· Private foundation
Schlinger Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k45 grants · $797k
- $50k–250k23 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+2 grants · $550k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE PRENTICE SCHOOL | $300,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA INC | $250,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER | $150,000 |
| CHOC FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $100,000 |
| AIDS SERVICES FOUNDATION ORANGE COUNTY | $100,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA INC | $100,000 |
| ST JUDE HOSPITAL | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| GIANT COMMUNITY FUND | $75,000 |
| CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR CHILD ABUSE ASSESSME | $53,000 |
| ROCK HOUSE CHURCH | $51,500 |
| THE LIVING DESERT | $50,000 |
| ESPERANZA WRESTLING BOOSTERS CLUB | $50,000 |
| WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $354k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
105 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 56 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $559k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EDENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +92%
- TPThe Prentice School4× · 2021–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +38%
- SSSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY3× · 2020–2022 · $733k · revenue +160%
Funded once
- CPCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +46%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $100k
- SPSTEPHEN PROUSE MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2023 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
To protect and steward in perpetuity the unique natural, cultural, and asthetic resources of the preserve and serve as a model of ecologically sustainable development to committees outside the preserve.
The santa barbara zoo is dedicated to the preservation, conservation, and enhancement of the natural world and its living treasures through education, research, recreation and conservation.
The organization was established to protect and restore the santa barbara channel and its watersheds through science-based advocacy, education, field work, community engagement, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws.
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.
We conserve and care for the diverse wildlands, farms, and ranches of the central coast. we connect people to the land and to each other.
The catalina island conservancy protects and stewards 88% of catalina island. more than 42,000 acres of wildlands, coves and coastal habitats. founded to preserve the island's natural resources, the conservancy advances a mission rooted in…
California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…
Land trust of santa cruz county (the organization) was incorporated in california as a not-for-profit corporation in 1978. the mission of the organization is to protect, care for, and connect all people to the vibrant natural and working…
To protect and nurture point lobos state natural reserve, to educate and inspire visitors to preserve its unique natural and cultural resources, and to strengthen the network of Carmel area state parks.
Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.
As california state parks' statutory non-profit partner, we have a clear mission - to help strengthen parks and inspire all people to experience these extraordinary places.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oneoc and the most unlike its peers is Regenitech Fund Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
181 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 181 of the 208 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Prentice School ↗
- Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
- Who funds Segerstrom Center for the Arts ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AIDS Services Foundation Orange County ↗
- Who funds GIANTS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY ↗
- Who funds SOUTH COUNTY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds OCEAN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ONEOC ↗
- Who funds WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACOMPAS INC DBA FLAMENCO SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEABODY CHARTER SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Working Wardrobes For A New Start ↗
- Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mission Plasticos ↗
- Who funds WALLEYES UNLIMITED OF MONTANA ↗
- Who funds Friends of Harbors Beaches and Parks Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Www Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · Rudi Schulte Family Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · The Kirby-Jones Foundation · Brittingham Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Schlinger Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Marine Sanctuary Foundation — 88% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Schlinger Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Schlinger Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.