Skip to content
Schwartztrauber Good Samaritan Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Schwartztrauber Good Samaritan Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2022
34
Grants FY2022
11
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Philanthropy$2.4MEducation$120kReligion$77kPublic Safety & Disaster$63kHuman Services$35kHealth$30kFood & Nutrition$23kArts & Culture$19kOther$0
02FY2022 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k30 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $124k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.4M
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RINDERKNECHT FAMILY GIVING FUND (DAF) - CO FIDELITY$2,400,000
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION$73,785
LUTHERAN DISASTER SERVICES$50,000
U OF IA CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT$10,500
OPERATION HEALING FORCES - CLEARWATER FL$5,000
GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,000
MUST MINISTRIES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,000
WYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INC$5,000
GLORIA DEI LUTHERAN CHURCH$4,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$3,000
SIOUXLAND FOOD BANK$3,000
HOPE MINISTRIES$3,000
EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ASCRS FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%JOPPA OUTREACH: $4k → 10%JOPPA OUTREACH: $2k → 10%HOPE MINISTRIES: $5k → 10%HOPE MINISTRIES: $3k → 10%HOPE MINISTRIES: $3k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
NJ
MO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

9%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$250k · 37 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2022, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
24

Total granted

$250k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+40%

Still filing today

51%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HOPE MINISTRIES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +7%
  • MM
    Must Ministries Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +46%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $8k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • EL
    ELCA LUTHERAN DISASTER RELIEF
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • FL
    FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH - SIOUX CITY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • GD
    GLORIA DEI LUTHERAN CHURCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
2
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
3
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
4
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
7
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
8
Inova Health System Foundation

Inova health system foundation is the parent of inova health system (ihs). ihs provides healthcare and related services throughout northern virginia and the greater metropolitan washington, d.c. area, including certain contiguous counties…

Health
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dallas County Conservation Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
27/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RINDERKNECHT FAMILY GIVING FUND (DAF) - CO FIDELITY: $2,400,000 · OtherRINDERKNECHT FAMILY GIVING FUND (DAF) - CO FIDELITY+51 more: $355,008 · Other+51 moreHOPE MINISTRIES: $11,000 · Human ServicesMust Ministries Inc: $11,000 · Human ServicesJOPPA: $5,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesGREATER CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyASSOCIATION OF SMALL FOUNDATIONS: $1,000 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 · InternationalSHINING CITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · InternationalSELF-HELP INTERNATIONAL: $4,500 · InternationalCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $1,935 · InternationalFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $6,500 · Food & NutritionOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $2,500 · Food & NutritionDES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS: $6,000 · Community ImprovementDALLAS COUNTY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EnvironmentGREATER DES MOINES BOTANICAL GARDEN: $3,000 · Environment
Other$2,755,008Human Services$35,500Philanthropy$22,000International$21,435Food & Nutrition$14,000Community Improvement$6,000Environment$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE MINISTRIES: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMust Ministries Inc: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHINING CITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOPPA: $5,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSELF-HELP INTERNATIONAL: $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION INC: $3,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS COUNTY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetGREATER DES MOINES BOTANICAL GARDEN: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR HOME INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DES MOINES: $2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HERTKO HOLLOW INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAGAPE PREGNANCY CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $1,935 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SMALL FOUNDATIONS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $523 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSATURDAY IN THE PARK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHENS COLLEGE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Must Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHINING CITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds DES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOPPA ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds SELF-HELP INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS COUNTY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER DES MOINES BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DES MOINES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Grea…Meredith Corporation …The West Bancorporati…R & R Realty Group Fo…Athene Charitable Fou…The Merchants Bonding…The Independent Chari…Mary K and Daniel M K…Bookey Family Foundat…EMC Insurance Foundat…Pella Rolscreen Found…Prairie Meadows Race …
Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA23.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Meredith Corporation Foundation · The West Bancorporation Foundation Inc · R & R Realty Group Foundation · Athene Charitable Foundation · The Merchants Bonding Company Foundation · The Independent Charitable Gift Fund · Mary K and Daniel M Kelly Family Foundation C/O Dan Kelly · Bookey Family Foundation · EMC Insurance Foundation · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schwartztrauber Good Samaritan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schwartztrauber Good Samaritan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schwartztrauber Good Samaritan’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home