Skip to content

· Private foundation

Scott Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$340k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$4.3MRecreation & Sports$1.1MCivil Rights$775kReligion$600kHealth$102kFood & Nutrition$100kAnimals$75kYouth Development$65k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$801k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Anti-Defamation League$150,000
University of Illinois$100,000
University of Notre Dame$25,000
Spotivity Gateway Foundation$25,000
Spotivity Gateway Foundation$20,000
Spotivity Gateway Foundation$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Zeus Oncology Fund: $50k → 11%HollyRod Foundation: $2k → 14%University of Notre Dame: $400k → 13%LINK Unlimited Scholars: $150k → 14%St Johns Catholic Newman Center: $200k → 19%Zeus Oncology Fund: $25k → 11%University of Notre Dame: $225k → 13%LINK Unlimited Scholars: $150k → 14%St John's Catholic Newman Center: $125k → 19%University of Notre Dame: $200k → 13%LINK Unlimited: $100k → 14%St John's Catholic Newman Center: $125k → 19%University of Notre Dame: $200k → 13%Back 2 School America: $70k → 14%University of Illinois: $100k → 19%University of Notre Dame: $25k → 13%NAMI Chicago: $25k → 14%St Johns Catholic Newman Center: $100k → 19%NAMI Chicago: $25k → 14%Unversity of Illinois Foundation: $700k → 19%Back 2 School America: $15k → 14%Unversity of Illinois Foundation: $700k → 19%National Alliance on Mental Illness Chicago: $25k → 14%University of Illinois Foundation: $500k → 19%National Alliance on Mental Illness Chicago: $25k → 14%University of Illinois Foundation: $200k → 19%Old St Patrick's Church: $50k → 14%University of Illinois Foundation: $200k → 19%St Ignatius College Prep: $250k → 14%Saint Ignatius College Prep: $250k → 14%St Ignatius College Prep: $250k → 14%Saint Ignatius College Prep: $250k → 14%St Ignatius College Prep: $250k → 14%Catholic Extension: $20k → 14%Catholic Extension: $20k → 14%Catholic Extension: $20k → 14%Spotivity Gateway Foundation: $25k → 14%Catholic Extension: $20k → 14%Spotivity Gateway Foundation: $20k → 14%Catholic Extension: $20k → 14%Spotivity Gateway Foundation: $20k → 14%Chicago Jesuit Academy: $200k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of Scott Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 72% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 68%.

Scott Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 12 repeat orgs$417k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$5.7M
$252k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
-26%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsCivil RightsAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Illinois Foundation
    4× · 2017–2022 · $2.3M · revenue +127%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    5× · 2017–2024 · $775k · revenue +78%
  • LU
    LINK Unlimited Scholars
    3× · 2020–2023 · $400k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • CJ
    CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • OS
    OLD ST PATRICKS CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • HF
    HOLLYROD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Students Run Chicago
Health
2
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
3
Chicago Rowing Foundation

To promote foster and support both sweep rowing and sculling to youth and adults in the Greater Chicago Metropolitan Area and to educate coach and train the general public in skills relating to rowing and in-water safety.

—
4
University of Illinois Alumni Association

The mission of the university of illinois alumni association is to enhance and advance the relationship between the university of illinois at urbana-champaign (the university) and all its alumni; to inspire lifelong loyalty and pride among…

—
5
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
6
Dominican University

Dominican University provides instruction to students seeking an Associates, Undergraduate or Graduate degree (some doctorate and certificates), and administers all of its programs without discrimination of race, color, gender, religion,…

Education
7
The Illinois Chapter of Alpha Delta Phi

The illinois chapter of alpha delta phi strives to enhance its brothers and enrich outward society, especially that of the university of illinois at urbana-champaign, and of the cities of champaign and urbana and county of champaign.…

Education
8
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
9
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
10
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
11
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
12
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Link Unlimited Scholars; the most unlike its peers is Zeus Oncology Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Illinois Foundation: $2,300,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois FoundationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,050,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacLINK Unlimited Scholars: $400,000 · EducationLINK Unlimited ScholarsSt Ignatius College Prep: $750,000 · OtherSt Ignatius College PrepSt Johns Catholic Newman Center: $550,000 · OtherSt Johns Catholic Newman CenterSaint Ignatius College Prep: $500,000 · OtherSaint Ignatius College PrepCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $200,000 · OtherCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMYCATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIETY OF US OF AMER: $100,000 · OtherUniversity of Illinois: $100,000 · Other+4 more: $215,000 · Other+4 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $775,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMAT…BACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA: $85,000 · Youth DevelopmentChicago Training Center: $75,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsZEUS ONCOLOGY FUND INC: $75,000 · Animals
Education$3,750,000Other$2,415,000Civil Rights$775,000Youth Development$85,000Recreation & Sports$76,500Animals$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $2,300,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,050,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $775,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLINK Unlimited Scholars: $400,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetBACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA: $85,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetChicago Training Center: $75,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetZEUS ONCOLOGY FUND INC: $75,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetNAMI Chicago: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOLLYROD FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds LINK Unlimited Scholars ↗
  • Who funds BACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Training Center ↗
  • Who funds ZEUS ONCOLOGY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI Chicago ↗
  • Who funds HOLLYROD FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scott Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scott Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Scott Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Scott Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scott Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph