Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sealark Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$13MScience & Tech$2.5MArts & Culture$2.5MHuman Services$2.5MPhilanthropy$2.2MCommunity Improvement$2.1MEmployment$1.3MFood & Nutrition$330kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $300k
  • $250k+6 grants · $5.2M
$75,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$100M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARD COLLEGE AT SIMON'S ROCK$2,100,000
COMMIT OPPORTUNITY 2040 FUND 1$1,000,000
HISTORIC HIGHFIELD INC$600,000
WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE$550,000
FOR OAK CLIFF$500,000
COMMIT PARTNERSHIP$400,000
CHILD CARE GROUP$100,000
SCHOLARSHOT$75,000
BACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER FUND$75,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$50,000
DALLAS FOUNDATION$25,000
OUTWARD BOUND INC$25,000
CAPE COD HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$25,000
DALLAS CASA$25,000
PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $500k → 17%FOR OAK CLIFF: $580k → 14%FOR OAK CLIFF: $500k → 14%FOR OAK CLIFF: $150k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $15k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $15k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $15k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $15k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $10k → 14%BACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER FUND: $75k → 14%BACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER: $50k → 14%BACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 24 repeat orgs$5.0M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
14

Total granted

$23M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+193%

Still filing today

71%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureScience & TechFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BARD COLLEGE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $12M · revenue +151%
  • WH
    WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +35%
  • C
    CHILDCAREGROUP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $600k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TX
    one grant, 2020 · $1.9M
  • HC
    HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -43%
  • CC
    CAPE COD COMMUNITY COLLEGE ED FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
4
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
5
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
6
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
7
Bullis School

Bullis school provides a student-centered balanced experience in academics, arts, athletics and community service. bullis uniquely prepares all students to become caring citizens and creative, critical thinkers who will thrive in…

Education
8
Communities in Schools of Central Texas

Communities in schools of central texas (cisct) ensures students have holistic support, removing academic and nonacademic barriers to their success in school.

Education
9
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
12
Dallas Christian School

Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Foundation of Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bard College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BARD COLLEGE: $11,580,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGEDALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $775,000 · EducationDALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATIONALCUIN SCHOOL: $524,854 · Education+1 more: $200,000 · EducationTHE COMMIT PARTNERSHIP: $2,100,000 · OtherTHE COMMIT PARTNERSHIPCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TX: $1,900,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TXHISTORIC HIGHFIELD INC-HIGHFIELD HALL & GARDENS: $1,200,000 · OtherHISTORIC HIGHFIELD INC-HIGHFIELD HAL…COMMIT OPPORTUNITY 2040 FUND 1: $1,000,000 · OtherCOMMIT OPPORTUNITY 2040 FUND 1CHILDCAREGROUP: $600,000 · OtherCHILDCAREGROUPHIGHFIELD HALL & GARDENS: $525,000 · OtherHIGHFIELD HALL & GARDENSSCHOLARSHOT: $375,000 · Other+19 more: $1,622,500 · Other+19 moreWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $2,550,000 · Science & TechWOODS HOLE…FOR OAK CLIFF: $1,230,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $500,000 · Human ServicesBACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER: $175,000 · Human ServicesThe Family Place: $70,000 · Human ServicesTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $781,250 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $250,000 · PhilanthropyHISTORIC HIGHFIELD INC: $600,000 · Arts & CulturePEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE: $115,000 · Arts & CultureLOCKWOOD-MATHEWS MANSION MUSEUM OF NORWALK INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS CASA: $100,000 · Civil RightsMINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC: $30,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$13,079,854Other$9,322,500Science & Tech$2,550,000Human Services$1,975,000Philanthropy$1,031,250Arts & Culture$765,000Civil Rights$100,000Food & Nutrition$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARD COLLEGE: $11,580,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $2,550,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFOR OAK CLIFF: $1,230,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $781,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $775,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetCHILDCAREGROUP: $600,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHISTORIC HIGHFIELD INC: $600,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetALCUIN SCHOOL: $524,854 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSCHOLARSHOT: $375,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $270,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMIT2DALLAS: $200,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER: $175,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetPEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE: $115,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS CASA: $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetThe Family Place: $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOCKWOOD-MATHEWS MANSION MUSEUM OF NORWALK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBROTHER BILLS HELPING HAND: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds FOR OAK CLIFF ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDCAREGROUP ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC HIGHFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds ALCUIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLARSHOT ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMIT2DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds BACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CASA ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LOCKWOOD-MATHEWS MANSION MUSEUM OF NORWALK INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds BROTHER BILLS HELPING HAND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX21.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Byrne Family Foundation Trust · Texas Women's Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Hersh Foundation · The Addy Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Harry Bass Foundation · Child Poverty Action Lab · George & Fay Young Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sealark Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sealark Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 43%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • Lockwood-Mathews Mansion Museum of Norwalk Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Historic Highfield Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sealark Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx?

Find your warmest path to Sealark Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sealark Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

More from the funding graph