Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Prisma Health

Inspire health.

$32M
Granted FY2024still arriving
97
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$24M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Health$65MArts & Culture$26MEducation$8.0MPhilanthropy$2.0MCommunity Improvement$1.7MHuman Services$780kSocial Science$680kRecreation & Sports$537kOther$0
02FY2024 · 97 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $114k
  • $10k–50k59 grants · $994k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+6 grants · $29M
$16,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USC School of Medicine$24,007,500
Prisma Health-Upstate Foundation$2,290,394
Piedmont Technical College$1,007,180
Community Foundation Of Greenville$775,000
Tuomey Foundation$412,306
Well Partners Dental and Eye Health$345,000
City Of Columbia$200,000
Eau Claire Cooperative Health Center Inc$200,000
Greenville County Rec$150,000
County Of Greenville$125,000
A Child's Haven$101,800
SC Children's Theatre$100,000
Foothills Area YMCA$100,000
The Mental Illness Recovery Center Inc (MIRCI)$90,000
Greenville Chamber Of Commerce$82,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $738k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Feonix-Mobility Rising: $20k → 13%American Red Cross: $25k → 14%Foothills Area YMCA: $100k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%Senior Resources Inc: $20k → 16%Foothills Area YMCA: $100k → 17%FOOTHILLS AREA YMCA: $100k → 17%American Red Cross: $6k → 14%Foothills Area YMCA: $100k → 17%Safe Harbor Inc: $20k → 10%Mill Village Ministries: $10k → 10%SAFE HARBOR INC: $15k → 10%Healthy Learners: $10k → 16%Family Connection of SC: $8k → 16%Wiley Kennedy Foundation: $10k → 16%Upstate Warrior Solution: $10k → 10%Columbia Urban League: $50k → 16%Columbia Urban League: $25k → 16%COLUMBIA URBAN LEAGUE: $25k → 16%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $20k → 10%Safe Harbor Inc: $15k → 10%Good Shepherd Free Med Clinic: $20k → 10%Center For Developmental SVS: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$94M · 76 repeat orgs$9.3M to everyone else

76 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
46

Total granted

$94M
$4.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+17%

Still filing today

86%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TUOMEY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $808k · revenue +54% · 27% of their budget
  • EC
    EAU CLAIRE COOPERATIVE HEALTH CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $600k · revenue +0%
  • SC
    SOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $508k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA UPSTATE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2.6M · revenue +81% · 90% of their budget
  • MT
    MIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $705k · revenue -28% · 27% of their budget
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $655k · revenue +159%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Council On Competitiveness

The south carolina council on competitiveness is a nonpartisan, business-led non-profit organization committed to advancing the long term competitiveness of south carolina through actionable research, support of industry clusters and…

Community Improvement
2
South Carolina Business & Industry Political Education Committee

Promoting and protecting the free private and competitive enterprise system through research and education.

3
Charleston Metro Chamber of Commerce

To initiate, advocate and empower our region to advance a prosperous business environment.

4
Greater Macon Chamber of Commerce

To promote business, economic development, and community development within the greater macon area.

5
South Carolina Christian Chamber of Commerce

To unify christians in south carolina by connecting commerce and community to positively impact our culture for christ.

Religion
6
Alliance for a Healthier South Carolina

Convene and connect diverse stakeholders to align and catalyze efforts to improve health and well-being for communities across South Carolina.

7
South Carolina Council On Economic Education

Sc economics is the only sc non-profit organization exclusively dedicated to improving economic education and financial literacy by preparing teachers and students to be active, successful, and prosperous members of our global economy.

8
Chamber of Commerce of Columbia Cou

To be the leading voice of business in coumbia county providing advocacy, promotion, and benefit solutions to its members.

9
Greenville Area Development Corporation

Promoting and enhancing the economic growth and development of greenville county south carolina; gadc was formed by greenville county council.

Community Improvement
10
South Carolina Policy Council Education Foundation

The south carolina policy council was founded in 1986 as an independent, private, non-partisan research organization to promote the principles of limited government, free enterprise, and individual liberty and responsibility in the state…

11
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
12
Carolina Small Business Development Fund

Our mission is to foster economic development in underserved communities by providing capital, business services, and policy research to support small businesses.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upstate Sc Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hawkins Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCharter Schools and Alterna…Veterans Service Organizati…Midlands Community Organiza…Regional Chambers of Commer…Family Philanthropic Founda…South Carolina Conservation…Youth Sports & RecreationHigher Education Support Or…Early Childhood Development…Greenville Community Organi…Professional & Industry Ass…Diverse Member-Serving Orga…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%3%<5yr15%3%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr13%22%20–35yr12%30%35–55yr17%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%6%<5yr15%0%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr13%8%20–35yr12%70%35–55yr17%15%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/156
the rest of the field
15%
1,074/7,114

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

135 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 135 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
132/135
Grantees still filing
77/135
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

USC School of Medicine Greenville — $59,466,044 · OtherUSC School of Medicine GreenvilleUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA UPSTATE FOUNDATION — $2,600,000 · Other+87 more — $4,855,457 · Other+87 moreUPCOUNTRY HISTORY MUSEUM — $24,052,500 · Arts & CultureUPCOUNTRY HISTORY MUSEUM+13 more — $1,393,400 · Arts & Culture+13 moreGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC — $1,960,000 · EducationUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $1,357,500 · EducationPIEDMONT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDA- TION INC — $1,007,180 · EducationMIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $705,000 · Education+9 more — $245,000 · EducationPrisma Health-Upstate Foundation — $2,290,394 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC — $1,825,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $345,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $77,055 · PhilanthropyTHE TUOMEY FOUNDATION — $807,575 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $250,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC — $143,000 · HealthFREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $100,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF SOUTH CAROLINA — $70,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $65,000 · Health+14 more — $244,550 · HealthFOOTHILLS AREA YMCA — $400,000 · Human ServicesThe Columbia Urban League Inc — $100,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,500 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES — $30,000 · Human Services+10 more — $142,500 · Human ServicesTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $655,000 · Social ScienceINSTITUTE FOR CHILD SUCCESS INC — $25,000 · Social Science
Other$66,921,501Arts & Culture$25,445,900Education$5,274,680Philanthropy$4,537,449Health$1,680,125Human Services$773,000Social Science$680,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUPCOUNTRY HISTORY MUSEUM — $24,052,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA UPSTATE FOUNDATION — $2,600,000 over 1y, 90% of budgetPrisma Health-Upstate Foundation — $2,290,394 over 1y, 32% of budgetGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC — $1,960,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC — $1,825,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $1,357,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE TUOMEY FOUNDATION — $807,575 over 2y, 27% of budgetMIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $705,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $655,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEAU CLAIRE COOPERATIVE HEALTH CENTER INC — $600,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE — $507,500 over 4y, 12% of budgetFOOTHILLS AREA YMCA — $400,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $345,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER GREENVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $319,700 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetEdventure Inc — $300,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC — $250,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $250,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC — $171,434 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $143,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $118,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetA Child's Haven Inc — $111,800 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNAMI GREENVILLE SC — $100,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetThe Columbia Urban League Inc — $100,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetJULIE VALENTINE CENTER — $90,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMental Illness Recovery Center Inc — $90,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCITY CENTER PARTNERSHIP INC — $90,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC — $80,300 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $79,860 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetJunior League of Columbia Inc — $75,000 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF SOUTH CAROLINA — $70,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN HEALTH CLINIC OF PICKENS COUNTY — $65,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetSouth Carolina Research Foundation — $62,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS INC — $60,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetLIVEWELL GREENVILLE — $60,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetCENTRE STAGE-SOUTH CAROLINA INC — $60,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetGREENVILLE ARTS FESTIVAL — $57,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetLOCAL BOYS DO GOOD — $56,055 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetGREENVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $56,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGREENVILLE ZOO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ARTS COUNCIL — $55,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF GREENVILLE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFURMAN UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC72× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Prisma Health-Upstate · United Way of Greenville County Inc · The Jolley Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · The Leon Levine Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Prisma Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 159 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph