Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schlum Charitable Trust Ua Mar 5 1990

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$332k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Science & Tech$450kArts & Culture$429kHealth$305kAnimals$205kHuman Services$190kFood & Nutrition$180kReligion$125kInternational$90kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $106k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MUSIC CENTER$56,000
CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION$50,000
NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM$35,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$25,000
LA GUILD FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH$25,000
TREE PEOPLE$25,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$25,000
CANINE COMPANIONS$25,000
SAN DIEGO ZOO WILDLIFE ALLIANCE$25,000
CROHN'S AND COLITIS FOUNDATION$10,000
OHEL SARA KITCHEN$5,000
FRIENDS OF BEVERLY HILLS LIBRARY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE COMPANIONS: $25k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS: $25k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS: $15k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS: $15k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 28 repeat orgs$322k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
9

Total granted

$1.6M
$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM SANTA MARIA CALIFORNIA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $135k · revenue +66% · 75% of their budget
  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +70%
  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO
    5× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • LH
    LAJ HEALTH
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • JF
    Jewish Film Institute
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • NH
    NATIONAL HISTORY MUSEUM
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
2
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
3
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
4
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
California Life Sciences Association

Clsa advances californias world-leading life sciences innovation ecosystem by advocating for effective national, state and local public policies and supporting entrepreneurs and life sciences businesses.

Community Improvement
10
La Jolla Institute for Immunology

At la jolla institute for immunology, our scientists focus on understanding how the immune system works in order to promote human health and prevent disease. our discoveries apply to many diseases, ranging from diabetes to heart disease,…

—
11
Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Inc

Accelerating science through its mission to cure, prevent or manage all diseases by the end of the 21st century.

Health
12
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Science Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ohel Sara Kitchen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $175,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKJEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING: $150,000 · OtherJEWISH HOME FOR THE AGINGOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $125,000 · OtherOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERLOS ANGELES OPERA: $100,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES OPERAHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION: $65,000 · OtherLA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $65,000 · OtherTHE MUSIC CENTER: $56,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS: $55,000 · OtherDISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherGRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Other+20 more: $426,000 · Other+20 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $325,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY F…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $50,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY A…THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM SANTA MARIA CALIFORNIA: $135,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATURAL…CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA …Jewish Film Institute: $25,000 · Arts & CultureJewish Film…Colonial Williamsburg Foundation: $12,500 · Arts & CultureColonial Wi…American Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $40,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthLUPUS LA CO EMERGE: $10,000 · HealthZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $85,000 · AnimalsTREEPEOPLE INC: $65,000 · Environment
Other$1,322,000International$375,000Arts & Culture$232,500Human Services$95,000Health$90,000Animals$85,000Environment$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $325,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $175,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM SANTA MARIA CALIFORNIA: $135,000 over 5y, 75% of budgetOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $95,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $65,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Film Institute: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLUPUS LA CO EMERGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM SANTA MARIA CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds TREEPEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Film Institute ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Virginia Friedhofer Charitable TrustCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Virginia Friedhofer Charitable Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schlum Charitable Trust Ua Mar 5 1990 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schlum Charitable Trust Ua Mar 5 1990. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schlum Charitable Trust Ua Mar 5 1990?

    Find your warmest path to Schlum Charitable Trust Ua Mar 5 1990 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schlum Charitable Trust Ua Mar 5 1990’s filings →

    More from the funding graph