· Private foundation
Schiele Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $46k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $109k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA NATURE ART MUSEUM | $108,500 |
| FRIENDS OF GOLF | $15,000 |
| THE FOUNDATION ROUNDTABLE | $10,500 |
| THE FUND FOR SANTA BARBARA | $10,000 |
| THE NICK TRAINA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| K2 ADVENTURES FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK | $5,000 |
| PARTNERS FOR POTENTIAL | $2,500 |
| SANTA YNEZ VALLEY BOTANIC GARDEN | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CNCALIFORNIA NATURE ART MUSEUM3× · 2022–2024 · $129k · revenue -37%
- FOFRIENDS OF GOLF INC2× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +95%
- LALA ANIMAL SERVICES2× · 2022–2023 · $15k
Funded once
- TATHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICAone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +19%
- TMTHE MAYFLY PROJECTone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +13%
- AFARTS FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE NETWORKgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +68%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.
The california film institute celebrates film and videos as art and education. its goal is to present and support emerging and established independent filmakers whose works address issues relevant to contemporary society. this is…
Promoting culturals arts in los angeles including education, gallery exhibits, artist living and work spaces theater, art and community festivals, artistic development and community outreach.
The museum's primary exempt purpose is to promote the understanding of the role of art and artists in americn culture through collect, exhibition, research, and instruction. the focus of the organization collection is on the art of…
Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.
Life on art unites people from diverse communities to co-create handmade large scale interactive art as a platform for social action and healing.
To enhance, expand, preserve and promote public recreation, parks and open space for the diverse people of los angeles.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Actors' Fund of America and the most unlike its peers is The Nick Traina Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA NATURE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF GOLF INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE MAYFLY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ARTS FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds RIDE ON LA RIDE ON THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR SANTA BARBARA INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA YNEZ VALLEY PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds ARMORY CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds Kids & Art Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE NICK TRAINA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds San Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds K2 ADVENTURES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Los Angeles Room & Board ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR POTENTIAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The California Endowment · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Schiele Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Southern Scholarship Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.