· Community foundation
Seabrook Community Foundation
The SEABROOK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION's mission is to provide scholarship assistance for struggling/underprivileged youth and unmet or critical supportive services for the community to the remote, rural, tribal, and coastal areas within the surrounding grays harbor county community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $202,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $408,487 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $206,387 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $79k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RAVE FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| GOOD NEIGHBORS SENIOR CENTER ASSOCIATION | $42,500 |
| NORTH BEACH HIGH SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| QUINAULT INDIAN NATION | $11,000 |
| YMCA OF GRAYS HARBOR | $8,000 |
| WASHINGTON STATE SOCIETY OF THE SONS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION | $5,600 |
| BANK TO SCHOOL MARKETPLACE | $5,000 |
| BEYOND SURVIVAL | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GNGOOD NEIGHBORS SENIOR CENTER ASSOC5× · 2020–2024 · $156k · revenue +227%
- CHCOASTAL HARVEST4× · 2017–2020 · $52k · revenue +39%
- CCCOASTAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM2× · 2018–2023 · $20k · revenue +180%
Funded once
- PBPACIFIC BEACH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT GROUPone grant, 2023 · $47k
- GHGRAYS HABOR EMS COUNCIL INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +81%
- MFMAAP Foundationone grant, 2017 · $15k · 38% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences educates and trains health care professionals emphasizing service among rural and medically under-served communities throughout the Northwest.
The Center for Wooden Boats promotes Northwest Maritime Heritage through education, interpretation and hands-on experience in building, maintaining and using historic small craft.
Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.
PAWS cares for lost, abandoned and abused animals and finds them new homes with responsible owners. PAWS also provides low cost spay and neuter services, a pet food pantry, and community education. During 2024 PAWS adopted out 577 pets.…
Engaging people in on-the-ground efforts to help salmon and our communities thrive.
Serve the small business community and local development.
Creating a greener, healthier, more equitable, and better Washington for all through community outreach, network building, and advocacy for conservation and outdoor recreation funding.
Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.
To build and enhance the competitiveness of Washington State's film and associated creative industry. We accomplish this by marketing and managing the state's production incentive program, representing the state in national and…
Local care by and for our community.
Fostering sustainable shellfish resources and a healthy marine environment through research and education.
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections a Center for Healthy Families and the most unlike its peers is Good Neighbors Senior Center Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOOD NEIGHBORS SENIOR CENTER ASSOC ↗
- Who funds Rave Foundation ↗
- Who funds GRAYS HARBOR COLLEGE FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ↗
- Who funds COASTAL HARVEST ↗
- Who funds GREEN LANTERN LUNCH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds CONNECTIONS A CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds COASTAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds GRAYS HABOR EMS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds GRAYS HARBOR YOUTH WORKS ↗
- Who funds CHAPLAINS ON THE HARBOR ↗
- Who funds MAAP Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Moclips by the Sea Historical Society ↗
- Who funds Ocean Shores Food Bank ↗
- Who funds NORTH BEACH MEDICAL EQUIPMENT ↗
- Who funds GRAYS HARBOR HISTORICAL SEAPORT AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds COASTAL INTERPRETIVE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Grays Harbor ↗
- Who funds Columbia Wellness ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE MUSIC PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SAVING THE NATIONS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Eastern Washington University Foundation ↗
- Who funds SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEYOND SURVIVAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Grays Harbor Community Foundation · Druzianich Family Charitable Foundation · United Way of Grays Harbor · Medina Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Goldberg Family Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound · Food Lifeline · Artsfund · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Seabrook Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.