· Private foundation
Schwartztrauber Good Samaritan Foundation Inc
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k30 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $124k
- $250k+1 grant · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RINDERKNECHT FAMILY GIVING FUND (DAF) - CO FIDELITY | $2,400,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION | $73,785 |
| LUTHERAN DISASTER SERVICES | $50,000 |
| U OF IA CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT | $10,500 |
| WYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INC | $5,000 |
| MUST MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH | $5,000 |
| FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH | $5,000 |
| OPERATION HEALING FORCES - CLEARWATER FL | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| GLORIA DEI LUTHERAN CHURCH | $4,000 |
| HOPE MINISTRIES | $3,000 |
| SIOUXLAND FOOD BANK | $3,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $3,000 |
| EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2022, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HMHOPE MINISTRIES3× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +7%
- MMMust Ministries Inc3× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +46%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC2× · 2021–2022 · $8k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- ELELCA LUTHERAN DISASTER RELIEFone grant, 2020 · $10k
- FLFIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH - SIOUX CITYone grant, 2020 · $10k
- GDGLORIA DEI LUTHERAN CHURCH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
To eliminate hunger in south dakota.
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
Inova health system foundation is the parent of inova health system (ihs). ihs provides healthcare and related services throughout northern virginia and the greater metropolitan washington, d.c. area, including certain contiguous counties…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
End hunger together.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dallas County Conservation Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Must Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds SHINING CITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds DES MOINES PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds JOPPA ↗
- Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds SELF-HELP INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR HOME INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER DES MOINES BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds DALLAS COUNTY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Meredith Corporation Foundation · The West Bancorporation Foundation Inc · R & R Realty Group Foundation · Athene Charitable Foundation · The Merchants Bonding Company Foundation · The Independent Charitable Gift Fund · Mary K and Daniel M Kelly Family Foundation C/O Dan Kelly · Bookey Family Foundation · EMC Insurance Foundation · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Schwartztrauber Good Samaritan Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.