Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schafer Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$45kRecreation & Sports$13kFood & Nutrition$10kEnvironment$7kHuman Services$6kHealth$5kAnimals$2kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLD SPANISH DAYS - FIESTA$500
POBRES$500
PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $1k → 14%HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $1k → 14%HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $500 → 14%HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$75k · 16 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$75k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+167%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SY
    SANTA YNEZ VALLEY EQUESTRIAN ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +56%
  • TL
    THE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
    2× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +179%
  • HT
    HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER
    4× · 2018–2021 · $3k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • CR
    CALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUSTgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +89%
  • OT
    OLD TOWN COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • GO
    GOLETA OLD TOWN CHRISTMAS PARADE
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Benito Agricultural Land Trust

The mission of the san benito agricultural land trust is to conserve regionally significant lands that sustain productive agriculture, preserve open space, and maintain the rural character of the county.

Environment
2
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History

The following three guiding principles are the foundation for all of the santa barbara museum of natural history's activities: inspiring an awe for nature and a thirst for discovery; promoting sustainability; and connecting our…

Arts & Culture
3
Southern California Equine Foundation Inc

Providing equine veterinary hospital facilities and support services in the care of injured or sick race horses

Animals
4
Santa Barbara Zoological Foundation

The santa barbara zoo is dedicated to the preservation, conservation, and enhancement of the natural world and its living treasures through education, research, recreation and conservation.

Animals
5
Santa Ynez Valley Historical Society

To educate the public and preserve the history of the santa ynez valley.

Arts & Culture
6
Santa Barbara County Trails Council

Our mission is to protect public trail access build and maintain safe and sustainable trails and promote public engagement in land stewardship and trail use for all types of outdoor recreation.

Recreation & Sports
7
Monterey Bay Horsemanship & Therapeutic Center

Providing horse based therapy for handicapped and developmentally disabled adults and children.

Human Services
8
Big Sur Land Trust

The mission of the Big Sur Land Trust is to inspire love of the land and conservation of our treasured landscapes.

Environment
9
Land Trust of Santa Cruz County

Land trust of santa cruz county (the organization) was incorporated in california as a not-for-profit corporation in 1978. the mission of the organization is to protect, care for, and connect all people to the vibrant natural and working…

Environment
10
Land Trust of Santa Clara Valley

The mission of the land trust is to preserve agriculture and other working lands and open space in santa clara valley and adjacent areas.

Environment
11
Santa Barbara Museum of Art

To integrate art into the lives of people, fostering imagination, stimulating thought, and creating personally rewarding experiences.

Arts & Culture
12
Santa Barbara Trust for Historic Preservation

Our mission is to steward the past and present of the presidio neighborhood and inspire preservation advocacy throughout the county in order to create a more vibrant community. we do this by operating el presidio de santa barbara historic…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Rangeland Trust; the most unlike its peers is Santa Ynez Valley Equestrian Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARRIAGE MUSEUM OF SANTA BARBARA: $33,250 · OtherCARRIAGE MUSEUM OF SANTA BARBARASANTA YNEZ VALLEY HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $4,950 · OtherSANTA YNEZ VALLEY HISTORICAL MUSEUMFIESTA STOCK HORSE SHOW: $4,000 · OtherFIESTA STOCK HORSE SHOWCHANNEL ISLAND MARINE WILDLIFE INSTITUTION: $2,000 · Other+13 more: $11,351 · Other+13 moreCALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCALIFORNIA R…SANTA YNEZ VALLEY EQUESTRIAN ASSOCIATION: $8,550 · Recreation & SportsSANTA YNEZ…THE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $4,500 · EnvironmentAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $500 · EnvironmentSANTA BARBARA HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $3,500 · Arts & CultureSANTA BARBARA MARITIME MUSEUM: $1,500 · Arts & CultureHEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $3,000 · Human ServicesREINS OF HOPE: $1,500 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesSANTA YNEZ VALLEY THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM: $1,875 · Health
Other$55,551Food & Nutrition$10,000Recreation & Sports$8,550Environment$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000Human Services$4,550Health$1,875

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA YNEZ VALLEY THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM: $1,875 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSANTA BARBARA MARITIME MUSEUM: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREINS OF HOPE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $1,151 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA MISSIONS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SANTA YNEZ VALLEY EQUESTRIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA HISTORICAL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SANTA YNEZ VALLEY THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds REINS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA MISSIONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann Jackson Family FoundationCA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Oshay Family Foundation · Schlinger Family Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Www Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schafer Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schafer Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Schafer Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Schafer Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schafer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph