· Private foundation
The Merchants Bonding Company Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k172 grants · $172k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $194k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $103k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION | $102,805 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| GREAT OUTDOORS FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| MERCYONE DES MOINES FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| VARIETY - THE CHILDRENS CHARITY | $15,400 |
| EVERYSTEP FOUNDATION | $12,750 |
| GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE DES MOINES | $10,750 |
| DOROTHY'S HOUSE | $10,250 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA | $10,000 |
| DES MOINES CAROUSEL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BLANK CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| GREATER DES MOINES PUBLIC ART FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CHILDSERVE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| GENESIS YOUTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| WEST DES MOINES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
156 repeat relationships — 81 still active in FY2025, 75 since wound down; 101 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VTVARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA7× · 2018–2025 · $239k · revenue +35%
- CCCHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION8× · 2018–2025 · $109k · revenue +28%
- GOGREAT OUTDOORS FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- AEAGC EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +88%
- NANATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLSone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -22%
- HCHCI CARE SERVICESone grant, 2018 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.
Founded in 1995 as the philanthropic arm of the iowa credit union league and guided by the credit union philosophy of "people helping people", the iowa credit union foundation (the foundation) works to champion financial well-being for…
Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.
To provide financial assistance to unity healthcare to help enable it to carry out its exempt function of providing health care to the community.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
To eliminate hunger in south dakota.
To provide high-quality and compassionate care to community members approaching the end of life.
To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness
The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.
The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.
To improve the health of the people and communities we serve.
Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childserve Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Iowa Rugby Collective Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 38. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
274 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 274 of the 411 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds GREAT OUTDOORS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AGC EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SCKIC Inc ↗
- Who funds DES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA ↗
- Who funds ORCHARD PLACE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF IOWA INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WAUKEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JOPPA ↗
- Who funds BRAVO GREATER DES MOINES INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER DES MOINES PUBLIC ART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN ↗
- Who funds DES MOINES METRO OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FORWARD ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL IOWA ↗
- Who funds GREATER DES MOINES BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds WESLEYLIFE ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: EMC Insurance Foundation · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · Ita Group Foundation · The West Bancorporation Foundation Inc · Meredith Corporation Foundation · Golf Charitable Foundation of Greater Des Moines · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Athene Charitable Foundation · Variety - the Children's Charity of Iowa · United Way of Central Iowa · R & R Realty Group Foundation · Pella Rolscreen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Merchants Bonding Company Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Rehabilitation Center in — 26% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Merchants Bonding Company Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Merchants Bonding Company Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.