· Private foundation
Bookey Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k29 grants · $72k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $453k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $540k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DES MOINES METRO OPERA | $234,999 |
| CENTER FOR GENDER & REFUGEE STUDIES | $125,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP | $75,000 |
| DES MOINES ART CENTER | $52,797 |
| GREATER DES MOINES PUBLIC ART FOUNDATION | $52,015 |
| WILLIAM G STOWE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $33,334 |
| MADRE | $30,451 |
| FRIENDS OF DES MOINES PARKS | $26,000 |
| BRAVO GREATER DES MOINES | $25,772 |
| MOSAIC THEATER COMPANY | $25,000 |
| DC COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM | $25,000 |
| MARGARET'S VILLAGE | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| WE NEED DIVERSE BOOKS | $25,000 |
| EVERYLIBRARY INSTITUTE NFP | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $222k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
97 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EAEdmundson Art Foundation Inc4× · 2020–2025 · $433k · revenue +80%
- DMDES MOINES METRO OPERA INC5× · 2020–2025 · $361k · revenue +89%
MADRE INC7× · 2017–2025 · $257k · revenue +1%
Funded once
THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +22%- PFPEACE FOR DCone grant, 2023 · $25k
- SSSIDEWALK SCHOOL INCone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.
Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.
Our mission is to champion the iowa city downtown district as a progressive, healthy, and culturally-vibrant urban center of the region.
To build and support diverse communities of writers and audiences through the transformative power of story. We lead by inclusion and collaboration, celebrating the emotions, discovery and connections inspired by the written word in all…
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…
Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.
Iowa sister states is dedicated to connecting iowans with the world community. our mission is to develop and implement international partnerships and programs that promote the cultural, economic, and other interests of iowa and its friends…
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. greater des moines habitat for humanity…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The foundation for the iowa city community school district connects the community with our schools to ensure every student has extraordinary learning experiences. together we empower teachers and district staff and inspire students to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Des Moines Partnership and the most unlike its peers is World Food Prize Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 38. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Edmundson Art Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DES MOINES METRO OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds MADRE INC ↗
- Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DES MOINES SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP ↗
- Who funds WE NEED DIVERSE BOOKS ↗
- Who funds MARGARETS VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds URBAN DREAMS ↗
- Who funds ISISERETTES DRILL AND DRUM CORPS IN ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds EDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA ↗
- Who funds UC LAW SF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER DES MOINES PUBLIC ART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ECHOING GREEN INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DES MOINES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Everylibrary Institute Nfp ↗
- Who funds Mujeres Unidas y Activas ↗
- Who funds DES MOINES PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IOWA PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
- Who funds BRAVO GREATER DES MOINES INC ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM G STOWE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds AL OTRO LADO ↗
- Who funds HORTON'S KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Friendship Place ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY IN HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Meredith Corporation Foundation · The West Bancorporation Foundation Inc · The Merchants Bonding Company Foundation · Gartner Family Foundation % Michael G Gartner · EMC Insurance Foundation · John Ruan Foundation Trust · William C Knapp Charitable Fdn · Bravo Greater Des Moines Inc · Mary K and Daniel M Kelly Family Foundation C/O Dan Kelly · Ita Group Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bookey Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bookey Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Bookey Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.