Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Schaeffer Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Religion$85kHuman Services$35kEducation$33kHousing & Shelter$5kHealth$5kPhilanthropy$4kCrime & Legal$3kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICA'S KIDS BELONG$20,000
HOLY ANGELS ACADEMY$10,000
CORPUS CHRISTI CLASSICAL ACADEMY$5,000
NOTRE DAME PRIORY$4,500
SSVM MISSIONS$3,150
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
FAMILY RENEWAL PROJECT$1,000
HOLY FAMILY RADIO$1,000
CATHOLIC SERVICES APPEAL$1,000
FRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE RENEWAL$1,000
CENTER FOR CLIENT SAFETY$1,000
COUPLE TO COUPLE LEAGUE$500
ST VINCENT DEPAUL$500
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CARITAS: $1k → 17%WESST: $200 → 14%AMERICA'S KIDS BELONG: $20k → 11%FAMILY RENEWAL PROJECT: $3k → 15%FAMILY RENEWAL PROJECT: $1k → 15%DAY SPRING: $100 → 15%SOUTHWEST CENTER: $200 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
NM
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$144k · 17 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
33

Total granted

$144k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+3%

Still filing today

35%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationCivil RightsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    Holy Angels Academy
    3× · 2022–2024 · $23k · revenue +17%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue ×150
  • CF
    Center for Client Safety Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • TN
    THE NAZARENE FUND MERCURY ONE
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CC
    CORPUS CHRISTI ACADEMY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dismas House of St Louis
Crime & Legal
2
Marian Center School and Services Inc

The organization provides education, adult training, pediatric therapy and residence services for the mentally retarded and developmentally disabled.

Human Services
3
Servants of Mary
Religion
4
The Sacred Heart of Mary Church Fdn
5
The Dynamic Catholic Institute

The dynamic catholic mission is to re-energize the catholic church in america by developing world-class resources that inspire people to rediscover the genius of catholicism.

Religion
6
St David's Center for Spiritual Direction
7
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
8
Shalom Center Inc

Shalom Center provides residential and out service programs and treatment for clergy and other religious persons.

9
Associated Catholic Charities Inc

Inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in need.

Human Services
10
Mount St Joseph-St Elizabeth

Epiphany Center residential treatment programs strengthen family life through early interventions when possible and by healing trauma, treating mental illness and substance abuse, and ending cycles of homelessness and poverty through…

Human Services
11
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

12
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St John Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Caritas Incorporated Dba Nearcare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%5%<5yr14%14%5–10yr18%19%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr14%29%35–55yr18%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%20%<5yr14%11%5–10yr18%59%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr14%4%35–55yr18%1%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 20% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
12%
2,432/20,296

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLY FAMILY RADIO — $7,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY RADIOFRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE RENEWAL — $6,000 · OtherSERVANTS OF THE LORD — $5,500 · OtherSSVM MISSIONS — $5,150 · OtherTHE NAZARENE FUND MERCURY ONE — $5,000 · OtherCORPUS CHRISTI ACADEMY — $5,000 · OtherSENIOR CARE — $4,500 · Other+31 more — $35,150 · Other+31 moreNOTRE DAME PRIORY INC — $43,600 · ReligionNOTRE DAME PRIORY INCMARIAN CENTER INC — $2,500 · ReligionMARIAN CENTER INCAmericas Kids Belong — $20,000 · Human ServicesAmericas Kids B…CORPUS CHRISTI INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesCORPUS CHRISTI …FAMILY RENEWAL PROJECT — $3,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY RENEWAL …Caritas Incorporated DBA Nearcare — $1,000 · Human Services+3 more — $500 · Human ServicesHoly Angels Academy — $22,500 · EducationHoly Angels…Center for Client Safety Inc — $4,000 · HealthANGELS IN DISGUISE INC — $500 · Health+1 more — $100 · HealthSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC — $4,200 · Housing & ShelterMercury One Inc — $1,000 · InternationalStudents for Life of America Inc — $250 · Civil Rights
Other$114,300Religion$46,100Human Services$30,000Education$22,500Health$4,600Housing & Shelter$4,200International$1,000Civil Rights$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNOTRE DAME PRIORY INC — $43,600 over 6y, 16% of budgetHoly Angels Academy — $22,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetAmericas Kids Belong — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC — $4,200 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCenter for Client Safety Inc — $4,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY RENEWAL PROJECT — $3,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST JOHN CENTER INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCaritas Incorporated DBA Nearcare — $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMercury One Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS IN DISGUISE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAY SPRING INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NOTRE DAME PRIORY INC
  • Who funds Holy Angels Academy
  • Who funds Americas Kids Belong
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI INC
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC
  • Who funds Center for Client Safety Inc
  • Who funds FAMILY RENEWAL PROJECT
  • Who funds ST JOHN CENTER INC
  • Who funds MARIAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds Caritas Incorporated DBA Nearcare
  • Who funds Mercury One Inc
  • Who funds ANGELS IN DISGUISE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository IncKY21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Barbara and Albert Horton Foundation Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Schaeffer Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph