Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

Sciarra Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2024
100%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$4.1M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 100% of the organizations Sciarra Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $515k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Civil RightsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$40k80%
FY20243$515k100%
FY20232$200k100%
FY20221$100k100%
FY20213$295kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$505kHousing & Shelter$150kEducation$145kPhilanthropy$120kHuman Services$100kCommunity Improvement$100kYouth Development$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Sciarra Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The American Independent Foundation$500,00011%
Lifemoves$150,00010%
Education Law Center Inc$120,00014%
The Bell Policy Center$100,00014%
Gofundmeorg$100,00010%
Oshman Family Jewish Community Center$100,00010%
San Francisco Education Fund$25,00010%
Aspen Valley Hospital Foundation$10,0001n/a
Anderson County Arts Council$10,00021%
Jewish Resource Center$10,0001n/a
The Aspen Country Day School Inc$10,00010%
The Buddy Program Inc$10,00010%
Aspen Jewish Center$5,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Sciarra Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe American Independent Foundation: $500,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLifemoves: $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEducation Law Center Inc: $120,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetThe Bell Policy Center: $100,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGofundmeorg: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOshman Family Jewish Community Center: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSan Francisco Education Fund: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAnderson County Arts Council: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetThe Aspen Country Day School Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Buddy Program Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAspen Jewish Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Sciarra Foundation with peer funders

About Sciarra Foundation

How much does Sciarra Foundation give?
Sciarra Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $60,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does Sciarra Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (45%), Housing & Shelter (13%), Education (13%).
Who are Sciarra Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: The American Independent Foundation ($500k), Lifemoves ($150k), Education Law Center Inc ($120k).
Does Sciarra Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Sciarra Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Sciarra Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Sciarra Foundation based?
Sciarra Foundation is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sciarra’s filings →

More from the funding graph