Skip to content
Schultz Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Schultz Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
66
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$15MEmployment$15MHuman Services$12MYouth Development$6.2MCommunity Improvement$5.1MPhilanthropy$4.1MInternational$3.9MCrime & Legal$3.3MOther$0
02FY2024 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $370k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $3.7M
  • $250k+15 grants · $8.1M
$100,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$355M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURNING GLASS INSTITUTE$1,350,000
YOUTHCARE$1,080,000
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$750,000
SKILLUP COALITION$500,000
VETJOBS$500,000
NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$500,000
UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATION INC$500,000
NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES$470,000
SERVEMINNESOTA$445,000
HIRE HEROES USA$400,000
BUILDING CHANGES$400,000
YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE$359,000
BRAVEN INC$300,000
THINK OF US$285,751
VEHICLES FOR CHANGE$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $8.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT: $15k → 11%WELCOMING ALLIANCE FOR REFUGEE MINISTRY WARM INC: $15k → 11%HELLO NEIGHBOR: $225k → 11%Family Independence Initiative: $1.0M → 10%IFOSTER: $164k → 11%Eleanor Whitmore Early Childhood Center: $30k → 7%HEARTS & HOMES FOR REFUGEES: $15k → 9%REFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $15k → 9%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY INC: $45k → 10%WORKMONEY FOUNDATION: $150k → 17%LIFE WORKS: $23k → 13%ONE WORLD ONE LOVE: $45k → 10%MOZAIC: $15k → 4%REACT DC: $15k → 6%VEHICLES FOR CHANGE: $250k → 11%ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUCCESS: $45k → 7%HELLO NEIGHBOR: $20k → 11%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $20k → 7%Military Spouse Corporate Career Network: $125k → 10%WORKMONEY FOUNDATION: $150k → 17%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $200k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $20k → 23%AUSTIN AREA URBAN LEAGUE: $20k → 10%OPPORTUNITY AMERICA EDUCATIONAL FUND: $600k → 14%OPPORTUNITY AMERICA EDUCATIONAL FUND: $600k → 14%THINK OF US: $286k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $250k → 9%Jewish Family Services: $200k → 9%SUMMIT COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 9%NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES: $25k → 9%American Corporate Partners: $300k → 17%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $125k → 17%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $100k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $20k → 17%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $50k → 17%El Centro de la Raza: $55k → 9%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $25k → 9%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $25k → 9%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $25k → 9%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $25k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $483k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $359k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $333k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $315k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $1.1M → 9%YOUTHCARE: $60k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $50k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61M · 98 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

98 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2024, 60 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

98
190

Total granted

$61M
$14M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+24%

Still filing today

88%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $8.5M · revenue +29%
  • HH
    HIRE HEROES USA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +140%
  • BG
    BURNING GLASS INSTITUTE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • BF
    Brothers for Life
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -1%
  • FII - NATIONAL
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue -92%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2020 · $990k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
2
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
3
Upwardly Global

Upwardly global removes employment barriers for immigrant, refugee, and asylee professionals while advancing the inclusion of their skills into the u.s. economy.

Employment
4
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
5
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
6
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—
7
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
8
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
9
Digital Harbor Foundation

Democratizing societal and economic well-being through digital equity for everyone, increased diversity in the tech sector, innovative education, and technology for the public good

Education
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
12
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Century Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Falis Community Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

