· Private foundation
Barbara and Albert Horton Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k36 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOLY TRINITY CHURCH | $51,450 |
| NATIVITY ACADEMY AT ST BONIFACE | $16,200 |
| XAVERIAN BROTHERS | $10,000 |
| WEST END SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| CARING CENTER FOR WOMEN | $6,500 |
| HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER | $5,000 |
| CHILDCARE RESOURCES | $5,000 |
| LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR | $3,500 |
| CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE | $3,000 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $2,000 |
| INDIAN RIVER LAND TRAIL | $2,000 |
| ST JOSEPH ORPHANAGE | $2,000 |
| CREASY MAHAN NATURE PRESERVE | $1,000 |
| HOME OF THE INNOCENTS | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
66 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER INC6× · 2019–2024 · $130k · revenue +109%
- NANATIVITY ACADEMY AT SAINT BONIFACE5× · 2020–2024 · $52k · revenue +32%
- SBST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY2× · 2019–2022 · $38k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- SJST JOSEPH CATHOLIC ORPHAN SOCIETYone grant, 2020 · $58k
- SHSACRED HEART SCHOOLS AT URSULINE CAMPUSone grant, 2019 · $25k
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF COVINGTON INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a catholic healthcare ministry, we provide comprehensive and compassionate care that improves the health of the people we serve.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…
Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.
As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children
The mission of st. luke community healthcare is to remain an integral component of the communities of the mission valley through the delivery of personal, compassionate, quality health care in a dignified manner that values our patients,…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Methodist health provides quality healthcare services with a compassionate and caring spirit to persons, families and communities of the tri-state. at methodist health, our values are based on our commitment to quality. we define quality…
Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cabbage Patch Settlement House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Endicott College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER INC ↗
- Who funds NATIVITY ACADEMY AT SAINT BONIFACE ↗
- Who funds ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF COVINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds West End School Inc ↗
- Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT ACADEMY OF GREATER LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Holy Angels Academy ↗
- Who funds THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC ↗
- Who funds PITT ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds THE MORTON CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Lift a Life Foundation Inc · Norton Healthcare Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Barbara and Albert Horton Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Endicott College — 1% of income from government
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.