· Private foundation
Eileen & Fred Schoellkopf Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $112k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Connecticut College | $50,000 |
| Battery Foundation | $45,000 |
| Angel Flight West | $16,626 |
| Planned Parenthood | $10,000 |
| International Conservation Fund Corp | $10,000 |
| Union Station HOMELESS SERVICES | $10,000 |
| Tectonic Theater Project | $10,000 |
| World Central Kitchen | $10,000 |
| Reugee & Immigrant Transitions | $5,000 |
| GLIDE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| Mosaic Project | $5,000 |
| FULLBRIGHT ASSOCIATION INC | $5,000 |
| National Immigration Law Center | $5,000 |
| AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC | $5,000 |
| Casa Cornelia Law Center | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCONNECTICUT COLLEGE9× · 2017–2025 · $229k · revenue +23%
- CTCOLLEGE TRACK5× · 2020–2024 · $62k · revenue +79%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC7× · 2017–2023 · $59k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- FIFILM INDEPENDENT - NORITAone grant, 2020 · $30k
- IDINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION(FERGUSON RISES)one grant, 2021 · $22k
- CCCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORTone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Opera Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds Tectonic Theater Project Inc ↗
- Who funds AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE BATTERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Third Avenue Charitable Organization ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE MOSAIC PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Casa Cornelia Legal Services ↗
- Who funds Refugee & Immigrant Transitions ↗
- Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT ↗
- Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FULBRIGHT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds LANTERN PROJECTS INC LANTERN PROJECTS ↗
- Who funds International Conservation Fund Corp ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds LONG BEACH RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Refugee Foundation ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Film Society ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUSIC & MEMORY INC ↗
- Who funds Native American Heritage Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eileen & Fred Schoellkopf Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Autism Society of America Inc — 8% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.