Skip to content
School-Based Health Alliance at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

School-Based Health Alliance

The School-Based Health Alliance works to support and grow sbhcs by establishing and advocating for national policy priorities; by promoting high quality clinical practices and standards, including telehealth; through data collection, reporting, evaluation and research, and by providing training, technical assistance, and consultation.

$5.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$863k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$10MHuman Services$3.5MEducation$771kEmployment$250kCommunity Improvement$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$16k
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $251k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+7 grants · $3.6M
$89,625
Median grant
8
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Child and Family Agency of SE CT Inc$862,821
Integrated Health Services Inc$639,113
Klingberg Comprehensive Family Services$611,118
Cornell Scott-Hill Health Corp$498,639
United Community and Family Services Inc$459,007
Norwalk Community Health Center$280,372
Hartford Public Schools$270,952
InterCommunity Inc$236,248
Wheeler Clinic$132,048
Family Centers Inc$124,969
Legacy Community Health Services$107,600
University of Illinois at Chicago$97,500
FamilyCare Health Centers$92,625
New River Health Association Inc$92,625
El Pueblo Health Services Inc$92,625
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Child and Family Agency of SE CT INC: $2.0M → 9%Child and Family Agency of SE CT Inc: $863k → 9%CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SE CT INC: $12k → 9%CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SE CT INC: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MI
CT
CO
MD
NM
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 28 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
6

Total granted

$19M
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+27%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +52%
  • IH
    Integrated Health Services Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +6% · 56% of their budget
  • KC
    KLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $63k · revenue +12%
  • CA
    COLO ASSOCIATION FOR SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH CAREgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +27%
  • RM
    Rocky Mountain Youth Medical and Nursing
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penobscot Community Health Center

Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

Health
2
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
3
Charles River Community Health Inc

To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.

Health
4
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
5
Community Health Center of Franklin County Incorporated

The full mission of the community health center of franklin county, inc is to maintain a community owned, responsive health center which promotes public health and well-being, and provides comprehensive preventative and primary care…

Health
6
Central Texas Community Health Centers

Communitycare operates 25 health center locations offering comprehensive primary care services for the entire family including pediatrics, behavioral health services, and dental care.

Health
7
Community First Health Centers

We provide high quality, patient centered health care that is respectful, compassionate and accessible to all members of our community.

Health
8
Community Health Center of Northeast Oklahoma

We recognize the diversity of the communities we serve and we are guided by our vision and commitment towards providing excellent primary care to our patients and their families. see schedule o for more information.

Health
9
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
10
Community Health Care Inc

Federally Qualified Health Center The Organization provides medical and dental services to all community members regardless of income level.

—
11
Detroit Community Health Connection

Dchc is a primary care organization committed to providing accessible, affordable and quality service to all members of the communities we serve.

—
12
Eastern Iowa Health Center

Eastern Iowa Health Center provides accessible, high-quality healthcare services to those in need in the Linn County, Iowa area. Our services include family medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, labor and delivery, behavioral…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health & Wellness Center of Greater Torrington Inc; the most unlike its peers is Newport-Mesa Schools Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
32/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE: $2,170,904 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMOREKLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,358,568 · OtherKLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES INCUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC: $1,306,565 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINCFAMILY CENTERS INC: $1,185,661 · OtherFAMILY CENTERS INCCITY OF HARTFORD: $738,621 · OtherCITY OF HARTFORD+18 more: $1,667,571 · Other+18 moreIntegrated Health Services Inc: $1,669,448 · HealthIntegrated Health Services IncCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,316,942 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCCORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION: $1,154,492 · HealthCORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATIONINTERCOMMUNITY INC: $832,619 · HealthINTERCOMMUNITY INCNORWALK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $681,177 · HealthNORWALK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERWHEELER CLINIC INC: $559,736 · HealthWHEELER CLINIC INCCHARTER OAK HEALTH CENTER INC: $400,000 · HealthFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $362,031 · Health+16 more: $935,314 · Health+16 moreCHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $2,892,632 · Human ServicesCHILD AND FAMILY…CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITIES INC: $814,179 · Community ImprovementMeridian Education Resource Group Inc: $92,625 · EducationPetersburg Medical Center: $72,209 · Public Benefit
Other$8,427,890Health$7,911,759Human Services$2,892,632Community Improvement$814,179Education$92,625Public Benefit$72,209

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $2,892,632 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetIntegrated Health Services Inc: $1,669,448 over 3y, 56% of budgetKLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,358,568 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,316,942 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC: $1,306,565 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILY CENTERS INC: $1,185,661 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION: $1,154,492 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINTERCOMMUNITY INC: $832,619 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITIES INC: $814,179 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNORWALK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $681,177 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetWHEELER CLINIC INC: $559,736 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHARTER OAK HEALTH CENTER INC: $400,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $362,031 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC: $186,683 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $141,375 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJessie Trice Community Health System Inc: $102,725 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER OF GREATER TORRINGTON INC: $93,241 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEl Pueblo Health Services Inc: $92,625 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMeridian Education Resource Group Inc: $92,625 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWOMENCARE INC: $92,625 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAS CLINICAS DEL NORTE INC: $92,625 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNew River Health Association Inc: $92,625 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPetersburg Medical Center: $72,209 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $62,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPCA INC: $29,851 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC: $28,564 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLO ASSOCIATION FOR SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH CARE: $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGreat Lakes Bay Health Centers: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Youth Medical and Nursing: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamai Community Health Center Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHUNDER BAY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVIC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBANY AREA PRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefReach Out and Read IncAmerican Cancer Socie…Harvard Pilgrim Healt…William Caspar Graust…Hartford Foundation f…Connecticut Health Fo…Americares Foundation…Community Health Netw…Community Health Netw…Community Health Netw…American Heart Associ…
Direct ReliefCA37.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Reach Out and Read Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Connecticut Health Foundation Inc · Americares Foundation Inc · Community Health Network of Connecticut Inc · Community Health Network of Connecticut Holdings Inc · Community Health Network of Connecticut Foundation Inc · American Heart Association Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization School-Based Health Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from School-Based Health Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Community Health Resources Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Connecticut Institute for Communities Inc: 57% of income from government
  • Child and Family Agency of Southeastern Connecticut Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Wheeler Clinic Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Community Health & Wellness Center of Greater Torrington Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Norwalk Community Health Center: 35% of income from government
  • Intercommunity Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Charter Oak Health Center Inc: 34% of income from government
  • United Community and Family Servicesinc: 29% of income from government
  • Optimus Health Care Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Family Centers Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Jessie Trice Community Health System Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Fair Haven Community Health Clinic Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Cornell Scott-Hill Health Corporation: 12% of income from government
  • Community Health Center Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Southwest Community Health Center Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Integrated Health Services Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on School-Based Health Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home