Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Scheels All Sports Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$279k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$279k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$5.3MRecreation & Sports$4.4MYouth Development$1.0MArts & Culture$659kHealth$500kHuman Services$494kPublic Benefit$395kFood & Nutrition$270kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$278,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
West Fargo Youth Baseball$278,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $550k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Haley's Hope: $50k → 12%Hospice of the Red River Valley: $500k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
ND
MN
WI
SD
IA
CO
NE

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.4M · 22 repeat orgs$7.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
48

Total granted

$8.4M
$7.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+9%

Still filing today

50%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $279k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    North Dakota State University Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2.1M · revenue +245%
  • HB
    HARRISBURG BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $396k · revenue +5%
  • MY
    MALCOLM YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $371k · revenue +31% · 38% of their budget

Funded once

  • HO
    Hospice of the Red River Valley
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +13%
  • RR
    Red River Marksmanship Center
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $495k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canyon Lake Little League Baseball

Little league baseball for youth

2
Mandan Baseball Club Inc

To operate baseball program for the benefit of youth and their families so they may enjoy growth through recreational and competitive baseball.

Youth Development
3
Dakota United Soccer Club

The purpose for which this association is organized is to foster, encourage and promote the development of the soccer skills of players living in central north dakota under the age of 20.

Recreation & Sports
4
Minnetonka Diamond Club

The minnetonka diamond club seeks to encourage the minnetonka community to enjoy tonka diamond sports, teach young players and coaches how to play and enjoy diamond sports, and to enhance tonka baseball and softball facilities.

Education
5
Ice Sports Association Dba Scheels Iceplex

Operate and program an ice arena providing public and private ice rental facilities to the community and region with an emphasis on serving and growing youth ice sports.

Youth Development
6
South Des Moines Girls Amateur Softball

Provide the opportunity for girls ages 4 through 19 to learn and play the game of fast pitch softball

Recreation & Sports
7
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
8
Missouri Valley Family Ymca

To put Christian principles into practices through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
9
Sw Michigan Miracle League

Our mission is to provide opportunities for kids, regardless of their abilities, to compete and experience the joy and benefits that come from playing sports.

Recreation & Sports
10
Boys and Girls Clubs of Siouxland Inc

To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
11
Fargo Park District Foundation

The purpose of the Foundation is to pursue unique fundraising opportunities and increase private sector support to further the development, growth, and excellence of the Park District in providing modernized facilities and quality…

Recreation & Sports
12
North Liberty Youth Baseball & Softball

To organize and govern youth baseball and softball in North Liberty, Iowa as a non-profit, volunteer run, development, recreational league.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anne Carlsen Center and the most unlike its peers is Let's Skate. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Community College Foundatio…Youth Development CentersYouth Mentoring ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsElementary Literacy TutoringCommunity FoundationsChristian Youth CampsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Dance Arts OrganizationsUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity FoundationsLocal History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%35%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,523

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
23/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $1,500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $606,666 · OtherPARK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCRed River Marksmanship Center — $500,000 · OtherRed River Marksmanship CenterIndividual grant recipient — $495,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUND Business School — $450,000 · OtherCity of Great Falls — $395,000 · OtherMSU Mankato Sports Dome — $360,000 · OtherCity of West Des Moines — $300,000 · Other+33 more — $4,190,761 · Other+33 moreNorth Dakota State University Foundation — $2,100,000 · EducationNorth Dakota State Uni…CEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $390,000 · EducationCEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FO…BETHANY LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC — $270,000 · EducationBETHANY LUTHERAN COLLE…UND Alumni Association and Foundation — $150,000 · EducationANNE CARLSEN CENTER — $112,500 · Education+2 more — $158,400 · EducationHARRISBURG BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC — $396,000 · Recreation & SportsHARRISBURG BA…SIOUX CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC — $247,500 · Recreation & SportsSIOUX CITY PA…UNITED HEROES LEAGUE — $237,500 · Recreation & SportsUNITED HEROES…MINOT PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $225,000 · Recreation & SportsMINOT PARK DI…MOORHEAD YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $133,000 · Recreation & SportsMOORHEAD YOUT…LINCOLN YOUTH COMPLEX — $123,750 · Recreation & SportsLINCOLN YOUTH…FOX VALLEY POP WARNER FOOTBALL INC — $121,875 · Recreation & SportsFOX VALLEY PO…BILLINGS AMERICAN LEGION BASEBALL — $121,875 · Recreation & SportsBILLINGS AMER…American Gold Gymnastics — $118,800 · Recreation & SportsAmerican Gold…THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF SIOUX CITY — $90,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $49,500 · Recreation & SportsMALCOLM YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION — $371,250 · Youth DevelopmentCamp Sonshine — $360,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY — $97,500 · Youth DevelopmentCANTON-INWOOD AREA YOUTH ORGANIZATION INC — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC — $77,083 · Youth Development+1 more — $13,050 · Youth DevelopmentHospice of the Red River Valley — $500,000 · Human ServicesHALEY'S HOPE INC — $49,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MINOT INC — $225,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC — $135,000 · Arts & CultureCEDARS YOUTH SERVICES INC — $90,000 · Arts & CultureMinot Gun Club Incorporated — $237,500 · Community ImprovementFM Rotary Foundation — $66,000 · Community ImprovementFALL CREEK AREA FOUNDATION — $49,500 · Community Improvement
Other$8,797,427Education$3,180,900Recreation & Sports$1,864,800Youth Development$1,008,883Human Services$549,500Arts & Culture$450,000Community Improvement$353,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNorth Dakota State University Foundation — $2,100,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetHospice of the Red River Valley — $500,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHARRISBURG BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC — $396,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetCEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $390,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetMALCOLM YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION — $371,250 over 2y, 38% of budgetCamp Sonshine — $360,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC — $270,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBETHANY LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC — $270,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSIOUX CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC — $247,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetMONTANA RESCUE MISSION — $243,750 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetUNITED HEROES LEAGUE — $237,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION — $237,500 over 1y, 17% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MINOT INC — $225,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetMINOT PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $225,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetUND Alumni Association and Foundation — $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHEAST NEBRASKA YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $148,500 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetRED RIVER ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $135,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC — $135,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetMOORHEAD YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $133,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetLINCOLN YOUTH COMPLEX — $123,750 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFOX VALLEY POP WARNER FOOTBALL INC — $121,875 over 1y, 20% of budgetBILLINGS AMERICAN LEGION BASEBALL — $121,875 over 1y, 15% of budgetAmerican Gold Gymnastics — $118,800 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetANNE CARLSEN CENTER — $112,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY — $97,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF SIOUX CITY — $90,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetCEDARS YOUTH SERVICES INC — $90,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUnited Way of Cass-Clay — $90,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC — $77,083 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFM Rotary Foundation — $66,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetWESTSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $59,400 over 1y, 18% of budgetHALEY'S HOPE INC — $49,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetLET'S SKATE — $49,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetFALL CREEK AREA FOUNDATION — $49,500 over 1y, 36% of budgetMANKATO BALLET COMPANY — $22,500 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBIO Girls Inc — $13,050 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation CorporationND25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Dakota Medical Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Offutt Family Foundation · Sanford Group Return · North Dakota Community Foundation · Otter Tail Corporation Foundation · The Barry Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Dakota Medical Charities

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Scheels All Sports Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Scheels All Sports Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Scheels All Sports Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph