Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Schiavi Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$918k
Granted FY2025still arriving
72
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Human Services$789kReligion$649kRecreation & Sports$436kEducation$386kHealth$352kInternational$337kFood & Nutrition$232kYouth Development$219kOther$0
02FY2025 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $165k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $420k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $334k
$7,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Agassiz Village$70,000
Harrison Food Bank$56,000
Jesse's House$55,000
Ronald McDonald House - ME$52,500
Susan L Curtis Foundation$50,000
Franciscan Foundation for the Holy Land$50,000
Camp Sunshine at Sebago Lake Inc$40,000
Gulf of Maine Research Institute$30,000
New Beginnings$30,000
Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland$30,000
University of Southern Maine$25,000
Holy Family Hospital of Bethlehem Foundation$25,000
Parishes of the Western Maine Lakes and Foothills$21,000
Pink Feather Foundation$15,000
Catholic Foundation of Maine$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $486k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%National Education for Assistance Dog Services: $5k → 11%Homeless Period Project: $5k → 10%Bald Ridge Lodge: $10k → 4%Promise 686 Inc: $8k → 9%Ferst Readers Inc: $3k → 11%Mission Working Dogs: $15k → 13%Homeless Period Project: $5k → 10%Bald Ridge Lodge: $10k → 4%Promise 686 Inc: $5k → 9%Catholic Charities New Hampshire: $10k → 9%Sweetser: $10k → 9%Go Malawi: $6k → 13%Bald Ridge Lodge: $10k → 4%Promise 686 Inc: $5k → 9%Sweetser: $5k → 9%Bald Ridge Lodge: $10k → 4%Promise 686 Inc: $8k → 9%Sweetser: $5k → 9%Bald Ridge Lodge: $6k → 4%Sweetser: $5k → 9%New Beginnings: $30k → 13%National Education for Assistance Dog Services: $5k → 11%Sweetser: $5k → 9%New Beginnings: $23k → 13%Jesse's House: $55k → 4%LearningWorks: $5k → 7%Sweetser: $5k → 9%New Beginnings: $23k → 13%Jesse's House: $20k → 4%LearningWorks: $5k → 7%New Beginnings: $20k → 13%Jesse's House: $10k → 4%LearningWorks: $5k → 7%Jesse's House: $10k → 4%New Beginnings: $10k → 13%Jesse's House: $6k → 4%New Beginnings: $8k → 13%Preble Street: $10k → 7%Preble Street: $5k → 7%Preble Street: $5k → 7%Preble Street: $5k → 7%Riding to the Top Therapeutic Riding Center: $10k → 7%Riding to the Top Therapeutic Riding Center: $7k → 7%Riding to the Top Therapeutic Riding Center: $7k → 7%Riding to the Top Therapeutic Riding Center: $7k → 7%Riding to the Top Therapeutic Riding Center: $5k → 7%Riding to the Top Therapeutic Riding Center: $5k → 7%LearningWorks: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MI
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CO
VA
SC
DC
HI
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 64 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

64 repeat relationships — 57 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

64
11

Total granted

$3.6M
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+9%

Still filing today

70%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +16%
  • HF
    HARRISON FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $179k · revenue +18%
  • TS
    The Susan L Curtis Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $171k · revenue +186%

Funded once

  • SM
    Stephens Memorial Hospital
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • HC
    HAWAII CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Maine Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Maine creates, finds and supports programs that directly improve the health and well being of children statewide; provides affordable home away from home lodging which increases access to medical care for…

Health
2
Maine Needs Inc

We strive to help individuals and families in Maine meet their basic, material needs by providing donated clothing, hygiene products, household items, and other necessities. We focus our work on those starting life over from scratch:…

Human Services
3
The Genesis Fund

The mission of The Genesis Fund is to bring together resources to create housing and other economic and social opportunities for underserved people and communities throughout Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont.

Religion
4
Adoptive & Foster Families of Maine

Adoptive and foster families of maine inc. provides support services for adoptive and foster parents, and kinship providers. affm provides the training, guidance, knowledge, and resources needed to handle complex issues as families open…

Human Services
5
Homeworthy
Human Services
6
Maine Access Immigrant Network

MAIN serves as a bridge and cultural broker for multilingual access to health and social services for immigrants, refugees, and asylees in our community.

Human Services
7
Wings for Children and Families Inc

Wings For Children & Families partners with families and providers to deliver quality case management services utilizing the wraparound planning process, train other system providers improve quality of care.

Health
8
Hancock County Habitat for Humanity

Partnering with economically disadvantaged individuals and families. Hancock County Habitat For Humanity seeks to eliminate poverty housing and to make decent, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
9
Group Main Stream Incorporated

The Agency provides a residential setting to assist adults with developmental disabilities to accomplish and maintain their highest attainable living skills and to improve their quality of life by supporting independence.

—
10
Maine Access Points

To recognize the resiliency of people who use drugs and to work in collaboration to create access points for overdose prevention and harm reduction services in Maine.

Health
11
Kids Corner Inc

To provide affordable, yet high quality, developmentally appropriate day care services to local communities in a safe, responsive environment for children.

Human Services
12
Maine Media College

Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children and the most unlike its peers is Pink Feather Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterHealth Access Advocacy and …Domestic Violence ServicesCommunity Food PantriesElementary Literacy TutoringDevelopmental Disabilities …Independent K-12 SchoolsPublic Library OperationsLocal Food System Organizat…Food Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Sports ProgramsCommunity FoundationsChristian Youth CampsSenior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%2%<5yr12%8%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr19%22%20–35yr16%27%35–55yr18%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%0%<5yr12%9%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr19%30%20–35yr16%27%35–55yr18%25%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/73
the rest of the field
9%
845/9,478

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/70
Grantees still filing
52/70
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland — $270,000 · OtherRoman Catholic Diocese of PortlandRonald McDonald House - ME — $192,500 · OtherRonald McDonald House - MEAGASSIZ VILLAGE FOUNDED BY MR & MRS HARRY E BURROUGHS — $141,000 · OtherAGASSIZ VILLAGE FOUNDED BY MR & MRS HARRY E BURROUGHSUniversity of Southern Maine — $125,000 · OtherUniversity of Southern MaineSt William Catholic Church — $100,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherMAINE CHILDREN'S HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS — $70,000 · Other+38 more — $955,850 · Other+38 moreNew Beginnings — $112,500 · Human ServicesNew BeginningsJESSES HOUSE INC — $103,000 · Human ServicesJESSES HOUSE IN…BALD RIDGE LODGE INC — $48,500 · Human ServicesBALD RIDGE LODG…RIDING TO THE TOP — $41,000 · Human ServicesRIDING TO THE T…Sweetser — $35,000 · Human ServicesSweetserTHE HOMELESS PERIOD PROJECT INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOMELESS PE…Promise686 Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesPREBLE STREET — $25,000 · Human ServicesLEARNINGWORKS — $22,500 · Human Services+10 more — $68,000 · Human Services+10 moreThe Susan L Curtis Foundation — $171,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Susan L C…CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $165,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP SUNSHINE…MAINE ADAPTIVE SPORTS & RECREATION — $40,000 · Recreation & SportsMAINE ADAPTIV…SPECIAL OLYMPICS MAINE INC — $40,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMP…BICYCLE COALITION OF MAINE — $15,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $12,500 · Recreation & SportsFRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND — $300,000 · InternationalFRANCISCAN …MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC — $52,000 · InternationalMUSTARD SEE…Compassion International Incorporated — $31,000 · InternationalCompassion …HARRISON FOOD BANK — $179,000 · Food & NutritionTrinity Jubilee Center Inc — $38,500 · Food & NutritionOXFORD HILLS FOOD PANTRY OXFORD HILLS FOOD PANTRY — $37,000 · Food & Nutrition+4 more — $13,500 · Food & NutritionPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $60,000 · EducationPINE TREE SOCIETY INC — $25,000 · EducationTHE HARRISON VILLAGE LIBRARY — $16,500 · EducationGOULD ACADEMY — $10,000 · EducationSAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGE — $6,000 · EducationSAINT ANSELM COLLEGE — $6,000 · EducationTHE LIONHEART LIFE CENTER INC — $5,000 · Education+1 more — $2,500 · EducationGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $115,000 · Animals
Other$1,954,350Human Services$510,500Recreation & Sports$443,500International$383,000Food & Nutrition$268,000Education$131,000Animals$115,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND — $300,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetHARRISON FOOD BANK — $179,000 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetThe Susan L Curtis Foundation — $171,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $165,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetAGASSIZ VILLAGE FOUNDED BY MR & MRS HARRY E BURROUGHS — $141,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $115,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNew Beginnings — $112,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetJESSES HOUSE INC — $103,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetMAINE CHILDREN'S HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS — $70,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROOT CELLAR — $53,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC — $52,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBALD RIDGE LODGE INC — $48,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetThe Catholic Foundation of Maine — $45,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetRIDING TO THE TOP — $41,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMAINE ADAPTIVE SPORTS & RECREATION — $40,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MAINE INC — $40,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetRightstart — $39,500 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetTrinity Jubilee Center Inc — $38,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetOXFORD HILLS FOOD PANTRY OXFORD HILLS FOOD PANTRY — $37,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetSweetser — $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJENS FRIENDS CANCER FOUNDATION — $34,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetPINK FEATHER FOUNDATION — $33,000 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetLAKES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION — $30,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HOMELESS PERIOD PROJECT INC — $30,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetSafe Voices — $29,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SUMMER CAMP INC — $27,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPromise686 Inc — $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPINE TREE SOCIETY INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetABSTINENCE COALITION FOR EDUCATION NORTHEST — $25,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetSpurwink Services Inc — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPREBLE STREET — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN — $25,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC — $23,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLEARNINGWORKS — $22,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HARRISON VILLAGE LIBRARY — $16,500 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetDANIEL MEMORIAL INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBICYCLE COALITION OF MAINE — $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMission Working Dogs — $15,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetKIDSPEACE CORPORATION — $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFERST READERS INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGOULD ACADEMY — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEADS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGE — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT ANSELM COLLEGE — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LIONHEART LIFE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND ↗
  • Who funds HARRISON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds The Susan L Curtis Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds AGASSIZ VILLAGE FOUNDED BY MR & MRS HARRY E BURROUGHS ↗
  • Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds New Beginnings ↗
  • Who funds JESSES HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINE CHILDREN'S HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE ROOT CELLAR ↗
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BALD RIDGE LODGE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Catholic Foundation of Maine ↗
  • Who funds RIDING TO THE TOP ↗
  • Who funds MAINE ADAPTIVE SPORTS & RECREATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MAINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Rightstart ↗
  • Who funds Trinity Jubilee Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds OXFORD HILLS FOOD PANTRY OXFORD HILLS FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Sweetser ↗
  • Who funds JENS FRIENDS CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PINK FEATHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PRESENCE RADIO NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOMELESS PERIOD PROJECT INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Found…Elmina B Sewall Found…John T Gorman Foundat…Stephen & Tabitha Kin…Bangor Savings Bank F…Simmons Foundation - …Sam L Cohen FoundationSaco & Biddeford Savi…Narragansett Number O…Franklin Savings Bank…Good Shepherd Food Ba…Onion Foundation
Maine Community Foundation IncME54× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · John T Gorman Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · Narragansett Number One Foundation · Franklin Savings Bank Community Development Foundation · Good Shepherd Food Bank · Onion Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Schiavi Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Saint Michael's College — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Schiavi Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Schiavi Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines