Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

School-Based Health Alliance

The School-Based Health Alliance works to support and grow sbhcs by establishing and advocating for national policy priorities; by promoting high quality clinical practices and standards, including telehealth; through data collection, reporting, evaluation and research, and by providing training, technical assistance, and consultation.

$9.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$10MHuman Services$3.5MEducation$771kEmployment$250kCommunity Improvement$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$16k
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $211k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $784k
  • $250k+12 grants · $8.2M
$209,906
Median grant
5
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Child and Family Agency of SE CT INC$2,012,561
Integrated Health Services Inc$851,717
Family Center Inc$845,379
Community Health Center Inc$781,480
United Community and Family Services Inc$704,391
Klingberg Comprehensive Family SVCS INC$636,977
Cornell Scott-Hill Health Corporation$512,621
InterCommunity Inc$470,140
Hartford Public Schools$401,354
Wheeler Clinic Inc$365,188
Norwalk Community Health Center$338,305
Charter Oak Health Center$300,000
Fair Haven Community Health Clinic$209,906
Optimus Health Care Inc$134,413
Danbury Public Schools$131,263
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Child and Family Agency of SE CT INC: $2.0M → 9%CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SE CT INC: $12k → 9%CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SE CT INC: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
MI
CT
CO
MD
NM
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 22 repeat orgs$277k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
6

Total granted

$14M
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+27%

Still filing today

73%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC
    3× · 2018–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +52%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +5%
  • FC
    FAMILY CENTERS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $63k · revenue +12%
  • CA
    COLO ASSOCIATION FOR SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH CAREgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +27%
  • RM
    Rocky Mountain Youth Medical and Nursing
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
2
Charles River Community Health Inc

To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.

Health
3
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
4
Community Health Center of Franklin County Incorporated

The full mission of the community health center of franklin county, inc is to maintain a community owned, responsive health center which promotes public health and well-being, and provides comprehensive preventative and primary care…

Health
5
Penobscot Community Health Center

Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

Health
6
Detroit Community Health Connection

Dchc is a primary care organization committed to providing accessible, affordable and quality service to all members of the communities we serve.

—
7
Community First Health Centers

We provide high quality, patient centered health care that is respectful, compassionate and accessible to all members of our community.

Health
8
Family Health Center of Worcesterinc

Family health center of worcester (fhcw) is a joint commissionaccredited, federally-qualified community health center that improves the health and well-being of traditionally underserved and culturally diverse populations in the greater…

—
9
Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of community health centers is to provide quality and compassionate primary healthcare services to central florida's diverse communities.

—
10
Edward M Kennedy Community Health Center Inc

Our vision is to be a constantly growing, financially sound community health center.

Health
11
Lynn Community Health Inc

To provide comprehensive healthcare of the highest quality for everyone in the greater lynn community regardless of ability to pay.(continued on schedule o.)our strongest commitment is to assure access to care for underserved members of…

—
12
Generations Family Health Center

To provide quality, affordable health care to residents of eastern connecticut.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornell Scott-Hill Health Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Newport-Mesa Schools Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr18%32%20–35yr14%38%35–55yr20%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr18%41%20–35yr14%35%35–55yr20%24%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
10%
2,154/22,400

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
32/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE — $2,170,904 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMOREFAMILY CENTERS INC — $1,060,692 · OtherFAMILY CENTERS INCUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC — $847,558 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINCKLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES INC — $747,450 · OtherKLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES INCCITY OF HARTFORD — $467,669 · OtherCITY OF HARTFORDAPEX EDUCATION INC — $249,900 · Other+5 more — $609,025 · Other+5 moreCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $1,316,942 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCIntegrated Health Services Inc — $1,030,335 · HealthIntegrated Health Services IncCORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION — $655,853 · HealthCORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATIONINTERCOMMUNITY INC — $596,371 · HealthINTERCOMMUNITY INCWHEELER CLINIC INC — $427,688 · HealthWHEELER CLINIC INCNORWALK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $400,805 · HealthNORWALK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERCHARTER OAK HEALTH CENTER INC — $400,000 · HealthCHARTER OAK HEALTH CENTER INCFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $272,406 · HealthOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC — $186,683 · Health+10 more — $251,173 · HealthCHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $2,029,811 · Human ServicesCHILD AND FAMIL…CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITIES INC — $814,179 · Community ImprovementMeridian Education Resource Group Inc — $33,775 · EducationPetersburg Medical Center — $21,778 · Public Benefit
Other$6,153,198Health$5,538,256Human Services$2,029,811Community Improvement$814,179Education$33,775Public Benefit$21,778

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $2,029,811 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $1,316,942 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY CENTERS INC — $1,060,692 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetIntegrated Health Services Inc — $1,030,335 over 2y, 56% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC — $847,558 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITIES INC — $814,179 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetKLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES INC — $747,450 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetCORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION — $655,853 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINTERCOMMUNITY INC — $596,371 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWHEELER CLINIC INC — $427,688 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNORWALK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $400,805 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCHARTER OAK HEALTH CENTER INC — $400,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $272,406 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC — $186,683 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER OF GREATER TORRINGTON INC — $93,241 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $62,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJessie Trice Community Health System Inc — $43,875 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMeridian Education Resource Group Inc — $33,775 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC — $33,775 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPetersburg Medical Center — $21,778 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLO ASSOCIATION FOR SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH CARE — $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGreat Lakes Bay Health Centers — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC — $14,282 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Youth Medical and Nursing — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHUNDER BAY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVIC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBANY AREA PRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefReach Out and Read IncAmerican Cancer Socie…Harvard Pilgrim Healt…William Caspar Graust…Hartford Foundation f…Connecticut Health Fo…Americares Foundation…Community Health Netw…Community Health Netw…Community Health Netw…American Heart Associ…
Direct ReliefCA37.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Reach Out and Read Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Connecticut Health Foundation Inc · Americares Foundation Inc · Community Health Network of Connecticut Inc · Community Health Network of Connecticut Holdings Inc · Community Health Network of Connecticut Foundation Inc · American Heart Association Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization School-Based Health Alliance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Community Health Resources Inc — 79% of income from government
  • Connecticut Institute for Communities Inc — 57% of income from government
  • Child and Family Agency of Southeastern Connecticut Inc — 55% of income from government
  • Wheeler Clinic Inc — 47% of income from government
  • Community Health & Wellness Center of Greater Torrington Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Norwalk Community Health Center — 35% of income from government
  • Intercommunity Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Charter Oak Health Center Inc — 34% of income from government
  • United Community and Family Servicesinc — 29% of income from government
  • Optimus Health Care Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Family Centers Inc — 20% of income from government
  • Jessie Trice Community Health System Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Fair Haven Community Health Clinic Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Cornell Scott-Hill Health Corporation — 12% of income from government
  • Community Health Center Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Southwest Community Health Center Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Integrated Health Services Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home