Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Schultze Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$69kEducation$24kHuman Services$12kHousing & Shelter$8kYouth Development$7kArts & Culture$5kRecreation & Sports$4kEnvironment$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$580k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$7,500
DON BOSCO COMMUNITY CENTER$3,000
GOOD COUNSEL HOMES$2,000
CITY SQUASH$1,500
RYE NATURE CENTER$1,000
RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
ST IGNATIUS SCHOOL$1,000
SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SQUASH HAVEN: $2k → 12%SQUASH HAVEN: $1k → 12%SQUASH HAVEN: $1k → 12%SQUASH HAVEN: $850 → 12%CARVER CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$125k · 12 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$125k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+61%

Still filing today

42%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SQUASH HAVEN INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $4k · revenue +208%
  • SH
    SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +47%
  • TR
    THE RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • RS
    RESURRECTION SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • RF
    RYE FREE READING ROOM
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +23%
  • NP
    NAT PKU ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
The York School

York school is an award-winning, private, coed college-prep school for grades 8-12, that develops confident and authentic leaders. we offer an academically challenging experiential program for bright, kind, and driven students in an…

Education
3
Cold Spring School Inc

Cold spring school challenges children to become self-reliant, curious and resourceful problem solvers with the academic and social skills to engage constructively and ethically in our diverse, changing world.

Education
4
Brooklyn Youth Sports Club Inc

The purpose of the organization is to build an enriching educational setting for under-served brooklyn youth, using athletics as a vehicle to inspire them to fulfill their academic, physical, and personal potential. bkysc is driven by an…

Recreation & Sports
5
Rye Youth Soccer Club Inc

The program was formed to foster, promote, encourage and support the playing of soccer in the city of rye, new york.

6
The Charles River School Inc

A pre-kindergarten through grade 8 independent school committed to academic excellence and the joy of childhood, fostering intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and the development of the whole child.

Education
7
The City University of New York School of Law Foundation Inc

The foundation supports the law school in its mission to increase access to legal education to those from groups underrepresented in the profession and to prepare its graduates for public interest and public service practice.

Education
8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
Cristo Rey New York Corporate Work Study Program Inc

The purpose of the cwsp is to provide cristo rey new york high school with work study for the students. the cwsp engages corporate sponsors to provide students with part-time jobs within their organization to enhance the student's…

Education
10
Brunswick School Inc

Brunswick school, inc. is a day school for boys in pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade. the purpose of the school is to educate the "whole boy". it does so by helping boys and young men - without regard to culture, ethnicity or religion…

Education
11
Westchester Secondary Charter School

Westchester secondary charter school will provide students in grades 6-12 with a challenging and comprehensive college preparatory education in a public school setting employing the technology of the 21st century. we will inspire students…

12
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rye Free Reading Room and the most unlike its peers is Port Chester Carver Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RESURRECTION FOUNDATION — $69,061 · OtherRESURRECTION FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRESURRECTION SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $9,500 · OtherRESURRECTION SCHOOL FOUNDATIONDON BOSCO COMMUNITY CENTER — $9,000 · OtherDON BOSCO COMMUNITY CENTERGOOD COUNSEL HOMES — $8,000 · OtherGOOD COUNSEL HOMESSCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD — $7,855 · OtherSCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD+13 more — $22,645 · Other+13 moreSQUASH HAVEN INC — $4,350 · Human ServicesPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesCity Squash Inc — $3,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $2,538 · EducationTHE JAY HERITAGE CENTER — $2,000 · Arts & CulturePART OF THE SOLUTION — $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$136,561Human Services$5,350Recreation & Sports$3,000Education$2,538Arts & Culture$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSQUASH HAVEN INC — $4,350 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCity Squash Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $2,538 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRYE FREE READING ROOM — $2,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JAY HERITAGE CENTER — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SQUASH HAVEN INC
  • Who funds SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds City Squash Inc
  • Who funds THE RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds RYE FREE READING ROOM
  • Who funds THE JAY HERITAGE CENTER
  • Who funds PART OF THE SOLUTION
  • Who funds PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA12.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Schultze Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Squash Haven Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph