUNTY FOUNDATION: $23,500 · Youth DevelopmentJackson Community Foundation: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyAbaco Strong Inc: $19,000 · International
Arts & Culture$218,600Other$147,350Environment$69,000Animals$38,750Youth Development$23,500Philanthropy$20,000International$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM: $118,600 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetCLARK LAKE SPIRIT FOUNDATION INC: $91,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetLoon Preservation Committee: $45,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetLake Winnipesaukee Association: $25,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetFREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS & SCULPTURE FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NASSAU COUNTY FOUNDATION: $23,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAbaco Strong Inc: $19,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetJackson Community Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBARN SANCTUARY: $14,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHyde School: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRotary Club of Fernandina Beach Charitable Fund Inc: $6,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetFriends For Tomorrow Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TOLEDO AND THE TOLEDO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN IN NASSAU COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetABACO-WINDING BAY RELIEF FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CLARK LAKE SPIRIT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Loon Preservation Committee ↗
  • Who funds Lake Winnipesaukee Association ↗
  • Who funds FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS & SCULPTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NASSAU COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Abaco Strong Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jackson Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BARN SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds JACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Hyde School ↗
  • Who funds Rotary Club of Fernandina Beach Charitable Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friends For Tomorrow Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TOLEDO AND THE TOLEDO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Barnabas Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN IN NASSAU COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ABACO-WINDING BAY RELIEF FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Isaac FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Isaac Foundation · The O-I Charities Foundation · Toledo Community Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Searles Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Searles Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Searles Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Searles Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Searles Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph