Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Scott & Margy Trumbull Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$311k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$118k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$984kHealth$326kArts & Culture$297kAnimals$83kHuman Services$73kInternational$40kRecreation & Sports$24kYouth Development$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $168k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$278k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DENISON UNIVERSITY$118,000
LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY$50,000
TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART$45,000
PROMEDICA FOUNDATION YWCA CAPITAL CAMPAIGN$20,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$10,000
NORTH SHORE COUNTRY CLUB$10,000
DAYCROFT SCHOOL$10,000
AFRICAN WILDLIFE CONSERVATION FUND$10,000
GOOD GRIEF OF NW OHIO$8,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY KELLEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$5,000
BLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY$5,000
EMERSON SCHOOL$5,000
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$3,500
HURON WATERLOO PATHWAYS INITIATIVE$2,500
US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES & IMMIGRANTS$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOMESTRETCH: $2k → 4%HOMESTRETCH: $2k → 4%HOMESTRETCH: $2k → 4%HOMESTRETCH: $1k → 4%HOMESTRETCH: $1k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CA
VA
MD
DC
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 31 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
23

Total granted

$1.8M
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+17%

Still filing today

65%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DENISON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $487k · revenue +39%
  • TT
    THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART
    7× · 2017–2024 · $245k · revenue +34%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    2× · 2018–2019 · $125k · revenue +195% · 47% of their budget

Funded once

  • AW
    AFRICAN WILDLIFE CONSERVATION FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $17k
  • FW
    FRANKLIN WELLS FOR THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -87%
  • FW
    FRANKLIN WELLS FOR THE WORLD
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
2
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

3
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is Kirotshe Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsEnvironmental Conservation …Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Women & Girls Leadership De…Community College Foundatio…Animal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%7%5–10yr21%13%10–20yr14%27%20–35yr16%17%35–55yr20%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%1%5–10yr21%5%10–20yr14%4%20–35yr16%24%35–55yr20%67%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/34
the rest of the field
11%
8,036/74,272

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $250,000 · OtherLAWRENCE UNIVERSITYMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTR — $130,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTRUniversity of Michigan — $125,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganPROMEDICA FOUNDATION YWCA CAPITAL CAMPAIGN — $60,000 · OtherPROMEDICA FOUNDATION YWCA CAPITAL CAMPAIGNDAYCROFT SCHOOL — $38,000 · OtherTHE ARTS COMMISSION — $29,000 · Other+26 more — $193,515 · Other+26 moreDENISON UNIVERSITY — $487,000 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITYWEST SIDE MONTESSORI — $95,000 · EducationWEST SIDE MONTESSORIGLENVIEW METHODIST PRESCHOOL INC — $44,500 · EducationGLENVIEW METHODIST PRESCHOOL INC+4 more — $23,500 · EducationTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART — $245,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TOLEDO MUSE…KRASL ART CENTER INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $2,500 · Arts & CultureAfrican Wildlife Conservation Fund Inc — $42,000 · AnimalsBLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY — $15,000 · AnimalsZIMBABWE RHINO PROJECT — $6,000 · Animals+3 more — $4,000 · AnimalsPROMEDICA FOUNDATION — $60,000 · Public BenefitFRANKLIN WELLS FOR THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $14,111 · International+1 more — $1,000 · InternationalELE'S PLACE INC — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS GROUP — $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$825,515Education$650,000Arts & Culture$257,500Animals$67,000Public Benefit$60,000International$30,111Youth Development$18,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY — $487,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART — $245,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $125,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetWEST SIDE MONTESSORI — $95,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPROMEDICA FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLENVIEW METHODIST PRESCHOOL INC — $44,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetAfrican Wildlife Conservation Fund Inc — $42,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetBLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC — $15,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFRANKLIN WELLS FOR THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $14,111 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEMERSON SCHOOL INC — $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH SHORE COUNTRY CLUB — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKRASL ART CENTER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHomestretch Inc — $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budget826 MICHIGAN INC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetZIMBABWE RHINO PROJECT — $6,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHURON WATERLOO PATHWAYS INITIATIVE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS GROUP — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAnn Arbor Spark Foundation — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HAMILTON COUNTY SPCA INC DBA SPCA CINCINNATI — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK TUDOR FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Cauldron Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREWILD — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARCADE COMEDY THEATER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarmony Fund Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds WEST SIDE MONTESSORI
  • Who funds PROMEDICA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GLENVIEW METHODIST PRESCHOOL INC
  • Who funds African Wildlife Conservation Fund Inc
  • Who funds BLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds FRANKLIN WELLS FOR THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds EMERSON SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE COUNTRY CLUB
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds KRASL ART CENTER INC
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
  • Who funds US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC
  • Who funds DEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH
  • Who funds Homestretch Inc
  • Who funds 826 MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds ZIMBABWE RHINO PROJECT
  • Who funds HURON WATERLOO PATHWAYS INITIATIVE
  • Who funds KIROTSHE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The Martin Family Foundation · Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · Hylant Family Foundation Inc · Premier Bank Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Scott & Margy Trumbull Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Scott & Margy Trumbull Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Scott & Margy Trumbull Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph