Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schultze Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$69kEducation$24kHuman Services$12kHousing & Shelter$8kYouth Development$7kArts & Culture$5kRecreation & Sports$4kEnvironment$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$580k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$7,500
DON BOSCO COMMUNITY CENTER$3,000
GOOD COUNSEL HOMES$2,000
CITY SQUASH$1,500
ST IGNATIUS SCHOOL$1,000
RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION$1,000
RYE NATURE CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SQUASH HAVEN: $2k → 12%SQUASH HAVEN: $1k → 12%SQUASH HAVEN: $1k → 12%CARVER CENTER: $1k → 9%SQUASH HAVEN: $850 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 12 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$125k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+61%

Still filing today

42%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SQUASH HAVEN INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $4k · revenue +208%
  • SH
    SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +82%
  • TR
    THE RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • RS
    RESURRECTION SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • RF
    RYE FREE READING ROOM
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +23%
  • NP
    NAT PKU ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
The York School

York school is an award-winning, private, coed college-prep school for grades 8-12, that develops confident and authentic leaders. we offer an academically challenging experiential program for bright, kind, and driven students in an…

Education
3
Cold Spring School Inc

Cold spring school challenges children to become self-reliant, curious and resourceful problem solvers with the academic and social skills to engage constructively and ethically in our diverse, changing world.

Education
4
Brooklyn Youth Sports Club Inc

The purpose of the organization is to build an enriching educational setting for under-served brooklyn youth, using athletics as a vehicle to inspire them to fulfill their academic, physical, and personal potential. bkysc is driven by an…

Recreation & Sports
5
Rye Youth Soccer Club Inc

The program was formed to foster, promote, encourage and support the playing of soccer in the city of rye, new york.

—
6
The Charles River School Inc

A pre-kindergarten through grade 8 independent school committed to academic excellence and the joy of childhood, fostering intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and the development of the whole child.

Education
7
The City University of New York School of Law Foundation Inc

The foundation supports the law school in its mission to increase access to legal education to those from groups underrepresented in the profession and to prepare its graduates for public interest and public service practice.

Education
8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
Cristo Rey New York Corporate Work Study Program Inc

The purpose of the cwsp is to provide cristo rey new york high school with work study for the students. the cwsp engages corporate sponsors to provide students with part-time jobs within their organization to enhance the student's…

Education
10
Brunswick School Inc

Brunswick school, inc. is a day school for boys in pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade. the purpose of the school is to educate the "whole boy". it does so by helping boys and young men - without regard to culture, ethnicity or religion…

Education
11
Westchester Secondary Charter School

Westchester secondary charter school will provide students in grades 6-12 with a challenging and comprehensive college preparatory education in a public school setting employing the technology of the 21st century. we will inspire students…

—
12
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rye Free Reading Room; the most unlike its peers is Port Chester Carver Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RESURRECTION FOUNDATION: $69,061 · OtherRESURRECTION FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRESURRECTION SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $9,500 · OtherRESURRECTION SCHOOL FOUNDATIONDON BOSCO COMMUNITY CENTER: $9,000 · OtherDON BOSCO COMMUNITY CENTERGOOD COUNSEL HOMES: $8,000 · OtherGOOD COUNSEL HOMESSCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD: $7,855 · OtherSCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD+13 more: $22,645 · Other+13 moreSQUASH HAVEN INC: $4,350 · Human ServicesPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCity Squash Inc: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,538 · EducationTHE JAY HERITAGE CENTER: $2,000 · Arts & CulturePART OF THE SOLUTION: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$136,561Human Services$5,350Recreation & Sports$3,000Education$2,538Arts & Culture$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSQUASH HAVEN INC: $4,350 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCity Squash Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,538 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRYE FREE READING ROOM: $2,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JAY HERITAGE CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SQUASH HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds City Squash Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds RYE FREE READING ROOM ↗
  • Who funds THE JAY HERITAGE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PART OF THE SOLUTION ↗
  • Who funds PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA12.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schultze Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schultze Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Squash Haven Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schultze’s filings →

More from the funding graph