· Private foundation
Vose Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $92k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $35,000 |
| WINGS | $30,000 |
| OKC FOP LODGE 123 | $17,358 |
| REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA | $10,000 |
| ALPHA OMICRON FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| RECLAIM OKLAHOMA PARENT EMPOWERMENT | $3,500 |
| TEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS | $3,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| ALL SOULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $2,000 |
| OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY | $800 |
| THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA | $500 |
| ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION | $500 |
| OU FOUNDATION INC | $200 |
| OSU FOUNDATION | $100 |
| SPECIAL CARE | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +47%- RIREMERGE INC3× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +202%
- AOALPHA OMICRON PI FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- IHINTERGRIS HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $30k
- WSWINGS SPERICAL NEEDS COMMUNITYone grant, 2022 · $30k
- RCROATAN CHILDRENS MINISTRYone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.
The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…
The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.
To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.
The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.
The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.
Provide instruction for children in schools related to healthy lifestyle choices.
Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.
Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.
The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…
The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.
To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Chance to Change Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Let Every Woman Know - Alaska. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds REMERGE INC ↗
- Who funds ROATAN CHILDRENS MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds ALPHA OMICRON PI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KATHERYNE B PAYNE EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRETZPARK HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR THE DISABLED INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN SERVING ABACO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Let Every Woman Know - Alaska ↗
- Who funds TEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds MINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds The Meadows Center for Opportunity Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE ART STATION ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY CARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inasmuch Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Bowen Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vose Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Remerge Inc — 7% of income from government
- Special Care Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.