Skip to content

· Private foundation

Scaramucci Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$7.3MEducation$674kAnimals$552kFood & Nutrition$215kPublic Safety & Disaster$117kArts & Culture$45kEnvironment$29kScience & Tech$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SSM HEALTH ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION$1,000,000
OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY$280,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$250,000
OKC POLICE FOUNDATION$36,080
PROJECT 31$10,727
METRO TECH FOUNDATION$5,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$5,000
MYRIAD GARDENS FOUNDATION$3,000
NATIONAL EMERGENCY RESPONDER ASSISTANCE$1,300
ALLIED ARTS$1,000
OKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE$1,000
ARTS COUNCIL OF OKC$1,000
LEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA CITY$1,000
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA$1,000
WOVENLIFE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%WOVENLIFE: $1k → 16%WOVENLIFE: $1k → 16%WOVENLIFE: $1k → 16%WOVENLIFE: $1k → 16%WOVENLIFE: $1k → 16%WOVENLIFE: $1k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $2k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Scaramucci Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Scaramucci Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.7M · 20 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
9

Total granted

$6.7M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-5%

Still filing today

70%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $262k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $550k · revenue +410%
  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    2× · 2018–2020 · $409k · revenue +74%
  • REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $215k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.0M
  • HE
    HOUGH EAR INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
2
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
3
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
4
Downtown Oklahoma City Inc

The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.

Community Improvement
5
Leadership Oklahoma Inc

Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.

Public Benefit
6
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
7
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
8
Oklahoma Association of Realtors

The oklahoma association of realtors connects real estate professionals across the state by providing comprehensive professional resources, maintaining the highest ethical standards and giving realtors a unified voice in shaping oklahoma…

—
9
Oklahoma Repertory Theatre Group Inc

Okc rep produces live theater that builds community, creates conversation, and inspires us all.

Arts & Culture
10
Oklahoma Policy Inc

Oklahoma policy advances equitable and fiscally responsible policies that expand opportunity for all oklahomans through nonpartisan research, analysis, and advocacy.

Civil Rights
11
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
12
Dean Mcgee Eye Institute

The dean mcgee eye institute is dedicated to serving all oklahomans and the global community through excellence and leadership in patient care, education and vision research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Oklahoma City Inc; the most unlike its peers is Neighborhood Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SSM HEALTH ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $5,250,000 · OtherSSM HEALTH ST ANTHONY FOUNDATIONMAYO CLINIC: $1,000,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC+17 more: $191,230 · OtherMAYO CLINIC: $1,000,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $40,000 · Health+2 more: $20,727 · HealthOklahoma State University Foundation: $409,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · Education+1 more: $9,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $550,000 · AnimalsREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $215,000 · Food & NutritionMYRIAD GARDENS FOUNDATION: $28,900 · EnvironmentOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureARTS COUNCIL OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$6,441,230Health$1,060,727Education$668,000Animals$550,000Food & Nutrition$215,000Environment$28,900Arts & Culture$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $550,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $409,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $215,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD GARDENS FOUNDATION: $28,900 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSARAH MCLEAN FOUNDATION: $10,727 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHOUGH EAR INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHERITAGE HALL SCHOOL INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL VOLUNTEERS: $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWOVENLIFE INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILDERNESS MATTERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeighborhood Alliance Inc: $850 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD GARDENS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SARAH MCLEAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOUGH EAR INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE HALL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL VOLUNTEERS ↗
  • Who funds WOVENLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF OKLAHOMA CITY ↗
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILDERNESS MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood Alliance Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inasmuch FoundationOK30.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inasmuch Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Bowen Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Records Johnston Family Foundation · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Presbyterian Health Foundation · Vose Foundation Inc · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc · Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scaramucci Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scaramucci Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Arts Institute Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Scaramucci’s filings →

More from the funding graph