283 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 283 of the 332 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
39
Early backer (in before they grew)
282/283
Grantees still filing
169/283
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $8,500,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYHIRE HEROES USA INC: $2,300,000 · EducationHIRE HEROES USA INCSKILLUP COALITION: $1,920,000 · EducationSKILLUP COALITION+20 more: $6,861,582 · Education+20 moreCORPORATE AMERICA SUPPORTS YOU VETJOBSCOM: $1,400,000 · OtherWASHINGTON SERVICE CORPS: $1,172,489 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $989,599 · OtherUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $2,000,000 · OtherUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INCPANORAMA GLOBAL: $1,160,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC: $989,599 · OtherBrothers for Life: $1,000,000 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND: $1,002,477 · Other+92 more: $19,010,038 · Other+92 moreTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $1,490,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG M…YOUTHCARE: $1,247,500 · Human ServicesYOUTHCAREOPPORTUNITY AMERICA EDUCATIONAL FUND: $1,200,000 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY…FII - NATIONAL: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesFII - NATIO…AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $575,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CO…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $450,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMI…WORKMONEY FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · Human ServicesTHINK OF US: $285,751 · Human Services+14 more: $1,508,900 · Human Services+14 moreTHE NATIONAL MENTORING PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,626,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE NATIONA…Maris Place: $1,055,000 · Youth DevelopmentMaris PlaceBRAVEN INC: $900,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRAVEN INCIMENTOR INC: $825,000 · Youth DevelopmentIMENTOR INCPOINT SOURCE YOUTH INC: $815,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOINT SOURC…TREEHOUSE: $660,000 · Youth DevelopmentTREEHOUSEEXALT YOUTH: $650,000 · Youth DevelopmentEXALT YOUTHGIRLS INC: $575,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCCREDIBLE MESSENGER MENTORING MOVEMENT: $300,000 · Youth Development+4 more: $480,000 · Youth Development+4 moreBURNING GLASS INSTITUTE: $1,975,000 · EmploymentBURNING GL…VetJobs Inc: $1,500,000 · EmploymentVetJobs In…YOUTHBUILD GLOBAL INC: $1,250,000 · EmploymentYOUTHBUILD…WORKLIFE PARTNERSHIP: $700,000 · EmploymentWORKLIFE P…CLIMB HIRE INC: $600,000 · EmploymentCLIMB HIRE…JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $400,000 · EmploymentBALTIMORE CORPS INC: $400,000 · EmploymentSkill Growth: $300,000 · Employment+4 more: $475,000 · Employment+4 moreNEW PROFIT INC: $1,355,000 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $1,285,291 · Community ImprovementSERVEMINNESOTA: $695,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ONESTAR FOUNDATION: $410,000 · Community ImprovementFAIR COUNT INC: $350,000 · Community Improvement+6 more: $250,000 · Community ImprovementROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $580,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $454,580 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $425,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATION: $345,000 · PhilanthropyTravis Manion Foundation: $260,000 · PhilanthropyMichigan Association of United Ways Inc: $225,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican Association of State Service Commissions: $157,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $125,979 · Philanthropy+11 more: $595,000 · Philanthropy
Education$19,581,582Other$28,724,202Human Services$8,057,151Youth Development$7,886,000Employment$7,600,000Community Improvement$4,345,291Philanthropy$3,168,059

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $8,500,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHIRE HEROES USA INC: $2,300,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $2,000,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBURNING GLASS INSTITUTE: $1,975,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetSKILLUP COALITION: $1,920,000 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MENTORING PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,626,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetVetJobs Inc: $1,500,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $1,490,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNEW PROFIT INC: $1,355,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $1,285,291 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetYOUTHBUILD GLOBAL INC: $1,250,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetYOUTHCARE: $1,247,500 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY AMERICA EDUCATIONAL FUND: $1,200,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $1,160,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMaris Place: $1,055,000 over 3y, 98% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $1,002,477 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBrothers for Life: $1,000,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFII - NATIONAL: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $989,599 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAVEN INC: $900,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetIMENTOR INC: $825,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetPOINT SOURCE YOUTH INC: $815,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetTHE GET SCHOOLED FOUNDATION: $800,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES: $770,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetBUILDING CHANGES: $719,920 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetWORKLIFE PARTNERSHIP: $700,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetJOIN FREEWORLD INC: $700,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetSERVEMINNESOTA: $695,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $660,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $655,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetEXALT YOUTH: $650,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetTHE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORK: $600,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCLIMB HIRE INC: $600,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetCOOP Careers Inc: $600,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $580,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INC: $575,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $575,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $555,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $555,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING THROUGH GIVING FOUNDATION: $550,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetCOMMON THREADS FARM: $529,582 over 2y, 40% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $525,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN FOR THE FAIR SENTENCING OF YOUTH: $505,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetTHE NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetCAREERVILLAGE INC: $500,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC: $500,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $500,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAIR FIGHT ACTION INC: $500,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationSeattle FoundationUnited Way of King Co…Raikes FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Medina FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…Casey Family ProgramsMoccasin Lake Foundat…Real Progress Foundat…Liberty Mutual Founda…Grousemont Foundation
Gates FoundationWA54.1× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Raikes Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Medina Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Casey Family Programs · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Real Progress Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Grousemont Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schultz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schultz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Youthbuild Global Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Vehicles for Change Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Baltimore Corps Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Jobs for the Future Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Silver Lining Mentoring Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • United Way of Essex & West Hudson D/B/a United Way of Greater Newark: 2% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Hope for Haiti Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Hands in for Youth Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
64report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Schultz Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Schultz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 332 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schultz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home