Skip to content
Seabrook Community Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Seabrook Community Foundation

The SEABROOK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION's mission is to provide scholarship assistance for struggling/underprivileged youth and unmet or critical supportive services for the community to the remote, rural, tribal, and coastal areas within the surrounding grays harbor county community.

$408k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$274kEducation$169kRecreation & Sports$100kYouth Development$85kHuman Services$70kArts & Culture$54kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kReligion$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $202,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $408,487 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $206,387 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAVE FOUNDATION$100,000
GOOD NEIGHBORS SENIOR CENTER ASSOCIATION$42,500
NORTH BEACH HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
QUINAULT INDIAN NATION$11,000
YMCA OF GRAYS HARBOR$8,000
WASHINGTON STATE SOCIETY OF THE SONS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION$5,600
BANK TO SCHOOL MARKETPLACE$5,000
BEYOND SURVIVAL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHAPLAINS ON THE HARBOR: $12k → 18%CHAPLAINS ON THE HARBOR: $6k → 18%COASTAL HARVEST: $20k → 18%COASTAL HARVEST: $17k → 18%COASTAL HARVEST: $15k → 18%YMCA OF GRAYS HARBOR: $8k → 18%COASTAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $10k → 18%COASTAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $10k → 18%BEYOND SURVIVAL: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$428k · 10 repeat orgs$417k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
24

Total granted

$428k
$257k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+39%

Still filing today

80%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthEmploymentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GN
    GOOD NEIGHBORS SENIOR CENTER ASSOC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $156k · revenue +227%
  • CH
    COASTAL HARVEST
    4× · 2017–2020 · $52k · revenue +39%
  • CC
    COASTAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM
    2× · 2018–2023 · $20k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • PB
    PACIFIC BEACH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT GROUP
    one grant, 2023 · $47k
  • GH
    GRAYS HABOR EMS COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +81%
  • MF
    MAAP Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · 38% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences

Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences educates and trains health care professionals emphasizing service among rural and medically under-served communities throughout the Northwest.

Education
2
Center for Wooden Boats

The Center for Wooden Boats promotes Northwest Maritime Heritage through education, interpretation and hands-on experience in building, maintaining and using historic small craft.

Recreation & Sports
3
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
4
Mid Puget Sound Fisheries Enhancement Gr

Engaging people in on-the-ground efforts to help salmon and our communities thrive.

Animals
5
Gig Harbor Chamber of Commerce

Serve the small business community and local development.

—
6
Washington Wildlife & Recreation Coalition

Creating a greener, healthier, more equitable, and better Washington for all through community outreach, network building, and advocacy for conservation and outdoor recreation funding.

—
7
Washington Filmworks

To build and enhance the competitiveness of Washington State's film and associated creative industry. We accomplish this by marketing and managing the state's production incentive program, representing the state in national and…

Community Improvement
8
Central Washington Health Services Association

Local care by and for our community.

Health
9
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
10
Pacific Shellfish Institute

Fostering sustainable shellfish resources and a healthy marine environment through research and education.

Science & Tech
11
Peninsula Community Health Services of Alaska

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health
12
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections a Center for Healthy Families; the most unlike its peers is Good Neighbors Senior Center Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOOD NEIGHBORS SENIOR CENTER ASSOC: $156,411 · OtherGOOD NEIGHBORS SENIOR CENTER ASSOCPACIFIC BEACH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT GROUP: $46,600 · OtherPACIFIC BEACH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT GROUPNORTH BEACH HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherNORTH BEACH HIGH SCHOOLREVIVAL OF GRAYS HARBOR: $20,750 · OtherGRAYS HARBOR CERT: $18,000 · OtherCONNECTIONS A CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES: $22,000 · OtherMAAP Foundation: $14,700 · Other+16 more: $125,648 · Other+16 moreCOASTAL HARVEST: $52,000 · Human ServicesCOASTAL HARVE…COASTAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOASTAL COMMU…CHAPLAINS ON THE HARBOR: $18,000 · Human ServicesCHAPLAINS ON …Young Men's Christian Association of Grays Harbor: $8,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's C…BEYOND SURVIVAL: $5,000 · Human ServicesRave Foundation: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsRave Foundati…GRAYS HARBOR COLLEGE FEDERATION OF TEACHERS: $65,000 · EmploymentGRAYS HARBO…GRAYS HARBOR YOUTH WORKS: $18,000 · EmploymentGRAYS HARBO…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $14,000 · EducationCOASTAL INTERPRETIVE CENTER: $10,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI: $9,000 · EducationEastern Washington University Foundation: $7,000 · EducationSAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationGREEN LANTERN LUNCH PROGRAM: $37,500 · Food & NutritionOcean Shores Food Bank: $10,000 · Food & NutritionGRAYS HABOR EMS COUNCIL INC: $20,000 · HealthNORTH BEACH MEDICAL EQUIPMENT: $10,000 · Health
Other$429,109Human Services$103,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Employment$83,000Education$52,000Food & Nutrition$47,500Health$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD NEIGHBORS SENIOR CENTER ASSOC: $156,411 over 5y, 24% of budgetRave Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCOASTAL HARVEST: $52,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGREEN LANTERN LUNCH PROGRAM: $37,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetCONNECTIONS A CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES: $22,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGRAYS HABOR EMS COUNCIL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCOASTAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAAP Foundation: $14,700 over 1y, 38% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOcean Shores Food Bank: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetGRAYS HARBOR HISTORICAL SEAPORT AUTHORITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOASTAL INTERPRETIVE CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetNORTH BEACH MEDICAL EQUIPMENT: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetMoclips by the Sea Historical Society: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Grays Harbor: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BRIDGE MUSIC PROJECT: $7,500 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetColumbia Wellness: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEastern Washington University Foundation: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND SURVIVAL: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grays Harbor Communit…Druzianich Family Cha…United Way of Grays H…Medina FoundationSeattle FoundationGoldberg Family Chari…The Community Foundat…Food LifelineArtsfundPuget Sound Energy Fo…Enterprise Holdings F…American Endowment Fo…
Grays Harbor Community FoundationWA40.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grays Harbor Community Foundation · Druzianich Family Charitable Foundation · United Way of Grays Harbor · Medina Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Goldberg Family Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound · Food Lifeline · Artsfund · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seabrook Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seabrook Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seabrook’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home