Skip to content

· Private foundation

Scp Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$153k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$549kHuman Services$78kPhilanthropy$47kInternational$36kRecreation & Sports$20kFood & Nutrition$5kHousing & Shelter$4kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $92k
$6,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$657k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHERRY HILLS COMMUNITY CHURCH$91,700
OPEN HEARTS$25,000
RENEW THE HOPE$14,000
CRU$6,800
RESCUED MINISTRIES$6,500
CHRIST STREET FELLOWSHIP$4,500
DESIRING GOD$2,000
HOPE HAVEN RWANDA$1,599
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$1,000
FREE LIFE CHURCH$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RENEW THE HOPE: $14k → 14%RENEW THE HOPE: $13k → 14%RENEW THE HOPE: $10k → 14%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 12%RENEW THE HOPE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MI
OR
CA
CO
MO
VA
AR
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Scp Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 72% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 68%.

Scp Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$715k · 20 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
14

Total granted

$715k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+2%

Still filing today

35%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    5× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +120%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +134%
  • DG
    DESIRING GOD MINISTRIES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • FC
    FATHOM CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
  • DS
    DENVER SEMINARY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • FH
    FREE-MAN HOUSE
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Relearn

Relearn is a non-profit ministry that produces a podcast, books, and runs a biblical house church planting school.

Religion
2
Summit Ministries Inc

Summit ministries is an educational christian ministry with the purpose of equipping tomorrow's servant leaders to analyze competing worldviews and champion the christian faith, inspiring each one to love god with all his heart, soul,…

—
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
5
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
6
Fort Collins Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
7
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
8
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
9
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
10
Coalition for Christian Outreach

The cco (coalition for christian outreach) is an interdenominational campus ministry organization with a mission of "transforming college students to transform the world." the cco is supported primarily through donor contributions and…

—
11
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
12
New Hope International Ministries

To promote and foster christianity throughout the pacific rim, hawaii, and elsewhere.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Restoration House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHERRY HILLS COMMUNITY CHURCH: $174,557 · OtherCHERRY HILLS COMMUNITY CHURCHMISSION HILLS CHURCH: $81,000 · OtherMISSION HILLS CHURCHSACRED PLACE: $67,000 · OtherSACRED PLACEOPEN HEARTS: $55,000 · OtherOPEN HEARTSCHRIST STREET FELLOWSHIP INC: $54,500 · OtherCHRIST STREET FELLOWSHIP INCNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION: $42,000 · OtherNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATIONCRU: $34,150 · OtherCRURESCUED MINISTRIES: $26,600 · OtherREFUGE CITY MINSTRIES: $23,450 · OtherPARK CHURCH: $22,000 · Other+16 more: $42,006 · Other+16 moreRENEW THE HOPE INC: $39,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $7,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $19,000 · ReligionDESIRING GOD MINISTRIES: $15,000 · Religion+2 more: $1,400 · ReligionFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $19,500 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUST: $13,857 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $1,547 · InternationalThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $2,800 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $2,041 · PhilanthropyASIAN HOPE INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $4,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$622,263Human Services$46,000Religion$35,400Youth Development$19,500International$15,404Philanthropy$5,841Food & Nutrition$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRENEW THE HOPE INC: $39,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetREFUGE CITY MINSTRIES: $23,450 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $19,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDESIRING GOD MINISTRIES: $15,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUST: $13,857 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $2,041 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $1,547 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMENT 5280: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BLEXIT FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRevelation Retreats: $400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANTHEM CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RENEW THE HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGE CITY MINSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds DESIRING GOD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMENT 5280 ↗
  • Who funds THE BLEXIT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Revelation Retreats ↗
  • Who funds ANTHEM CLASSICAL ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO19.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Greater Horizons · Tyl Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scp Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scp Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph